The Wall Street Journal gets around to noticing that the latest version of HARP, the Home Affordable Refinance Program, has been manipulated by the leading mortgage servicers to trap their borrowers. And they add a bit of a twist. Because servicers set the fees from closings on refinances, this trapping of their borrowers also happens to be quite lucrative.
Banks that collect those payments, known as mortgage servicers, could get as much as $12 billion in revenue this year refinancing mortgages under the federal Home Affordable Refinance Program, or HARP, according to data compiled by Nomura Holdings Inc.
Borrowers who refinance mortgages through HARP, on the other hand, stand to save between $2.5 billion and $5 billion this year, according to an analysis by The Wall Street Journal of Nomura’s figures [...]
That is because the new HARP rules make it easier for borrowers to refinance their loans with existing lenders. That, the critics say, allows large lenders to charge a captive customer base above-market interest rates on the refinanced loans. Borrowers refinancing through their existing lender make up about 75% of HARP refinancings, according to government figures.
“There’s essentially a monopoly on refinancing,” Housing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Donovan said at a Senate hearing last month. For borrowers, Mr. Donovan said, “Whoever holds their current loan, whoever is the servicer, they can charge them—and we’re seeing this—very high fees.”
Donovan has gradually come around to this admission, which was evident right from the beginning. The big banks restrict their underwater borrowers, by only allowing refis above a certain loan-to-value ratio on loans they already service. As a result, they can charge more, on average about a 0.53% premium, according to Amherst Securities.
Here’s the kicker, the story relates that the Administration wanted FHFA to force the banks to open up refinancing on these loans to spur competition. These are loans owned and/or guaranteed by Fannie and Freddie, so they should be able to get this done. FHFA refused, at least according to this unnamed Administration official. Even now, FHFA claims that refis are going out at the market rate. But this is preposterous. It defies common sense that you can get a loan where your only option is one broker for the same price as a loan where there’s a competitive marketplace for the service.
It’s true that a borrower paying a 6% interest rate on a loan will welcome a 4.5% interest rate, even if 3.75% is the market rate. But the rate they’re receiving is artificial, created through a monopoly. And the cost difference is going right into the pockets of the big banks. It’s not like banks aren’t ALREADY getting major incentives to refinance through the new HARP. It costs a bank next to nothing to refinance an existing borrower, and some of those requirements were waived by the new HARP. Plus, the banks get a waiver of liability on representation and warranty claims on the underlying loans. That waiver is a massive in-kind subsidy. But banks have found a way to spin even more profit out of this.




18 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
That fresh ink on the new unadulterated note that is foreclosure enforceable and won’t be lost this time, is the key. Romney won’t have a better deal, so what else can you do in a jurisdiction that sends the sheriff?
And the beat goes on.
For many years when I sold real estate, the VA and FHA would allow a change to a lower interest rate for a small amount of money and no processing fees. It was not necessary to create another scam in a government program unless no one remembers how to behave with decency.
Making money the old-fashioned way. Letting the Obama administration steal it for you.
Well what’s new…..Anything coming from Obum will of course squeeze ordinary Americans…..and nary a member of Dem congressional clique is aware of this eh ?
Wake up people…we did not get to this point cuz of GOP hands alone…..The Dems were right there & is right there helping to eff us over.
Yep, so true
Harp loans are not to depend on credit score – but the rate offered appears to vary by credit score – and the rate offered is never near the market – and the “costs” of the refi are multiple thousands, albeit always just added to the loan for most of the charges – and Chase will not on its own offer a refi Harp to any who have had a refi Harp post 2008 – so if you got that 2009 5.5% refi Harp you are SOL on getting a lower rate now.
My first hypothesis these days is that any govt program is designed to rip off the poor & other depressed. It’s just a Q of finding out how.
And the beat-down goes on. Fixed it for you.
The true meaning of bi-partisanship revealed. A concerted effort to screw the 99% for the benefit of the 1%.
It apears there is a conspiracy of the government to overthrow the people.
That’a an interesting twist I hadn’t considered.
See my #11. We were apparenbtly thinging the same thing at the same time.
Now that’s spooky.
And just when you think it can’t get any worse, they come up with a new scam to further impoverish us. The vampires won’t even realize their mistake until there’s no source of human blood left to sustain their lives.
Ever since you had your epiphany in.re. support for the “Democrats”, we do seem to be thinking in parallel. Soon I won’t even have to comment, I’ll just lurk and watch you post my thoughts.
Well…once again…I am glad I didn’t refi…I just keep hanging on by the skin of my teeth.
Or vice versa.
Hermit is right..
Obama will announce a govt lending program for undewater&credit impaired owners- the ostensible reason- ‘to help poor little guy’s
Repubs will lambaste this as a political year move- but cooperate funding wise if needed
The real reason: to nullify chain of title cataclysm caused by MERS&banks by requiring forced quite title and an agreement from borrowers to not challenge title chains
Those who expect Obama to do anything other than protect the wealth of the cleptocrats who own him are naive and now, facilitators and cooperators in the dismantling of the American middle-class
HARP versions have been around for a while now, but I at least have not noticed a lot of lawyers burning down the ‘net talking about its chain of title effects. And it does seem as if one would tune a program having as an objective the remedy of that situation so that more than a relative handful of the affected properties would qualify.
So, have any lawyers anywhere addressed the idea that HARP 2.0 is a stealth attack on the chain of title problem? Perhaps one could be so engaged … wouldn’t want any zombie seeds germinating on us later.