The President laid a wreath at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier at Arlington National Cemetery today, and he made a proclamation:
“After a decade under the dark cloud of war, we can see the light of a new day on the horizon,” he said at Arlington National Cemetery, drawing applause when he noted the “milestone” of it being the first Memorial Day in nine years without Americans fighting and dying in Iraq.
“As commander in chief, I can tell you that sending our troops into harm’s way is the most wrenching decision that I have to make,” Obama said shortly after laying a wreath at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier.
“I can promise you I will never do so unless it is absolutely necessary and that when we do, we must give our troops a clear mission and the full support of a grateful nation.”
No wars unless “absolutely necessary.” I feel so reassured!
More seriously, I’d say this is the most patriotic thing happening in America today. It does the most to honor the troops, by rethinking a strategy that puts them into impossible situations and incredible danger:
Now at another critical moment in American military history, the faculty here (at West Point) on the commanding bend in the Hudson River is deep in its own existential debate. Narrowly, the argument is whether the counterinsurgency strategy used in Iraq and Afghanistan — the troop-heavy, time-intensive, expensive doctrine of trying to win over the locals by building roads, schools and government — is dead.
Broadly, the question is what the United States gained after a decade in two wars.
“Not much,” Col. Gian P. Gentile, the director of West Point’s military history program and the commander of a combat battalion in Baghdad in 2006, said flatly in an interview last week. “Certainly not worth the effort. In my view.”
Rethinking counter-insurgency is just long overdue. I never saw it as much more than a make-work program for defense contractors. It was a theory predicated on believing that modern wars take huge commitments over a number of years. It put us into two of the longest wars in our history – three, if you see Vietnamization as an early prototype of COIN – which also happen to be the most tragic and needless. But it filled that marketplace need for a lot of ordnance and tanks and communications equipment and mess hall personnel and all kinds of supplies and activities that a ready civilian army of private military contractors could provide.
Sadly, this remains more of an academic debate than a policy debate. Gian Gentile serves as one side of a debate within West Point, one that hasn’t necessarily penetrated the Pentagon. The Counter-Insurgency Field Manual still animates thinking in policy circles, and the legacy of Petraeus and McChrystal still holds a lot of sway.
Unfortunately, over the past few years, if counter-insurgency has waned, it has been in favor of the new American way of war, characterized by covert operations and drone attacks. While there’s a minor benefit in not risking the lives of soldiers and maximum treasure, it presents a host of other problems, including sowing hatred and risking blowback.
These are not the only two options for foreign policy – occupation or robot warfare. The best way to honor the service of the American military is to ensure they no longer have to fight, regardless of method. I am awed whenever I visit Arlington West, a weekly installation next to the Santa Monica Pier put on by Veterans for Peace, marking the dead from Iraq and Afghanistan. I’d be far more awed by its obsolescence.




15 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
From the link provided: ““But war ultimately is a political act,”; THAT should never be forgotten.
And the ‘counterinsurgency’ manual that Petraeus updated uses Vietnam and the Philippines as as base for it’s arguments, both VERY sad rationales.
Maybe there would be no counter insurgency if we minded our own damn business .
o owns the troop surge and the failure that is wrapped around his neck by his own hand.
He’s also a first class warmonger and LIAR , a warmonger quality.
Perhaps a more appropriate discussion/debate would entail the necessity for military institutions, including not only the armed forces schools, but especially the “School of the Americas”, now rebranded as “WHINSEC”. Why does the USA celebrate war and those who wage it, as opposed to the peacemakers? Why is violence lauded and sex condemned? Why aren’t our leaders branded as the liars they are, rather than saying that they “misspoke”? We truly live in an upside down reality.
Ten years (and trillion$) into several Counterinsurgency MIC Private Contractor-benefitting wars and West Point decides to showcase an election season “debate” over the merits of COIN.
It wasn’t worth it. They say.
No shit.
West Point. They’re brilliant.
When it comes to pimping self-serving bullshit, this preznint is every bit as “good” as….George Bush.
Great example of that oxymoron, “military intelligence”.
He’s actually superior to “W” because he’s more eloquent is masking his lies.
“
oops.
no promotion for you, Col. Gian P. Gentile.
When I hear West Point or any general, etc., is “studying” counterinsurgency I yawn. I am positive they know what needs to be done, but refuse for a variety of reasons. How do I know this? I am a Vietnam Veteran and, from 82-84, I wrote a thesis on the history of insurgency-counterinsurgency in Vietnam. I self-published this as “Tribal Soldiers of Vietnam.” For anybody interested, just read the description I wrote for it on Amazon. You don’t even need to read the whole book. After that, you will be able to argue better than any general or think-tank. For me, what happened in Iraq and Afghanistan is so predictable; the drugs, the militias becoming criminal gangs, the corruption, etc., etc. West Point has a copy of my book–I donated one to them–but are now just getting around to studying the subject. Most importantly, I even noted in 1984 that what happened in Vietnam could easily happen in those very countries. But, hey, I’m just a historian and anthropologist, so what do I know?
“Why does the USA celebrate war and those who wage it” ; goes back to the Monroe Doctrine
It’s alive! –some reports from Afghanistan, a nation being built by U.S. taxpayers –
May 31, 2011, Washington (CNSNews.com) — A senior official for the U.S.-led NATO Training Mission and Combined Security Transition in Afghanistan said that national forces there are projected to have attained a third-grade literacy level by the time they take the lead for their country’s security — in place of U.S.-NATO forces — at the end of 2014.
KANDAHAR AIRFIELD, Afghanistan, Apr 10, 2012 – A host of senior Afghan and U.S. dignitaries met at Herat University March 26 to formally open a teacher training facility, built with U.S. Agency for International Development funding by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Afghanistan Engineer District-South. The $900,000 facility provides 18 classrooms, four laboratories and archive and library capacity to support graduate education training and to prepare future teachers. The facility will train the teachers who will help Afghanistan in its rebirth and growth, Cunningham said. “I thank the Afghan workers who built this facility – they have created a legacy, where students will hone their skills for the renewal of Afghanistan.”
WASHINGTON, April 29, 2011 – When the task to help rebuild and reconstruct Afghanistan was established, Army Col. Thomas H. Magness IV, the commander of Afghanistan Engineer District-North, initially had concerns about how much could be accomplished. . .“We have transitioned from being in construction, to finishing projects at the rate of one completed project per day,” Magness said. “I’ve never seen this kind of construction pace. But I’ve also never seen a community — in this case, the engineering and construction community — that has grown as much as it has. It has risen to the task.”
January 24, 2011 — Insufficient project management and weak contract oversight are jeopardizing billions of dollars in taxpayer-funded Afghan reconstruction monies, a top federal watchdog testified on Monday. Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction Maj. Gen. Arnold Fields, who recently announced that he will resign, told the congressionally chartered Commission on Wartime Contracting that efforts to build bases and training facilities for the Afghan Army and police are well behind schedule and that billions are at significant risk of going to waste.
“The ultimate conclusion reached is that warfare by proxy produces far reaching disastrous consequences.” ; but what do I know because I’m neither an anthropologist or historian, just someone who asked my mum,when reading the newspapers headlines about the Korean ‘War’ (which wasn’t a ‘declared war’ and still hasn’t properly ended), what war was, who served during Vietnam and still sees those whose lives were ruined by that ‘war’, and has watched this country again and again use violent force to further it’s business and entrenched power interests.
And now I read about all those vets of Iraq and Afghanistan filing disability claims, just furthering the costs that were predicted back in 2005
And now the costs are up to $4 TRILLION !!
And good soldier that he is, Shinseki is now the Secretary of Veterans Affairs but was telling the truth -and it contradicts Col. Michael J. Meese arguments- when he said “”something in the order of several hundred thousand soldiers” would probably be required for postwar Iraq”.
It looks like Obama may not have to make such a wrenching decision to send troops into harm’s way as often any more. He can just send in the Predator drones — regardless of the innocent victims who happen to be in harm’s way.
I somewhere that the first rule of counter-insurgency is don’t even try it unless you have no alternative. Also, you need a force equivalent to about 5 percent of the total population in the theater of war, plus a reasonably legitimate local government to partner with. None of those conditions can be met in Afghanistan/Pakistan.
That would be “counter-terrorism” (CT) now that Petraeus’s “counter-insurgency” (CI, or COIN) has been thoroughly discredited.
COIN doctrine involves the US military assisting a Host Nation — “HN” in the COIN manual FM 3-24 — both fight off an insurgency and develop effective governance.
But of course the whole COIN thing was a facade which involved mislabeling people resisting US military imperialism, and its puppet government, as “insurgents.” That is as wrong as calling the members of the French Resistance in the 1940′s “insurgents.” Baloney.
Calling Karzai’s government a “Host Nation — more baloney.