In my story on California’s budget woes, I mentioned a study showing that more qualified high school graduates are choosing not to attend college because they are priced out of the market for higher education. I should add that the ones who do choose to matriculate end up with a pile of debt after the fact. In fact, the New York Times ran a searing portrait over the weekend of a generation weighed down by student loans, which have become a necessary requirement for practically anyone seeking a college degree.
The facts are astonishing: 94% of all students with a bachelor’s degree have to borrow to pay for their education. Subtracting students on full-ride academic or athletic scholarships, that’s virtually everyone who goes to college. This number stood at 45% just 20 years ago. But since that time, the cost of college has zoomed, making it impossible for families to budget for it. There is now $1 trillion in outstanding student loan debt – and rising. On average, students owe $23,300 after college, in some cases much more.
The major reason for this explosion in student debt comes from the withdrawal of support for higher education at the state level. The cost of state colleges and universities in the 1950s and 1960s was miniscule. Now, funding for higher education on a per-student basis sits at decades-long lows, and funding for state prisons in many cases outstrips it. Faced with survival, colleges and universities have had to compensate for that loss of funding by raising tuition and fees. Public colleges will see their average cost double in 15 years if nothing is done, and the private college and university network has followed the trend.
While the political class debates an increase in the student loan interest rate, this increasing lack of affordability of higher education, a primary step for upward mobility in America, signifies the real problem. Student debt has a major impact on economic performance; young people drowning in debt tend not to buy cars or homes or other big-ticket items. This delay, along with the graying of America, means that demand halls on both sides of the generational divide, constraining economic growth. The buildup of debt, meanwhile, combined with a soft labor market, has led to increasing defaults and rotten private balance sheets, also hurting growth. And those who cannot make the choice for college at all get left behind completely.
The current system of higher education in America increasingly looks unaffordable and unsustainable, and nobody is considering any way to ameliorate it. And that has serious consequences for the US economy.




4 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
That six page New York Times “searing portrait” treated a college education as generic, but it isn’t the same for all people and so your mileage may vary. Somebody who studied theater arts has a lower probability of gaining a return on investment than somebody who studied engineering.
The National Association of College and Employers said the 2012 graduates most likely to receive offers were those with degrees in accounting, engineering, computer science, economics and business administration. In each of those fields, at least 50 percent of graduates who applied for jobs before graduation received an offer.
Overall, the National Association of Colleges and Employers reported that, among 2012 graduates who applied for a job before graduation, 26 percent landed one. That’s up from 24 percent last year.
The new brain drain…
So very sad…Lots of tax dollars went into trying to make higher end more accessible and now the states are cutting the $$$.
While day-to-day inflation is relatively flat, the three biggest capital investments a person makes are going through the roof: housing prices (a little flat right now,) medical costs and education. (Also Defense Dept expenses, but that strikes inflation in a different way.) So the .1% have made sure to get themselves into those revenue streams, and it’ll take an act of God to improve the situation for the average citizen…because the legislatures are being paid by that .1%
The solution is this option not even considered by any one.
How about “deficit funding” to support all infrastructure because a monetarily sovereign govt is not limited to spend only what it collects and all deficits become private sector wealth? See
http://my.firedoglake.com/pshakkottai/2012/04/20/misunderstood-deficits/
Deficit funding can pay for everything.
http://rodgermmitchell.wordpress.com/2012/03/22/monetary-sovereignty-for-young-people/
http://rodgermmitchell.wordpress.com/2011/12/24/why-federal-debt-is-not-debt-and-federal-borrowing-is-not-borrowing/
USA creates money and does not need to spend less than taxes collected but can deficit spend to its hearts content. All deficits become private savings and paying the national debt is a nonsensical concept supported only by propaganda. For proof see
http://pshakkottai.wordpress.com/2012/02/27/national-debt-and-national-wealth-compared/
http://pshakkottai.wordpress.com/2012/03/30/another-proof-of-mmt-4/
and for details see
http://pshakkottai.wordpress.com/2012/02/26/misunderstood-deficits/
I quote from Mitchell: There is no deficit problem. There is no debt problem. The whole charade is based on “Anthropomorphic Economics Disease,” the false belief that federal financing is just like yours and mine. But, federal “deficits,” “debt” and “borrowing” are entirely different from your deficits, debt and borrowing — not even close. Visualize astronomers basing their hypotheses on the astrological signs, and you’ll get the idea.” from
http://rodgermmitchell.wordpress.com/2011/03/08/economic-ignorance-unquestioned-by-the-media-politicians-mainstream-economists-and-the-public-where-is-the-outrage/
USA is very rich and can afford it. The average wealth is 60 trillion / 300 million = $ 200,000 per capita, not distributed evenly by any means. The GDP per capita is 15 trillion / 300 million = $ 50,000 per capita.
Here is a break down as to who is attending school (all stats are as of 2007):
Males enrolled: 7.8 million
Females enrolled: 10.4 million
Full time students: 11.3 million
Part time students: 6.9 million
Students aged 25+: 6.6 million
Undergrads: 15.6 million
Grad students: 2.3 million
If free tuition is offered to 20 million students it would cost 50,000*20,000,000 =1 trillion for 4 years.This would provide a strong educated workforce and a strong democracy which is not easily fooled by mainstream propaganda by its masters, the plutocracy.