In a report required by the War Powers Resolution, President Obama for the first time acknowledged that the US has taken “direct action” in Somalia and Yemen to attack remnants of Al Qaeda, spreading the battlefield authorized by the AUMF passed shortly after the September 11 attacks in 2001.
In the letter, the President updates Congress on US deployments in the fight against Al Qaeda. Here’s the key section:
In Somalia, the U.S. military has worked to counter the terrorist threat posed by al-Qa’ida and al-Qa’ida-associated elements of al-Shabaab. In a limited number of cases, the U.S. military has taken direct action in Somalia against members of al-Qa’ida, including those who are also members of al-Shabaab, who are engaged in efforts to carry out terrorist attacks against the United States and our interests.
The U.S. military has also been working closely with the Yemeni government to operationally dismantle and ultimately eliminate the terrorist threat posed by al-Qa’ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), the most active and dangerous affiliate of al-Qa’ida today. Our joint efforts have resulted in direct action against a limited number of AQAP operatives and senior leaders in that country who posed a terrorist threat to the United States and our interests.
Everyone knows that the US is engaged in these practices, but this is the first time it has been admitted in a formal setting. And practically speaking, the letter acknowledges the drone program. After all, there’s no “direct action” in the sense of a military deployment in Somalia and Yemen. So that leaves only covert operations like drone strikes. The government also acknowledged a hostage rescue operation in January 2012 in Somalia that resulted in the recovery of Jessica Buchanan from Somali pirates.
The letter also says that there are currently 90,000 troops in Afghanistan. By the end of summer, the Administration has committed to drop that number to 68,000, and “reductions will continue at a steady pace” after that, according to the letter.
The US has 2,748 prisoners in Afghanistan currently. Within the next six months those prisoners are to be transferred to the Afghans, per an agreement with the Karzai government. The letter states that the US holds 169 detainees in the prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
In addition to Somalia and Yemen, the report highlights other US deployments around the world. The military has 90 combat-equipped personnel in Uganda, advising in the effort to bring Joseph Kony and other members of the Lord’s Resistance Army into captivity. “These forces, however, will not engage LRA forces except in self-defense,” according to the letter. There are 693 troops in Egypt, left over from a multinational force that has been there since 1981. And there are 817 troops in Kosovo, as part of a NATO-led peacekeeping force that has been in effect since 1999. Thankfully, this piece is also included:
The United States completed its responsible withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iraq in December 2011, in accordance with the 2008 Agreement Between the United States of America and the Republic of Iraq on the Withdrawal of United States Forces from Iraq and the Organization of Their Activities during Their Temporary Presence in Iraq.
This unclassified version of the War Powers Report comes with a more classified version, which apparently has more details on the “direct actions” against Somalia and Yemen.
I suppose it’s nice to know now that, while we’ve subtracted one country from our warmaking menu, we’ve now officially acknowledged the addition of two other countries. Steven Aftergood, echoing other advocates for transparency, acknowledged the small step forward here, saying, “The age of secret wars is over. They were never a secret to those on the receiving end.”




41 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
There’s something like 15-20 spook/military actions (aka wars) that O is engaged in:
Iraq (think all the troops are gone? I doubt it)
Afghanistan
Pakistan
Yemen
Somalia
4 central African countries
Libya
Syria
Iran
Mexico
Colombia
Peru
What did I forget?
Plus I don’t believe the #s for Kosovo. Bondsteel is one of the biggest U.S. foreign bases (out of 750+ that USG acknowledges & prolly over 1000 in reality).
Moving into China Sea & building a base in Chile. Gotta make sure BR
IC don’t get too big for their britches.Threatening to get involved in Georgia & Azerbaijan as part of the Russian strategy that Romney referred to a week or so ago.
That’s the downside of getting mostly out of Iraq & Afghanistan. It leaves U.S. military free to muck about in all sorts of other countries.
Wonder what they have planned for Chavez, Correa & Morales now that ME is no longer sucking all the wind. Surely they will not be allowed to survive.
Here’s the link to Georgia & Azerbaijan, near end of interview. http://antiwar.com/radio/2012/06/10/eric-margolis-64/
The question for me is: “Given that we rightfully deplore in general expanding wars, and the secret variety in general, what is to be done about the other fact revealed by this letter, which is that al-Qaid’a is in these places?”
The Obama team is doing what it is supposed to do (unlike would be the case with the previous Bush team) which is keep Congress aware of US military actions. That is actually a good sign, that this letter contains this information.
But again, for those of us who don’t like what we’re hearing about more and more war, we need to present an alternative way of dealing with the very real terrorist organizations working in these places, that actively want to attack the US, or allies. You can’t just say “I don’t like war, so do nothing.” Nor can you say “Well, let Yemen deal with the problem on its own.” because apparently that resulted in terrorist organizations taking root in Yemen to begin with.
So what options remain for dealing with the reality of real, credibly threatening terrorist organizations operating in these places?
The question I would like answered is are these real “organizations” or are they a bunch of rag-tag people who want to consider themselves terrorists and just blow up a few local things? We need to know this IMO.
Not to mention that they are of little threat to the U.S. in any event.
And that U.S. use of drones creates more terrorists than it kills (self-licking ice cream cone).
Plus in the U.S. more people are killed by dogs in most years than are killed by terriss. Suggesting:
1. Replace dogs with terriss as man’s best friend.
2. Repurpose DoHS into rounding up stray dogs.
Certainly one option would be to have the drone bombings and other warmaking programs run through the Department of Defense, with full Congressional oversight and clear lines of responsibility, rather than run them secretly from the White House without oversight.
Here’s a Guardian article on U.S. adventures in Africa.
Many of these are prolly proxy wars against China.
1. Why do you think congress would exercise any oversight?
2. I’m not sure of this, but I think JSOC is completely out of any congressional oversight anyhow.
U.S. military has completed plans for attacking Syria.
The bitter irony of Somalia is that a lot of European nations want to see it remain a lawless mess because they can then keep overfishing its territorial waters as well as using them as dumping grounds for European trash.
Nice combination: catch garbage fed fish.
“There are 693 troops in Egypt, left over from a multinational force that has been there since 1981.” Since 1981? What the hell are they doing there and what is the justification for them being there? The Egyptian people have enough problems w/o U.S. soldiers being around. Oh, maybe this is why. And such also shows why the U.S. is against a real peoples democracy in Egypt.
Syria was one of the 7 countries targeted for regime change per Gen. Wesley Clark. Jeremy Scahill revealed this information in.re. Somalia and Yemen months ago on Democracy Now. The US has “Special Ops” teams infesting the world. Thanks for the list @1. We can only hope this is an indication of the coming demise of empire.
USA. Inc. prefers stability to democracy, as exhibited by our support for autocratic governments worldwide.
“…who are engaged in efforts to carry out terrorist attacks against the United States and our interests.” And what exactly are our interests? This is so vague that it could encompass anything from protecting allies (i.e. Israel) to punishing avowed enemies (i.e. Iran) to maintaining a hegemony of resource procurement (corporate exploitation), and so on. Speaking of enemies, aren’t we just creating more of them by killing a lot of innocent people?
In answer to the question of what other methods could be employed by the U.S. to deal with suspected and real “terrorists,” including Pakistani villagers, Somali pirates (dispossessed fishermen), the Palestinians, etc. — how about using some of those vast military resources to help the people survive, build a functional infrastructure, and have a decent life for themselves and their children? How about more humanitarian aid to these poorest and most oppressed populations, instead of always letting them languish or kicking them in the teeth? Oh… but that’s not a major one of “our interests”.
That same priority of “security” with surveillance and militarization is being forced on us in our “homeland,” and one has to wonder whose interests are being protected and furthered.
Blum in Killing Hope has a different take on the goals of U.S. mucking about in other countries, installing dictators. It’s to make it possible for U.S. corps to loot the countries, not for stability per se.
The U.S. military always makes things worse for the 99ers in the other countries. Completely unblemished record in that regard.
So the way that the U.S. military could help the 99ers in other countries is by staying out of them altogether.
Not that that’s an option.
you forgot
the Phillipines.
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Southeast_Asia/NB29Ae01.html
“US drones circle over the Philippines
By Jacob Zenn
A United States-supported airstrike that destroyed with causalities an Abu Sayyaf hideout on the remote island of Jolo in the southern Philippines represented the first known use of the unmanned aerial assault craft in the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) counter-insurgency operations against terrorism-linked rebel groups.
The drone attack early this month reportedly killed 15 Abu Sayyaf and Jemaah Islamiyah operatives, including three most-wanted terrorist leaders – Zulkifli bin Hir (alias Marwan), Gumbahali Jumdail (alias Doc Abu), and Mumanda Ali (alias Muawayah) – and raised the level of US-Philippine military cooperation. “
edit
How about the Marshall Plan, the Berlin Airlift? I know that’s old history, but it’s exemplary.
That Clark snippet is a good one.
In addition to Scahill, there is wall-to-wall coverage of Yemen, Somalia on antiwar.com. Scott Horton does good interviews.
I think since I’ve been watching the situation in the past 4-5 years, the U.S. has overthrown about 3 or 4 govts in Somalia, including one where Ethiopia acted as U.S. proxy, and Kenyans are now U.S. proxies. Islamic Courts was one of the few relatively stable ones, but the U.S. couldn’t endure that.
And the U.S. history in Somalia goes back a lot longer than I’ve been following it.
Good addition.
Philippine operations, including one a year or two after 9/11, tend to be small so they drop off my screen. I think there were 40 terris involved in the earlier one. U.S. just can’t seem to stir up enough trouble there to keep U.S. military busy.
The U.S. military no longer engages in any countries its own size, only shitty little ones it can toss into a wall.
I don’t know a lot about the Marshall Plan, but do know that there was a great controversy in the U.S. at the time about whether to impose a WWI type surrender on Germany, completely deindustrializing it. Smarter heads prevailed in the end, but it was touch & go.
I read a biography of Adenauer, thinking that might give me better insight, but it was one of those first-he-did-this-then-he-did-that that was not very revealing. He was right of center, so he passed the U.S. smell test, and perhaps that’s what tipped the balance.
I’ll grant you the airlift. So there’s one, anyhow.
Oh, I just remembered something else about the Marshall Plan. It was primarily (some one correct me if I’m wrong) a way of building up buffers against the Soviets. They were not included (I forget why) even though they were the ones most responsible for winning the war in Europe. Lost millions of soldiers as well as all that materiel. So MP was a way of strengthening countries around USSR, while keeping it poor.
Installing autocratic regimes ensures the stability that allows the US corps to loot the natural resources, while the Banksters will promote debt enslavement. It’s all so neo-colonial.
Ding.
Another way of characterizing it is that it is just the global version of what the 1%ers do to the 99ers within their own countries. What’s the point of being an empire if you can’t loot the serfs.
I think we’re involved in the repression of freedom in Indonesia, as well.
Book Salon up with Van Jone’s Rebuild the Dream hosted by Southern Dragon
If we’ve returned to the Middle Ages, can a forced regression to the Dark Ages be far behind?
Sounds familiar, but I’m not up on that one.
They’re trying with privatization of elementary & secondary schools. There was a description of what goes on in one of those elementary school classrooms that I read a couple of days ago: watching computer screens or maybe just a big screen in the front of the room, watching mostly commercials and the ‘lesson’ quality dumbed down. Gave me the creeps.
You know that the Laders, FOBs, started the Renaissance weekend gigs. After they proved successful, the right wing tried gearing up Dark Ages weekends. I kid you not. Think those belly flopped after a year or two.
I’ll admit it’s hard to keep track of the proliferation of our meddling. I can only hope that Correa, Morales, and Chavez can successfully continue to thwart US influence. If Brazil and Argentina support and band together with them, it is possible.
The privatization for profit of the education system is the death knell for this country. If one thinks that the citizenry is ignorant now, it’ll only get worse.
Van Jones? Too bad a progressive author wasn’t available.
Gotta go, the lawn needs mowing again.
One of the more interesting developments in the past decade was Chavez’s ability to withstand the U.S. backed coup. But now he’s sick, so we’ll see.
Venezuela has just passed the Saudis in having the largest proven oil reserves. It’s gunky, sulfury stuff, quite unlike high quality Saudi crude, but there’s a lot of it.
Gotta keep it out of the hands of someone who might give some to the poor.
Good one. I’m lurking for another little while. So far he’s said nothing of interest. Thinks lefties should form yet ANOTHER organization.
Right. Like that’ll work THIS time.
FWIW, that has never been a criterion for someone to be invited as a Book Salon guest.
Today FDL “welcomes” Van Jones…
Next week, Rahm?
Domo Arigato, Mr. O-bot-o!
Domo Arigato, Mr. O-bot-o!
Oh, btw, Van says that no “Veal Pen” organizations have tried to co-opt Occupy. Pull the other one, Van; it plays “Don’t Stop”. Sheesh.
“The Obama team is doing what it is supposed to do (unlike would be the case with the previous Bush team) which is keep Congress aware of US military actions.”
The BIG problem with your argument generally — that we have to do SOMEthing about these real terrorist organizations — is that it’s largely irrelevant to the issue at hand. Even the Obama administration has admitted it doesn’t know who it’s killing, so surely Congress doesn’t know, just as surely you don’t, and that doesn’t even get to the matter of where the presumed information to kill someone comes from or how it’s vetted. Marcy Wheeler has been making the cogent case, for example, that the Saudis tell us who to aim for in Yemen — and the Saudis have their own agenda there. But all of that troubling mischief is inherent in the assent to an executive that is a wholly independent and self-justifying War Machine. Which is not my understanding of what the executive branch “is supposed to do.”
What a smarmy character Jones is.
I just came back from eating dinner & scanned comments.
Not only are his useless, it is an hour & 45 minutes into the salon & no one has brought up Citizen’s United.
The problem you refer to is general. If U.S. relies on non-CIA source for intel, they always have their own agenda. That’s how the U.S. got so many innocents in Gitmo: family feuds, settled once & for all. If you let it up to the CIA, they know nothing about the geography & people they are dealing with, just like U.S. soldiers know nothing about who to shoot in an insurgency.
Quiet police action, working with local authorities if possible, is the way to go. It may not be very effective and it may take a long time, but at least it doesn’t create more enemies.