Wisconsin governor Scott Walker, facing a recall election in a little over three weeks, was caught on tape telling a top donor that he has a strategy to turn Wisconsin into a right to work state:
A filmmaker released a video Thursday that shows Gov. Scott Walker saying he would use “divide and conquer” as a strategy against unions.
Walker made the comments to Beloit billionaire Diane Hendricks, who has since given $510,000 to the governor’s campaign – making her Walker’s single-largest donor and the largest known donor to a candidate in state history [...]
In the video, Hendricks told Walker she wanted to discuss “controversial” subjects away from reporters, asking him:
“Any chance we’ll ever get to be a completely red state and work on these unions -”
“Oh, yeah,” Walker broke in.
“- and become a right-to-work?” Hendricks continued. “What can we do to help you?”
“Well, we’re going to start in a couple weeks with our budget adjustment bill,” Walker said. “The first step is we’re going to deal with collective bargaining for all public employee unions, because you use divide and conquer.” [...]
“So for us,” the governor continues, “the base we get for that is the fact that we’ve got – budgetarily we can’t afford not to. If we have collective bargaining agreements in place, there’s no way not only the state but local governments can balance things out. . . . That opens the door once we do that. That’s your bigger problem right there.”
The date of this conversation is January 18, 2011, just a couple weeks after he was elected, and BEFORE he released the budget repair bill that included the stripping of most collective bargaining rights. Some of the conversation appears in this ten minute promo reel for the film “As Goes Janesville,” but reporters got to see the raw footage of the whole conversation.
This has the potential to bring back to the fore the animating purpose for the recalls in the first place: Scott Walker’s war on workers. Sadly, the folks orchestrating the recall have gotten away from that in recent months, and as a result, a seeming lack of energy has attended the recall elections. You hear vague, anodyne things like “Scott Walker divided this state, we have to come together.” The focus is all over the place. But this conversation encapsulates why voters wanted to recall Walker: he hid his true ambitions, to run over public employees like teachers and nurses in the state. When he released his plans, he specifically tried to “divide and conquer” by exempting public safety workers, most of whom didn’t take the bait – the head of a local firefighters’ union, Mahlon Mitchell, is the Democratic candidate for Lieutenant Governor in the recalls.
Walker is STILL lying to the state about his intentions. In April, he said that “Private sector unions are my partner in economic development” and that right to work would never happen in Wisconsin. But this was his blueprint from the very beginning. He wants to impoverish state workers and send the profits up to management.
Tom Barrett, Walker’s opponent in the recall, jumped all over this.
“This is another colossal bait and switch that goes directly to his honesty,” Barrett said. “What he claims he is not in favor of publicly, to the person who has made the largest contribution in state history, he says exactly the opposite. You can’t trust him.”
Barrett has been hammering Walker on right-to-work legislation for weeks, frequently using the phrase “divide and conquer.” Barrett said he used that term because he believed that was Walker’s strategy, but did not know until Thursday that Walker himself had used it.
I hope this focuses the minds of the recall architects on what this recall is all about. If so, there’s a real chance to dump Walker.
More from local Wisconsin site Blogging Blue.




19 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Thanks, David.
x2
Yes, there is a real chance to dump Walker. However, there is also a real chance that Walker wins by nefarious means. The statewide Supreme Court election last year showed that. And if Barrett has no more desire to fight than that nominee did last year, it won’t matter one iota what the voters think.
Because last year, the Democrat won that statewide Supreme Court contest. I’d bet my last dollar on it. Milwaukee County results were obviously tainted to get the intended result. What’s to stop that here this time?? After all, same group administering this election as that one.
I think this Paul Street piece explains the shift from workers to party politics as usual: http://www.zcommunications.org/beyond-the-ballot-mania-wisconsin-reflections-by-paul-street The unions and the organizational Dems have captured the original anti-Walker movement.
I admit to not reading the link, because it was longer than a paragraph or two, so thought I would ask you since you apparently did.
Can you (or does Street) explain how it’s possible the unions could have “captured” the original anti-Walker movement when it was, by and large, the unions that started it? I get the point about the Democrats capturing the movement, but the unions?? It was public employee unions that started the movement, unless my memory is really effed up.
I wonder if Barry is paying attention to the Walker recall.
Cause if Walker wins come Nov 1, you can bet Wisconsin will be like Florida 2000 all over again.
With Walker, it’s not just about disenfranching some unions.
The link is vital stuff, well worth the time to read.
“I will never forget the command issued by one state Democrat speaking to tens of thousands of workers and their supporters outside the Madison Capitol Rotunda last March 12th: “Put down your [protest and strike] posters and pick up a [Democratic Party election/recall] clipboard.”
ugh
Money and organizational savvy. If a lot of people are milling around, angry but not organized, money and practiced strategy can quickly assume leadership. I see one of the biggest problems as what I’ve come to think of as “the old bulls.” However intentioned, and many of them are entirely devoted to their personal advantages and advancements, they’re stale, out of date, passé. Long past their sell-by dates. They haven’t had a new idea in decades, their allegiances are running on distant memories of old triumphs, their playbooks are yellowed and tattered. I went to a women’s day protest last Sunday and I thought I had fallen into a sixties time warp. I was so bored, I left after about 30 minutes–thought I should put in my appearance like a good scout, but, jeez louise, where have you people been all these years! I’m a senior citizen and what I’m noticing more and more is the utter out of it-ness of too many of the “leaders” of almost any organization you can think of: seniors and their disciples who may have been vital in the 60s and 70s but are now clogging up the top positions in far too many organizations and will not move aside or bring in the kind of younger people who could move these groups into relevance. These senior dogs in the manger are some of the biggest drags on effective action in this country. And they won’t let go of their privileged perches until they’re shoved off. Jimmy Florio was right on, same old, same old isn’t cutting it. Time for new people with new ideas.
Age isn’t necessarily the deciding factor. Obama is a old fart neoliberal, aside from his self-absorption, and his biggest failing is his mindless adherence to an economic theory that’s already moving into deserved disrepute–except among the emotionally calcified believers who don’t have the internal wherewithal to change in the face of contrary evidence. Clinging to false gods is not an intellectual function, it’s emotional and primitive.
I could go on about all the things the organizational geriatrics don’t know about, don’t know how to do, won’t do. But every one of you can think of some organization or three that used to be actively in the mix and has dropped off the radar. Still around and collecting membership dues but irrelevant.
I guess that is why we get several organizations working toward the same ends; someone feels that the established ones are not doing what they should and start a new one that is soon followed by another….
Proliferation doesn’t bother me as much as same old, same old. If you trace the various groups and factions, you’ll see the lineages: feeble shoots off old, dying stumps. Old wine in new bottles, if you prefer the phrase.
It was Waukesha County, and the woman administering that election actually recused herself from the recall.
It was really more on small union, the Teacher’s Assistants at Madison, that started it. The big unions didn’t get involved until later.
When, I assume, the big unions muscled aside the small union and appointed themselves “leaders.”
From what I read of that recusal, she was really boxed in by her incontrovertible, and very publicly displayed, incompetence. The woman must have the IQ of a flatworm. My god, she comes off as dumb! Dumb, dumb, dumb. If merit were the criterion, she couldn’t be hired as the office gofer. Just shows you what it takes to get up the ladder in politics. And people think office holders are in office because they know what they’re doing?
Ummm, she has held that position for how many years and swung how many elections? She may not be book smart, but she was smart enough to keep the elections flowing in the “right” way. What caught her out was the national attention in the last two elections there.
Scott Walker: Devoid and Cankered
Yes, she’s caused trouble before. http://waukesha.patch.com/articles/waukesha-county-clerk-embroiled-in-controversy-for-years She worked for David Prosser……that David Prosser.
As described, Kathy Nickolaus is an arrogant, ignorant smartass. Has anyone who’s worked anywhere more than a year or two not run into the type? They tend to stupidity and malice, altho I’ll concede that getting away with over long periods of time can make otherwise smart enough people stupid. Kathy Nickolaus is a shameful comment on tribal loyalty in the voting booth. (And, let’s be honest, there are Democrats who would vote for her if she ran on the Dem ballot line.)
I’ve said once and I’ll say it again: the DNC is the WCW/TnA of politics.
This is the best exposition I’ve seen and it pulls together my observations as I’ve gone around to this and that group looking for an effective action platform: http://www.tinyrevolution.com/mt/archives/001705.html
What is WCW/TnA? I’m familiar with the WCTU, which is still in business. I used to live in a town that has(had?) a chapter. Speaking of mummified organizations.