Iran has agreed to discuss proposals to limit its uranium enrichment at talks in the next week in Moscow over its nuclear program.
A tense exchange of letters between EU diplomats, who deal with Iran on behalf of the six powers, and Iranian officials had earlier appeared to suggest Tehran may be backtracking on its expressed willingness to discuss their most pressing concern – high-grade uranium enrichment even in broad terms.
But on Monday, Iran’s chief nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili agreed to focus on the six powers’ demands at the Moscow meeting, during a one-hour phone conversation with EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton.
“The Iranians agreed on the need for Iran to engage on the (six powers’) proposals, which address its concerns on the exclusively peaceful nature of the Iranian nuclear program,” a spokesman for Ashton said.
The negotiations, which had been taking a negative turn of late, will probably focus on the elimination of the production of highly enriched uranium, above 20%. This is something that Iran agreed to years ago, with a fuel swap between them and another country, so the uranium gets enriched elsewhere. But that was rejected, in favor of a proposal that the P5+1 (permanent five members of the Security Council plus Germany) could better control.
Meanwhile, the Senate, being as helpful as ever, sent a bipartisan letter asking the Administration to basically not negotiate during the negotiation.
Authored by Sens. Robert Menendez (D-NJ) and Roy Blunt (R-MO), the draft letter outlines the “absolute minimum steps” Iran must take in Moscow: shutting down its Fordow enrichment facility, ending enrichment of uranium to high levels, and shipping out its stockpile of high-enriched uranium. The letter says that Iran’s agreement to these steps would “justify continued discussions,” but doesn’t outline any other possible concessions.
While that leaves the door open for other possible lesser concessions, the Senators rule out acceding to a key Iranian goal until Iran agrees to the full spectrum of Western and U.N. demands.
So as the Administration goes to Moscow, the Senate is trying to shut down any possible concessions, and even larding on additional sanctions. Basically the hardliners in the US are trying whatever they can to muck up negotiations. If we get anything out of Moscow it’ll be a miracle.





20 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
So the Senate wants a war? I assume they will wait until after the elections the GOP does not want to risk O winning the war right before an election.
New Rule everytime we go to war the kids, grandkids of politicians must all be put into frontline units expected to face the most combat.
Lets see how many wars we fight then. Lets see if the military wastes money on star wars, foreign bases etc neglecting to buy enough armored humvees, bullet proof vest etc just so they can get another high tech jet.
We’re not gonna go to war.
Ahmadinejad and the Ayatollah are verrry resaonable people. They will listen and recognize that there i s a peacewful solution to this.
TRUST ME.
(Do you think she bought that????)
What a great idea!
Reading about the “negotiations” with Hitler over Czechoslovakia. Every time GB or FR caved, Hitler upped his demands.
Ditto Iran vis-a-vis U.S.
U.S. won’t stop before there is regime change and a dictator U.S. can puppetize is in place.
Might take a decade or so more, as it did in Iraq. But it’s coming. U.S. will not take yes for an answer.
Iran is just toying with the EU, is my guess. Why not? Iran is doing just fine with its well-off Asian neighbors, the petroleum sanctions have been waived for every country except China, other currencies than the dollar will be used for transactions, and Iran is diversifying its exports. US exports to the EU dropped 11% but US exports to Iran tripled from March to April! How about that.
This whole concocted ‘crisis’ is meant to take the focus off of Palestine, the settlements, Palestine’s statehood and the attempts of the Arab League to to get nuclear controls on Israel. It’s succeeding at all those, so why have a settlement which could only include cutting back on sanctions during a presidential race — political poison. They’ll drag it out, both the US and Iran.
““The Iranians agreed on the need for Iran to engage on the (six powers’) proposals, which address its concerns on the exclusively peaceful nature of the Iranian nuclear program,” a spokesman for Ashton said.” ; this is really the result of Chinese interactions with the Iranians.
OTOH, that “puppet” thing hasn’t been working so well for us lately. Oh,we overthrow the existing dictator/corrupt government like before. But, noticed, Afghanistan, Iraq? And we still got a “Help Wanted” ad out for Libya.
Serious inquiry..so the Chinese are helping??? I didn’t know that.
In this case, Iran is the reasonable party. The PNAC mission is a USA road map for hegemony and it was crafted and implemented by the USA. Just because PNAC changed their name doesn’t mean their policies aren’t in place.
This regime change won’t be as covert as the coup that overthrew Mossadegh in 1953 and installed the Shah.
http://news.yahoo.com/china-urges-iran-show-flexibility-pragmatism-nuclear-talks-100121868.html
I just read that the war in Iraq has cost
one trillion dollars.
Maybe that’s low.
War with Iran, might be the end of the USA.
Not that any of those people that want such a war could imagine that, or care.
Hubris of empire makes it immune to reason & evidence.
The latest news is that Iran is developing a nuclear submarine which will require
5%20%95% U235. That should gain some AIPAC/senatorial reaction, when Iran enriches uranium to weapons/submarine grade.Much obliged, pilgrim.
I think I’ll go to the local Chinese Restaurant, Lucky Dragon III, to show show them how much we appreciate that.
I heard (for real) they were trying to buy an old Russian nucleur sub.
Apparenhtly there are several on eBay.
The cost of the GWOT to date is over one trillion. There are several estimates out there that put total costs, depending on which study you read, between 3 and 4.5 trillion.
Does any one really believe that Iran is negotiating in good faith?????
Everyone who doesn’t believe the bullshit that the US govt. and corporate media propaganda catapult into our information stream 365, 24/7. When was the last time we were told the truth by the PTB that run this country?