The polling showing that voters hold negative opinions of the President’s performance in housing policy and Wall Street accountability suggests that Americans have a hungering for a much tougher policy on these issues and will reward candidates who reflect that, according to the pollster who did the survey.
Jim Williams of Public Policy Polling, who did the questioning for Campaign for a Fair Settlement, told me in an interview that the polling displays a lot of anxiety about the economy as a whole. “A lot of voters still tie that back to the housing collapse and banking crisis of 2008,” Williams said. “The struggling housing market is continuing to drag down the economy. And so there’s a sense of ‘Why is this happening and who do we blame?’”
The polling, according to Williams, shows that there’s room for President Obama or candidates at the Congressional level to be more strident on bank accountability, and stronger on housing policy. “Our numbers show that people would be very receptive if candidates were to tackle those issues more strongly,” he said.
We’re already seeing this on both sides of the aisle. Congressional candidate Eric Griego in New Mexico became the first this cycle to go out with a direct message in advertising that Wall Street bankers who broke the law should go to jail. It’s quite amazing that this is a novel concept, but politicians often lag. And their bread is often buttered by Wall Street largesse. Griego followed this up with an op-ed hitting on very specific themes for Wall Street accountability:
Fight to increase 20-fold the number of investigators for the financial crimes federal task force led by New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman. Right now, this task force only has 55 investigators and prosecutors. The Savings and Loan crisis of the 1980s was staffed with over 1,000 investigators, experts and prosecutors. That effort yielded more than 600 convictions and $130 million for taxpayers. One of the first bills I offer will be to increase the funding and staffing for this financial crimes task force [...]
Push the U.S. Justice Department to more aggressively prosecute white-dollar crimes by Wall Street bankers. To this day, not one Wall Street banker who broke the law, tanked the economy and took away people’s homes and savings is in jail. We need to hold them accountable, and members of Congress can exert key leverage with the Justice Department to make investigations and prosecutions happen.
Strengthen the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and close the loophole in the legislation’s “Volcker Rule” that was exploited by JPMorgan recently – when their risky bets lost $2 billion. Many of the legislation’s provisions are designed to go in effect in 2014, so the rules are still being written. Congress can’t allow Wall Street bankers to write their own rules – we need Wall Street reform to stay on the agenda in Congress.
This is not isolated. Elizabeth Warren has been capitalizing on the JPMorgan Chase “Fail Whale” trade by seeking a reinstitution of the Glass-Steagall Act. AFL-CIO President Rich Trumka endorsed that yesterday, saying “We need a bright line to separate speculative trading from the traditional role of banks as lenders. Anything less will place our economy at risk of yet another financial crisis in the years to come.” Consumer advocates have begun to grumble about reforms to mortgage servicing proposed by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Delaware Attorney General Beau Biden insisted that more indictments were needed of players in the foreclosure crisis and various fraus scandals. “People are angry,” Biden told MSNBC. “Republicans, Democrats, Tea Partiers and 99 Percenters are all angry that no one has been held accountable for something they know is obviously fraught. And that’s my job as AG.”
Even Republicans have begun to back off their position of repealing Dodd-Frank and “serving” Wall Street. In a somewhat remarkable circumstance, the House GOP abruptly stopped work on bills that would have repealed or gutted derivatives regulation from Dodd-Frank. Frank Lucas, the chair of the House Agriculture Committee, which has oversight over derivatives, said that in the wake of the JPMorgan Chase debacle, “this Committee will take the time to gather all relevant information before we proceed to ensure there are no unintended consequences of the legislation that would encourage recklessness in our financial institutions.”
This is where this sea change on housing policy and bank accountability has the potential to roll back on the President. In Karl Rove’s Crossroads big ad buy on Obama’s “broken promises,” the very first promise shown is the one to “help the millions of homeowners facing foreclosure.” The failure of HAMP and the lack of prosecutions of Wall Street crimes could really factor large in the Presidential election, even if Mitt Romney has no plan to shift those policies.
I’m not certain that the Obama campaign takes this seriously, but given the relationship between Wall Street, housing and the economy, it’s bound to be a major topic of discussion and debate. And the President has options if he wants to crack down on Wall Street and provide meaningful housing relief. His failure to do may be the normal outcome of captured government, but it could soon become a political problem as well.




29 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
I already voted for O based on what he said he was for and against and what he said he was going to do if elected. I will vote for Jill Stein and hold my head high as I exit the voting booth. Bess Truman famously quipped before the ’48 election that people will “hold their nose and vote for my husband” but the stench of the 1% is strong with Obama; not so with Truman eventhough Truman was a product of the corrupt Prendergast Machine.
Ya think? Maybe O will have to reshuffle his stump speech a little.
Seriously, this has been hanging fire since 2008, maybe earlier. Only a fool could not see it. Maybe this guy just refused to see it. Gettin’ kinda late in the game here, chief. Maybe no one told him. Wake him up quick.
Please, not Schneiderman, this corrupt wimp.
My vote is for Spitzer. A man with balls, in more ways than one, and willing to lay them on the line. A rare quality in today’s Democratic party.
I would guess that Obama has been on the phone with Jaime Dimon every day saying “don’t worry about this, Jaime. I got your back. It will blow over. Ignore everything I say publicly. I have to say it. It’s an election year, otherwise I’d give you a cabinet position.”.
Obama’s a little slow in comprehending the bleedin’ obvious.
Umm, all we need to know here as far as BO, and banking and housing accountability are concerned is what he said a few days ago after the news broke. Dimon and Chase are excellent. Dimon is a great guy and Chase is well run. ‘Nuff said!
“Chinese Bank Now Allowed to Take Over U.S. Banks” (International Business Times AU, May 11, 2012)
Would like some banking expert to weigh in on that.
No one in Washington or the punditocracy has been more strident in defense of the status quo than Obama. Maybe that’s just part and parcel of having the bully pulpit, but Obama is, right now, the poster boy for “the wrong side of history.” If Obama wants to seize the populist moment, his change in tone is going to have to be so extreme as to be almost surreal. Meanwhile, Romney’s still a blank slate who can grab any mantle between now and November. I still think Obama will win though. Either way it’s bad news.
And if he changes his tune, will you believe him?
As a village idiot masquerading as president once said: “Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on ..er..ah..er..won’t get fooled again”.
But he doesn’t, so he won’t.
And what idiot would give a shit, or put one ounce of credence, in anything Trumka says?
It’s our sovereignty so we are the banking experts. We have to be in control of our governments down to the city level not the TBTF with the Goldman Sachs’s crew in China making a run everywhere they can.
From https://twitter.com/#!/exiledsurfer/status/200489458909446144 :
From https://twitter.com/#!/birgittaj/status/7228120398569472 :
Notice Iceland?
From https://twitter.com/#!/birgittaj/status/201983464138997760 :
May 13, 2012:
Sure looks like the Iceland 1%ers are off cutting a deal with the Chinese 1%ers. Mercs don’t work for free. Like masaccio says, make The Casino-Gulag a dessert:
Wall Street Stunned by Vanishing Investors | By: masaccio Wednesday May 9, 2012 12:38 pm
So, the financial exchange massively decentralizes and retrenches to the very local and people dump the bankstas for local cooperatives instead (see http://www.garalperovitz.com).
I am a proud supporter of Eric Griego for Congress! NM leads the way, we have a few democrats who are worth electing.
One huge pyramids scheme– that’s what the current economic-political governance structures form– constantly yield the same oppressive results for the majority of people (سلام Mark Fiore!)
Next stop:
Occupy Bilderberg | By: David Swanson Wednesday May 16, 2012 7:30 am
Ok but…. Doesn’t the fed control the level of reserves the bank must have? The banks success would sem to depend on what loans it can make. I’m just trying to figure out what “extra” things they can do?
On a related note, Yves has this up on NC:
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2012/05/so-much-for-schneiderman-being-tough-on-wall-street.html
The prosecution rests. Literally.
Love your state. You ever been to White Sands? Man, that’s one BIG beach to not have an ocean attached to it.
Unfortunately, here in Texas if you’re not a repuglican you can’t get elected dog catcher.
Great Analysis!
Obama and Mitt Romney are both court jesters of the Banks
I agree Obama has better be very, very, careful being nice to Wall Street is not the way to go, because what is good for Wall Street is Horrible for main street.
the idea of holding the Dem Convention in the Wall Street of the South is insane!!
I doubt few intelligent Dems will be holding photo ops in front of Bank Of America Corp Head Quarters?
I’m good with Spitzer. He does have balls. He doesn’t always keep ‘em in his pants. But, that doesn’ really bother me.
Very good!
Notice the similarities of the Obama logo and B of A. Colors wont clash at convention.
I’ve worked out a plan for the election. No, bear with me on this…..
Definitions: Democrat- leans left, republican- leans right
If you are a democrat in “red” state vote green. State’s electors gonna go to Romney anway so you haven’t wasted your vote. You show both parties you aren;t happy with them.
If you are a republican in a “blue” state, vote green. Same efffect as above. Your votes counts as a “none of the above” ballot without benefitting either side.
Now, if you live in a “purple” or “swing” state…….well…..I haven’t really worked that out yet. BUt I DO have a really neat drinking game I’ve developed especially for this election I’ll be releasing in November.
@ BP..you’re particularly poignant today.
As evidence that Americans do not want a leader to take a tougher stand against the banks I posit the following:
Obama won unopposed in the Democratic Primary.
The most pro-theft candidate won in the GOP primary, while the fellow with the most bona fides against the banks, Ron Paul, did not win any states (disputed).
I will tell exactly what Americans want: they want the abundance they have taken for granted all their lives to continue without much effort or sacrifice on their part. Thus, the biggest liar usually wins the election.
Obama was clearly the 2008 Liar-in-Chief with his Hope and Change ad campaign, next to McCain’s honest war lust. Romney is trying to coverup his hatred for average people, but he isn’t that good at it. Obama wins another term.
If he will lie to and betray his wife, what will he do to you, a stranger?
Jesus — – What part of O’s affection for Jamie Dimon do you not get? Or is this just an exercise in politics?