So here’s another revelation of fraud for your Monday morning. Gretchen Morgenson has the story:
Days before Bank of America shareholders approved the bank’s $50 billion purchase of Merrill Lynch in December 2008, top bank executives were advised that losses at the investment firm would most likely hammer the combined companies’ earnings in the years to come. But shareholders were not told about the looming losses, which would prompt a second taxpayer bailout of $20 billion, leaving them instead to rely on rosier projections from the bank that the deal would make money relatively soon after it was completed.
What Bank of America’s top executives, including its chief executive then, Kenneth D. Lewis, knew about Merrill’s vast mortgage losses and when they knew it emerged in court documents filed Sunday evening in a shareholder lawsuit being heard in Federal District Court in Manhattan.
The disclosure, coming to light in private litigation, is likely to reignite concerns that federal regulators and prosecutors have not worked hard enough to hold key executives accountable for their actions during the financial crisis.
Ah, that New York Times understatement.
The information in the shareholder lawsuit includes sworn testimony from Ken Lewis, the former Bank of America CEO, admitting that he received the large loss estimates on the Merrill deal. Shareholders didn’t hear about the Merrill losses until two days after approval. This looks like an open and shut case of BofA defrauding its investors.
BofA acquired Merrill, along with Countrywide, in a frenzy of purchases during the financial crisis. It made BofA, one of the last banks standing, one of the largest megabanks in the country, but both acquisitions were disastrous, saddling the company with massive lawsuit exposure, toxic loans and liabilities from which the firm has arguably not recovered.
I would love to know the role of the federal regulators in this. The BofA-Merrill deal was very much a shotgun wedding, encouraged by Treasury and the Fed. Were they aware of the loss statements? Did they tell the bank executives to scotch the information? We’re talking about September 2008, with shareholder approval by December 2008. So somebody should give Mssrs. Paulson, Bernanke, and probably Geithner a call. Bernanke has previously stated before Congress that he “did not play a role in arranging this transaction.”
Regardless of the government’s role, you have in this lawsuit Ken Lewis admitting to defrauding shareholders. If the Securities and Exchange Commission is at all worthy of the name, they need to forward an investigation of this to the Justice Department. Ex-CEO Lewis and the entire BofA board at the time should go to jail.




28 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Obama’s statute of limitations applies:
Look forward not backward.
No crimes here.
Is all of corporate America nothing but organized crime?
Gee, guess Gretchen Morgenson forgot the first rule of corporate ‘Murka:
What happens in the Board Room stays in the Board Room.
Eff the shareholders, and double/triple/quadruple EFF the taxpayers.
So there! Nyah nyah nyah. Wotcha gunna DO aboudit? SUCKAHS!!!!
Forward to Holder’s DoJ? I’ll bet Lewis is quaking in his boots.
Ex-CEO Lewis and the entire BofA board at the time should go to jail.
Except that they’re probably working with Corzine on Obama’s reelection campaign.
Working on O’s campaign? Dya think O wants to lose the election?
Judging from the toupee Ken Lewis is wearing, it’s clear he likes to hide things.
Go to jail for what? Unless they were smoking pot when they lied I see no case here. Meanwhile O and the FEd gearing up to scare the living daylights out of the people and announce a multi trillion bank bailout. Promise this time it will trickle down into the economy once they have enough money to hire Joe the Plumber to unclog the pipe.
We are all being boiled to death and they know there is F all we can do about it
Heh. Guessing admin is working up their legal arguments that since the USG bailed out BoA, all the documents are a matter of national security & can’t be revealed in the courts.
Well, David, that seems a litle
harshaccurate.Who is this “Holder” guy you keep referring to????
It certainly appears that way. But, hey, you GOTTA admire the organization. These guys are GOOD.
We should hold a contest for Holder’s replacement. Who could possibly be worse that O will tap.
OK, But, I challenge you to come up with a “job description” based on what this guy has done.
GOTCHA!
David…you’re jousting at winmdmills again.
BUt, I like your attitude.
Job description? Bury all embarrassing cases.
Ain’t no justice, just us.
Nice!
That was pretty good too!
Oops…
Go Gretchen. Go D-Day.
Um…Rahm?
Good suggestion but I think he’s otherwise engaged ruining Chicago.
Oooh, oooh, I got someone who can do even LESS than HOlder as AG……..Johnny Cochran.
With the added benefit that he’s a more colorful character.
TBogg says they shouldn’t be prosecuted because that might decrease the chance of President Obama’s re-election, which is The Only Thing That Matters(r)(tm).
God Save the Obama!
uhm,isnt he dead?
If Geithner and Paulson strong-armed the BOA management into lying to share holders (and yes, they probably did http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2009/07/16/henry-paulson-heads-to-capitol-hill/), then they should not go to jail, though I would like a lifetime ban from management and investment and commercial banking.
It’s Geithner and Paulson who need to go to jail.
This may be why Barack does not want to prosecute. If Geithner gets indicted, his reelection bid is toast.