The London Independent comes out with the largest estimate I’ve seen of losses on JPMorgan’s Fail Whale trades: $7 billion.
The crisis at JP Morgan escalated yesterday as it emerged its trading losses in London could rise to as much as $7bn (£4.5bn) and the US bank cancelled a share buyback. Fears were growing that the losses could spiral from an initial $2bn, which was declared on 10 May, as JP Morgan struggles to unwind the massive bets made by the so-called “London Whale” trader Bruno Iksil.
The $7 billion number comes from “rival traders,” who probably aren’t completely unbiased on this. Still, it was rival traders that inflicted these losses in the first place, by taking the other side of Bruno Iskil’s bets. So I don’t doubt that, as one trader says, “The markets know pretty much what JP Morgan has and in what sizes.”
Moreover, as I said yesterday, JPMorgan Chase’s suspension of share buybacks looms really large here. They are clearly not suspending that $15 billion purchase just because they suddenly decided to be prudent on capital requirements, or because they just figured out how much reserves they have to hold under Basel III, which was put together in September of 2010. The only things that have significantly changed at JPMC between the March buyback announcement and the May suspension are the Fail Whale trades. So it’s almost certain that this is just a much bigger deal than the $2 billion number most media outlets are still going with.
But not to worry, we’re about to get a thorough investigation by the Senate Banking Committee. Do you know who will be running those Banking Committee investigations? Former JPMorgan Chase lobbyists, of course!
Luckily for Dimon, the professional staff in charge of managing the banking committee will be quite familiar to him and his team of lobbyists. That’s because the staff director for the Senate Banking Committee is none other than a former J.P. Morgan lobbyist, Dwight Fettig.
In 2009, Fettig was a registered lobbyist for J.P. Morgan. His disclosures show that he was hired to work on “financial services regulatory reform” and the “Restoring American Financial Stability Act of 2009″ on behalf of the investment bank. Now, as staff director for the Senate Banking Committee, he will be overseeing the hearings on J.P. Morgan’s risky proprietary trading [...]
According to disclosures filed with the ethics committee, Fettig made $448,225 a year as a lobbyist before moving back through the revolving door. Before he was a lobbyist for Freddie Mac, J.P. Morgan, and other financial industry interests, Fettig served as a Legislative Director for Senator Johnson. Though he is making less money now as a civil servant, his privileged position at the helm of Wall Street policy in the Senate will make him even more valuable to K Street if he chooses to leave.
Best political system in the world, bay-bee!





34 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Feds looking at J.P. Morgan disclosures
Time for Jamie to find some more
highly compensated employeescannon fodderwho need to spend more time with their families or pursue other business interests.
As it’s been said, “best democracy money can buy”.
wasn’t it senator Dick Durban who said
“”And the banks — hard to believe in a time when we’re facing a banking crisis that many of the banks created — are still the most powerful lobby on Capitol Hill. And they frankly own the place”
So Dimon’s bonus is some percentage of the loss, right?
I didn’t bother reading the article, but I’d bet that someone affiliated with JPM will be in charge of quashing the findings, if there are any. Same old, same old.
this needs to be a youtube comercial that goes viral,i got 100 bux to start it
Crony capitalism, doncha just love it ?
oops
How’d you guess? lol.
If only….
Bet THAT would change some behavior faster than regulations would.
“Hey you, you make us a million bucks, you get a nice percentage as a bonus.”
“But you lose us a million bucks, you get a nice percentage as a ‘negative’ bonus.”
Yeah, that would end the gambling in like… one day.
I think it’s called Occam’s Razor.
Jamie will be feted by the committee and given the very first “Wall St Failed Whale” award to show their appreciation for all Jamie’s contributions to fucking up the world economy.
Then he’ll go have dinner at the White House since he’s BFF with Obama.
SO, WHAT RESPONSE DOES DAVID DAYAN SUGGEST? Does Dayan believe voters should reelect the one man responsible for doing NOTHING to fix the problem for the last 3+ years? Is there a purpose to complaining without recommending a resolution to the complaint?
The Revolving door is a feature of our new Casino economy that saves time & money for the buyers of Gov’t services. Not so much for the rest of us. Look at it as another attribute of the Free speech = $ equation & it makes perfect sense. As they say , moving along nothing to see here.
Emotional release?
While I’m confident that DDay won’t be voting for Mitt, I haven’t heard him say who he’ll support. Despite the fact that Obama will be the Dem nominee, there are still possibilities for a populist / progressive to run.
As for his solutions, he’s been pretty clear that it should start with AG Holder. I *think* DDay has even called on Holder to recuse himself… since Holder’s revolving door is the legal representation (Covington??) for Wall Street. And that should be followed with actual investigations and, presumably, prosecutions… not just whitewashing.
The way I see it, maybe NOT “the best”. But certainly a bargain.
Gotta watch the British press. Nosy bunch of bastards. But they keep diggin’ ’til they find something. Ifn you claim a loss of $2B and it ends up being $7B, Jamie, you got a lot ‘splainin’ to do.
Why how nice for Jamie Dimon.
Color me unsuprised.
As others said: the best “democracy” that money can buy, and Dimon’s got lot$ of ca$hola for the payola.
It’s just the best one you can buy. It is quite possible you might be able to steal a better one. We’ll have to wait and see.
Jamie has no explaining to do. If any explaining is necessary, Fettig will wave his hand and repeat the Paulson / Geithner / Bernanke phrase:
Dimon and the MOTU own the Admin and Congress. While the Whale Fail matters to us, it matters little to the participants of Kabuki Theater.
:(
LOL. To state the obvious, this just in…
Only honest thing Durbin has ever uttered. (Otherwise known in DC as a “gaffe” — accidentally admitting the truth.)
har, made me laugh, thanks
Who put Fettig in as Staff Director for the Senate Banking Committee?
Anyone know?
Well, Fettig previously worked for Johnson’s office. And I think Tim Johnson (D-Wall Street) now chairs Banking… and I’m pretty sure the Committee Chairs staff the committees, along with their own office, so…
I’m guessing Johnson put him in place.
Is there hegemony amongst the uber wealthy? If it’s 2 or 7 billion or more won’t some rich people get pissed since the risk to their money wasn’t disclosed? This is a big oops.
We know the Gubermint won’t do anything but won’t the people who lost money call their lawyers?
Sounds “DIRE”, who will we print money for in January?
Here it is straight from Abramoff. No need to speculate.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eBXRs8cbZj0
Not necessarily. If any MOTU is in *actual* danger of losing money, Dimon already has the go-ahead to pull a “Corzine” and transfer the money to the MOTUs accounts… with the finishing touch of throwing his admin asst under the bus… while Jamie tells reporters that he’s too busy to answer their questions as he’s headed to another Fed NY meeting.
Yay for the MOTU!
Claude Raines: “I’m shocked, shocked to find gambling going on in here!”
Waiter: “Your winnings sir.”
Claude Raines: “Oh, thank you very much.”
Huffpo had an article that when you factor in the loss of value in JPM/C stock, the true hit is $30 billion for what Obama’s next Treasury Secy, Jamie Dimon, called a ‘tempest in a teapot’
“Supreme Court Justice”
“Gay Marriage”
“Fraud Dank” I mean “Dodd Frank”
“HAMP”
Mrs. O’Leary’s cow and the Tick that Ate Ina Drew:
From one of DD’s post yesterday:
Investment Office At JPMorgan Chase Allowed to Chase Profits and Downplay Risk
As early as 2010, the senior banker who has been blamed for the debacle, Ina Drew, began to lose her grip on the bank’s chief investment office, according to current and former traders. She had guided the bank through some of the most rugged moments of the 2008 financial crisis, earning the trust of Jamie Dimon, JPMorgan’s chief executive, in the process.
But after contracting Lyme disease in 2010, she was frequently out of the office for a critical period, when her unit was making riskier bets, and her absences allowed long-simmering internal divisions and clashing egos to come to the fore, the traders said.”