So here’s me and William Cohan on yesterday’s The Alyona Show talking about that Jamie Dimon testimony yesterday. I have to admit a little shock at the focus of the coverage on the captured Congress and the relative soft pitches lobbed in Dimon’s direction. I’m wondering what people expected. This wasn’t the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, Carl Levin’s committee, which gave the most brutal hearing of the financial crisis to members of Goldman Sachs’ team. This is the Banking Committee. Most of its members are effectively employees of JPMorgan Chase and the other Wall Street banks. Many of its staffers are actual former employees. Many of the lobbyists of these banks are former staffers to these Senators. This is where bank-friendly Senators go to ensure the most campaign contributions. There was a moment of time after banks blew up the world’s economy where they could be expected to get a brushback from a committee like this, but that time has passed.
That doesn’t mean that Dimon is out of trouble relative to the Fail Whale trades. To the extent that the hearing would have any impact, it was over the interpretations of the Volcker rule. Even the most optimistic reformers would tell you that we’re not getting anything beyond that until there’s another financial crisis. And on that front, as Sen. Jeff Merkley said, Dimon’s admission that a stronger Volcker rule could have stopped “what the synthetic portfolio morphed into,” – right before saying that Volcker was unworkable and impossible to implement – gives credence to the need to get the final rule, which is expected in July, closer to the true legislative intent. Dimon actually hurt himself in the hearing, if you believe that he wanted an unencumbered way to continue proprietary trading without any regulatory barriers. Merkley was pretty much the only tough questioner because, as the author of the Volcker rule, he was the only one with anything at stake.
But I don’t know what another world, beyond that one re-interpretation of the Volcker rule, was supposed to look like yesterday. Dimon told you himself he was, in the parlance of the mob, a “made man.” He told you it with his choice of cufflinks, the most subtle symbol in a Congressional hearing since Michael Corleone brought Frank Pentangeli’s brother from Italy to sit in the hearing room during the special committee on Cosa Nostra activity. Dimon was wearing Presidential cufflinks. Kevin Drum speculates on what this meant.
There are several possibilities:
Don’t fuck with me. The president has my back.
Give it up, GOP. I still support Obama no matter how much you suck up to me.
Hey Obama. See these? Don’t take them for granted.
I think it’s almost certainly the first one. Jamie Dimon has nothing to fear from the Senate Banking Committee, in the final analysis, because they’re not really in charge of anything.




32 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Thank you for seeing the cufflinks. Guy probably doesn’t have a long sleeved shirt with buttons.
Gawd, what I wouldn’t give for a true progressive third-party candidate with enough money to run a whole bunch of TV commercials showing these cufflinks and then cutting back to show Dimon wearing them. Talk about “optics”.
Why is it people have so much trouble seeing what is right in front of their face?
Jamie Dimon wasn’t going before congress to explain his bank’s poor management and risky behavior.
Jamie Dimon was the big boss sitting down with his employees to make sure they haven’t forgotten who signs their checks.
Watt4Bob nails it! We are the victims of some seriously organized crime.
Just sad, so so sad. “Bought and paid for” doesn’t even do it justice anymore.
Famous last words. Just ask Tom Barrett.
And the biggest JPM whore on the Senate Banking Committee is……drum roll…..Chuck (the Schmuck) Schumer, member of the Democratic Party, the party that fights tirelessly for you and your loved ones.
SBC’s JPM whores are listed here, with the take from their tricks:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/cost-best-senate-banking-committee-jp-morgan-can-buy-877798-bribes
Great interview David – more please.
No kidding. Chuck the Schmuck has been doing his bank suck up for a looong time now, and he ain’t gonna remove his lips from that sweet sweet corporate tittie any time soon.
Anyone who thinks Schooooomer works for “the people” just ain’t paying attention. The Schmuck works for the 1%, and how!
Thanks for the update, and also for the “tip” on the cuff-links.
Really this is yet another act in the ongoing Kabuki Show. This one is entitled:
Wherein some committee or other pretends – but only vaguely and in passing – to get “tough” with one of the more egregious crooks in what’s called “the banking industry,” but more accurately should be called organized crime set up to vastly rip off the middle and working class for the benefit of the 1%. Softball questions were lobbed at one of the mob bosses, who pretended to provide some kind of answer, but who knows? Really does it matter? The 99%, per usual, was asleep at the wheel, so the PTB don’t really bother to do much of anything anymore. Suckahs!
Let’s face it, we’re screwed. The oligarchs, after the successful deregulation of the banking industry during Clinton’s 2nd term, aren’t about to allow effective re-regulation of the financial industry, which would be absurdly simple. It would interfere with their redistribution of wealth from the 99% to the 1%.
Uh, NO! Try this:
Leave it to Drum to get it wrong.
That’s right. It’s all downhill from here. When you’re on the North Pole, every direction is south.
Nobody in their right mind would let Obama get behind them, they’d be liable to get stabbed in the back. How about this instead: I make sure the president’s back pocket is filled with graft.
Did he fly down on his private jet?
Inquiring minds want to know.
Air Force One.
We are the victims of some seriously organized crime.
Sometimes you break me up.
Nicely done.
Now that’s disturbing.
P.S. Have you noticed this depressing shit is happening almost every day now.
Do you sell new cars or just own one?
Actually, I was originally “carguy” and FDL screwed up my account so I had to re-enroll and I used “newcarguy” for my fans. Several asked about the “handle” anda I explained as I do here.
Fan of old American muscle cars. Have a restored ’78 Silver Anniverary Vette.
Hope I didn;t bore you.
Most interesting thing on FDL so far today.
Me gottum mint condition ’89 Monte Carlo SS with ground effects package from Featherlite Engineering. Bought her brand new and only has 46,000 original miles.
I thought it meant -
I’ve got O’s balls in my pants pocket, but Michelle wants them back later this week…
As a side tangent, what continues to amaze me is how much I now rely on RT (Russia Today) news for a look at the US news that isn’t spun out of all take on reality by the MSM. For a guy that had his own little role in the cold war, this is certainly a change.
And you did good on TV, dday! Thanks for all your work on this stuff, it’s very important.
And now we have the best, deepest news reporting courtesy of…..Russia Today! (Note the scrolling text, Russia peace conference with China on Syria…)
Meanwhile, the US corporate media is feeding us lost blonde on Bimini.
Then you know that there is nothing like having a classic American car as the family “money pit”.
I kid, I wouldn’t take anything for it. And, with all the “pollution control” stuff now legally removed, new intake and exhaust, that 4 speed Muncie realy moves it on down the road.
David is the modern day Thomas Paine.
On my bucket list:
Roman red with black interior 62 Chevy 425hp 409. Giddyup!
64 Dodge alum front end 425 hp 426 Ramcharger. (To replace the one I had for awhile as a youngun’. Black with black interior, roll bar, no back set. 127.11 in the 1/4 mile. (One-time NHRA SS/AA top speed record holder.)
Should be “no back seat“.
Hey!