In an upset last night, Beto O’Rourke, a former city councilman in El Paso, defeated incumbent Democrat Silvestre Reyes in the Democratic primary in Texas’ 16th district. O’Rourke just crossed the 50% threshold needed to avoid a runoff. This is a safe Democratic seat for November.
The race in the border district was important, because it was fought in part on the grounds of the drug war and border policy, and the pro-drug war, pro-border militarization candidate lost. O’Rourke supports the legalization of marijuana as a way to deny a profit source to Mexican drug cartels and end violence that can spill over the border. Reyes based much of his attack on O’Rourke over this position, and while O’Rourke never committed to making this a signature policy of his, he stood his ground and defended his stance. It doesn’t mean anything will change right away on the drug war in Washington – O’Rourke is just one politician – but it means that the spectre of drug legalization being always a political loser and harsh drug policy always being a political winner must be reassessed.
Reyes got endorsements from Presidents Obama and Clinton, and even had Clinton in to campaign for him. None of this mattered. O’Rourke got a boost from the “Campaign for Primary Accountability,” a PAC that has been working to oust longtime incumbents this year. It should be noted that O’Rourke was helped out by crossover voters in the open primary.
Matt Stoller writes the epitaph for Reyes’ career:
Reyes, the ranking member of the Intelligence Committee and a member of the Unmanned Systems Caucus in Congress (the Predator Drone caucus) is a proponent of militarizing the border and sending in drones to Mexico to kill cartel leaders [...]
There are many reasons to be happy that Reyes lost. He is and was an awful Congressman, both stupid and craven. As Democratic leader of the Intelligence Committee, Reyes did not know the group Hezbollah, and he didn’t know whether Al Qaeda was Sunni or Shia. Reyes is a proponent of any number of authoritarian policies violating our civil liberties, and he is backed by predator drone cash. So if you like militarizing, well, everything, then Reyes is your man. And this has been the trend recently.
I hope this leads to an actual debate about the role of drug policy in this country, though I’m not hopeful. It’s going to be a slow and agonizing process. Even with Reyes’ loss, drug policy really only has one constituency on Capitol Hill, and that’s the Tough on Crime gang. We need more Beto O’Rourkes to change that.
UPDATE: Ryan Grim has a very good backgrounder on this race.




16 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Presumably Reyes’ policies on drones and border militarizing were informed by lobbying and contributions from the industries that benefit most from such policies. It will be interesting to see what happens when “Beto” is met by these same lobbyists and offers of contributions (ie, bribes). My guess is that he’ll “tack a course towards the center” as they say.
Yes.lets remember that Beto is a member of the Democratic Party,a corrupt political entity.We will see like you stated when lobbyist cash comes against peoples rights,how Beto plays.
Good riddance to the corrupt creek,Reyes now if a few more of the corrupt leaders,like Pelosi,Clyburn,Levin etc,etc should be kicked out maybe just maybe there is hope for we the people.
Everyone is making big bank off the drug “war”–(actual) war profiteers, crooked police departments, drug lords, etc–and the only people really getting hammered by it are a few inconsequential minority folk. So it’s a win-win for everyone. I’m not sure why anyone would have an issue with Obama’s rabid prosecution of the “war” on drugs.
We can’t expect any Freshman Congressman to make a difference, but we can hope that this will elevate the issue.
It’s telling that Obama endorsed Reyes. In a chance to strike a small blow for real reform, and od something that requires a smidgeon of political courage, Obama caves for the umpteenth time, and protects the corporate status quo.
So the DINO drug warrior was – Surprise! – supported by Obama and Clinton.
I’m under no illusion that this will make a big difference, but it annoys the hell out of me when our supposedly progressive president unfailingly supports the Lincolns and Liebermans over actual Democrats. And it just tickles me no end when he falls flat on his face.
“As Democratic leader of the Intelligence Committee, Reyes did not know the group Hezbollah, and he didn’t know whether Al Qaeda was Sunni or Shia. ”
lord help us.
FYI…..Texas primaries held last night. Here in Houston/Harris & Ft Bend counties lots of incumbents lost. LOTS. Maybe the anti-incumbency movement is “on the way.”
Looking forward to the photograph of a close aid whispering into O’s ear that he’s lost the election.
“This is a safe Democratic seat for November”…
Thats sick… that means the seat will remain with one of the two TOTALLY CORRUPT political parties.
Thats the worst possible outcome… just more of the same… nothing could be worse.
What ever gave you the impression that Obama was “progressive”? His pledge to escalate the war effort in Afghanistan and order drone strikes in Pakistan? Maybe it was his vote for retroactive immunity for the telecoms after his speech on the Senate floor condemning it.
We are governed by idiots and scoundrels.
Can you read? Look up the word “supposedly.”
Let this be a wake-up call to Reyes and all those other vile prohibitionists who wish to continue with a policy that has proven itself to be a poison in the veins of our once so proud & free nation
Prohibition has finally run its course; our prisons are full, our economy is in ruins, the lives and livelihoods of tens of millions of Americans have been destroyed or severely disrupted, and what was once a shining beacon of liberty and prosperity has become a toxic, repressive, smoldering heap of hypocrisy and a gross affront to fundamental human decency.
Accordingly, it is now the duty of every last one of us to insure that the people who are responsible for this shameful situation are not simply left in peace to enjoy the wealth and status that their despicable actions have, until now, afforded them. Former and present Prohibitionists must not be allowed to remain untainted and untouched from the unconscionable acts that they have viciously committed on their fellow citizens. – They have provided us with neither safe communities nor safe streets; we will provide them with neither a safe haven to enjoy their ill-gotten gains nor the liberty to repeat such a similar atrocity!
Perhaps if you’d used quotations marks in your original comment it would have been more apparent.
I’d have done that if I hadn’t qualified the word “progressive” with the word “supposedly.”