A new trove of Clinton and Bush-era documents from the CIA have been released to the National Security Archive, and they show that the CIA had a bead on Osama bin Laden a year before 9/11, but did not receive adequate funding from the Bush White House in the early months of his first term to pursue him. In fact, they had to stop monitoring him.
The CIA materials directly contradict the many claims of Bush officials that it was aggressively pursuing al-Qaida prior to 9/11, and that nobody could have predicted the attacks. “I don’t think the Bush administration would want to see these released, because they paint a picture of the CIA knowing something would happen before 9/11, but they didn’t get the institutional support they needed,” says Barbara Elias-Sanborn, the NSA fellow who edited the materials.
The CIA tracked bin Laden with unmanned aerial vehicles starting in September 2000. But funding concerns scrapped the program, as the strategy shifted to persuading allies among Afghan tribal leaders or the Northern Alliance to capture or kill bin Laden. The Air Force announced that they would charge the CIA for any drone they lost in an operation against bin Laden, causing the CIA to pull back.
The documents also show the level of early warnings about Al Qaeda operations in 2001:
From June to September 2001, a full seven CIA Senior Intelligence Briefs detailed that attacks were imminent, an incredible amount of information from one intelligence agency. One from June called “Bin-Ladin and Associates Making Near-Term Threats” writes that “[redacted] expects Usama Bin Laden to launch multiple attacks over the coming days.” The famous August brief called “Bin Ladin Determined to Strike the US” is included. “Al-Qai’da members, including some US citizens, have resided in or travelled to the US for years, and the group apparently maintains a support structure here,” it says. During the entire month of August, President Bush was on vacation at his ranch in Texas — which tied with one of Richard Nixon’s as the longest vacation ever taken by a president. CIA Director George Tenet has said he didn’t speak to Bush once that month, describing the president as being “on leave.”
The Clinton Administration doesn’t get off blameless either. A December 4, 1998, President’s Daily Brief describes a “test-run” for 9-11, where Al Qaeda members evade security restrictions at an airpot in New York. A January 2000 briefing memo predicts “weeks… months… but no more than one year” before an Al Qaeda attack.
The archive can be found here. The editors stress that the materials remain redacted, and that they only add up to 1/4 of the materials from the CIA in generating the 9/11 Commission Report. None of the 47 reports of CIA interrogation sessions with 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed are included, so aspects of torture do not factor in here.





68 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Why was this material not destroyed in Cheney’s office fire.
More seriously, more records survived from W than I expected.
None of it contains surprising info so far.
In viewing recent history, many of the negative events could have been avoided by policy makers. We are paying the burden of those costs…which are heavy and will last years. So why has the policies remained in effect? The global wars, the global economic meltdown and growing inequality?
Not surprising at all. How many lives lost and destroyed, how much money shoveled to Haliburton, all because the Shrub wanted to clear brush more than do his damn job. But, you know, looking forward and all that…
Willful ignorance.
Commie threat was deader than dead. Shock doctrine had imploded Russia. MIIC needed a new threat to justify its existence. Terriss were U.S. BFF. Why not provoke them into an attack.
Just as U.S. provoked Saddam Hussein into attacking Kuwait so the MIIC didn’t have suffer a peace dividend.
The warning lights were blinking red. So the CIA turned them off.
We witnesses zero political costs (consequences) to the Rethug Party (and Individual R players) which dropped the ball and allowed US to be attacked.
Would Obama and his team of Fascists likewise “benefit”?
Perhaps.
Two things are certain.
The event allowed the MIC to “bankrupt” the treasury. (In reality, it allowed the treasury to print pallet loads of currency with which to inundate the MIC – which the MIC uses in part to fund “the enemy” in a perpetual Catch 22. Note that the amount of currency printed is so vast that it became too embarrassing and too ridiculous for the Federal Government to publish.)
The event allowed both Parties to eviscerate our civil rights and engage a Permanent Police State with no end in sight.
One thing I did not understand about after 9/11 (was 5 miles away from WTC) was why it turned Americans into chauvinists. The USG had failed on the one job that is definitely their prime duty: to defend the country from attack. It instantly turned me against the USG. Wouldn’t fly a U.S. flag nor exhibit any other signs of so-called patriotism.
All the people dead because Bush was an idiot but Cheney isn’t an idiot and he would have known all about the warnings. His plan worked perfectly.
The real 9-11 truth is that there were people who knew and they benefited by doing nothing to stop it. They need to all be tried and hung for treason.
Dick Cheney is hung like a horse.
Cheney didn’t burn the evidence of his treason bc why bother?? No consequences & the Big Dick just sneers: SO???
IOKIYAR of course.
Yep, but won’t happen. Sibel Edmonds talks about in her book, there were fbi and cia assest warning about the coming attack and other countries but as you pointed it out they needed to happen.
Bin Laden was the best thing that ever happened to the 1%. 9/11 was a gift, the perfect excuse they needed to build their fascist state of spying, control, and endless war.
Even Baby Bush said that 9/11 represented hitting the Trifecta for him.
The sad truth, though, is that no matter how much of this information comes out, Bush will do down in history as “the decisive leader who did what he had to to keep this country safe.”
I actually doubt that, but it’s too late now to matter.
These documents seem to confirm LIHOP (“let it happen on purpose”) which used to be beyond the scope of respectable discourse.
The bold-faced lies about WMD opened a lot of people’s eyes to the possibility that USG is not the innocent dupe it made itself out to be.
And enough came out earlier, like Rice’s filibustering the 8/6 hair-on-fire PDB (such a bad performance; where was Rove when she needed him) to raise the probability of that hypothesis.
It also enabled Lieberman to pimp for the creation of the Dept. of Homeland Insecurity. The rush to implement the security state was instrumental in reviving the Israeli economy as they were ahead of the pack in being able to provide the required technology.
And Obama should be remembered as the one to not implement holding Bush/Cheney accountable for extreme negligence and war crimes.
The reason they had that much time was because the Clinton Administration’s spotting and defusing of the Millenium Plot disrupted Al-Qaeda’s infrastructure enough to make planning difficult for months afterwards, as the full NSA quote indicates:
It turned out that stopping the Millenium Plot bought 20 months of time.
Imagine if Gore had been allowed to claim his 2000 victory. He would have left in place Clinton’s national security team, so instead of Sandy Berger being blown off by Condi Rice when he and Richard Clarke tried to get her to give a crap about Al-Qaeda, Berger and Clarke would still have been on the job, if for no other reason than Gore wouldn’t have wanted to try and get any appointment nominations past a hostile Republican Senate.
Sandy Berger and Richard Clarke wouldn’t have been blowing off the CIA. And both Kenneth Williams’ and Coleen Rowley’s warnings would have been heeded in real time, not ignored — perhaps long enough to arrest all the 9/11 plotters before they got into the air to execute their plot.
It confirms the stupidity and evil of the Bushistas. Then again, so did Ron Suskind’s book The One Percent Doctrine, wherein we see not just Bush, but Bush’s entire national security apparatus, blowing off warnings not just from the CIA but from Sandy Berger — who they would go on to punish for being right.
It also confirms that the establishment media was in bed with the GOP from the get-go. Anyone doubt that, had this happened on Gore’s watch, instead of reinforcing the natural circle-the-wagons, rally-round-our-leaders feeling that followed, the media would be instead amplifying Republican calls for Gore’s impeachment?
I’d note for the record that Scheuer didn’t think much of Clinton’s record on OBL.
Mitt Romney thinks Dubya was a ‘fantastic’ president.
If Independents don’t know which candidate for president to trust, then this alone should help them disqualify Romney.
Obama is moving America FORWARD.
Nor did Richard Clarke think much of Scheuer’s ability to manage (and vice versa) the work against Al Qaeda.
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2004/11/path-to-9-11-200411
Nor do I think much of Richard Clarke. Self-promoting BFF of Judith Miller.
Not to mention that he wrote one of the worst spy thrillers ever. http://www.amazon.com/The-Scorpions-Gate-Richard-Clarke/dp/0399152946/ref=sr_1_5?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1340238698&sr=1-5&keywords=richard+clarke+books
If he keeps moving the USA “FORWARD”, pretty soon only property owners will be allowed to vote and the serfs will become slaves.
Clarke’s a legend in his own mind and the darling of the MSM propaganda machine.
Check.
Standing up to W in the post 9/11 world made Clarke look good.
Standing shoulder to shoulder to (post Libbygate) Judy does not help Clarke’s image, I agree.
Not unlike the hagiography when Gerald Ford died: “He brought this country together by pardoning Nixon, thus ending our long national nightmare and making us forget all that nasty business.” Blerg.
She was at Clarke book signing I went to. While he was signing my book, I told him that I understood they were good friends but it didn’t behoove him to show up in public with her. Bookstore minder blanched. Clarke didn’t care what I said.
…Bookstore minder blanched.
I’ll bet…! ;-)
I said it in my best library voice…
I don’t believe the CIA then or now, why would any sane person believe an agency built on lying ?
How disappointed I am that David could not remember the articles I published through Firedoglake recounting the revelations of a military intelligence professional regarding the work his team did in regards to pre-9/11 intelligence on Al Qaeda, the Taliban, and Bin Laden, intelligence that was briefed as well to the CIA. The accusations of this intelligence professional resulted in a DoD Inspector General report, which I analyzed, and found clear evidence of a cover up, just as this intelligence professional claimed, regarding information on pre-9/11 intelligence sent to the 2002 Joint Congressional Inquiry into the 9/11 terrorist attacks.
The documents recently released to the National Security Archive are heavily redacted, and limited to the CIA, leaving the totality of US government intelligence on Bin Laden et al. quite limited in revelatory impact. It is of some interest, of course, that the CIA was slowing the hunt for Bin Laden, but that is not actually new information. There was a lot of obstruction going on, and not to mention it in the context of this new FOIA release is to do the public a disservice. I should also note the revelations surrounding the CIA and NSA knowledge of the Al Qaeda phone hub in Yemen, and the entry of 9/11 terrorists Al Hamzi and Al Midhar into the U.S., where they went and stayed with an FBI asset in San Diego well before 9/11. Important to mention in this context, eh? But no one does.
Yes, never mind, because the narrative surrounding this latest release has the imprimatur of official knowledge via the Salon article (and the NSA’s own description of what it received), and even David Dayen cannot reference the work done, for instance, by an FDL investigator, as I was at that point.
I suggest readers take a look at my 9/10/11 article from FDL, the most recent of my series of investigations into this issue, “IG Report Cover-up: Top Military Officials Hid Evidence of Pre-9/11 Al Qaeda Intelligence.” But this was not a one-time article/coverage at Firedoglake, as this article from June 2011 demonstrates, or this one from May 2011.
Evidently, Mr. Dayen did not read or absorb these articles. But to give him credit, neither did very many others, who are in thrall to the official narrative, and since I’m not part of the official club that gets recognized, the Veal Pen in other words, what I write is not of much importance. What bitter irony for a site that prides itself on criticizing the Veal Pen.
I make the record here for those who are interested (and now some of you will understand one reason I basically stopped posting here — The main articles on the JFIC/Iron Man/9/11 story were published at Truthout, and some co-written by Jason Leopold, so maybe that somehow made this aspect of the story “under the radar” for FDL writers.) Be that as it may, I continue my investigations, looking at important documents, and trying to track down what actually happened. I intend to publish soon the latest result of such investigations, which will link key figures in the cover-up of what military intelligence was doing around the hunt for Bin Laden, with the implementation of the SERE-based torture program. Such information was always there for anyone to investigate and make the links, but frankly, no one really gives a damn or is willing to make the effort to do more than sound righteous and retrweet, or repackage the work done by a few. Whether it’s important or moves the narrative forward, or fits with what is known, who cares? Right?
I doubt what I write will be covered here by FDL, unless someone picks it up in the major press (although I should credit Kevin and a few commenters for picking up this kind of info now and then). What a shame the pretensions of what FDL stands for do not live up to what they claim.
Thanks for all the details. One question remains: who was responsible for the controlled demolition which imploded World Trade Center Buildings 1, 2, and 7?
good,spot on comments eCAHNnomics upthread…
9/11/2001 opened a portal that whether fully staged or partially staged by allied interests once opened allowed much of what followed during 2002 leading into the Hitlerian styled “fake attack by Poland” outcome that befell Baghdad and Iraq in early 2003. Saddam had been a American pet dictator during the Iran/Iraq War in the 1980′s and surely Saddam had more than a few pieces of real American ME history kept in safe places WashingtonDC and it’s two attack dogs — the Pentagon and CIA were not averse to boxing up and hiding somewhere else beyond Saddam’s reach. Saddam was no dummy as real ME dictators cannot be dummies and have very long or successful dictator careers. In truth and fact Saddam surely had very little if anything to do with 9/11 but Iraq was the Hot Topic very soon after the year 2002 started unreeling. Saddam was given no quarter by WashingtonDC and the Iraqi WMD hoax was soon exposed for the hoax it was.
Blaming Bush for 9/11 is some good fodder for the D vs. R partisans but again that has become a stale,off point and frankly boring pov here in 2012.
The D Party members in Congress could have made political life hellish for G.W.Bush and R.B.Cheney from early to mid 2002 onwards just on the raw political power of blaming Bush and Cheney for 9/11 and mounting endless Congressional inquisition theatre productions which G.W.Bush surely would have soon flubbed up over responding to and R.B.Cheney would have fully earned being politically banished for being the Rasputin/Vader he was and is. So let’s stop just blaming those dumbass R’s about 9/11 and stop overlooking what the D’s in Congress were all to eager and willing to let The Decider and Darth Cheney lead the USA into doing to Saddam and Iraq in early 2003. The D’s were worthless as the Opposition Party post 9/11.
Surely Barack Obama could have picked up several batons laying about after Jan.20,2009 dawned and sunseted to go after G.W.Bush and R.B.Cheney and several ranks worth of lower case Bush WH players and court jesters. Obama did not do it. Geeezzz loweezzz…must be the R’s fault again….sheesh…
So what is POTUS Obama ( DINO/UNI/INC.) doing to cool off the warmonger talk that is flying around WashingtonDC these days like mosquitoes at a picnic where everyone forgot to bring some Off? What is POTUS Obama and his Secretary of Hypocrisy Hillary ” I married Bill Clinton so I am going to run for POTUS in 2016 again for the DINO/INC stakeholders of the D Party” Clinton doing? She sure as hell is not looking very sad about all the innocent eldlerly,children and bystander civilians POTUS Obama seems to like to decide get to die as POTUS. But let’s blame that on the R’s too.
We need to elect Barack Obama in November 2012 because if we don’t Barack Obama will not be POTUS anymore after Jan.2013 and will have to suffer his post being POTUS career retirement like William J.Clinton does. I should have to “suffer” so much. Or you should have to “suffer” so much.
But let’s blame it all on those ever stink’in R’s.. …..sheesh…..
Here’s History Commons’ “Complete 911 Timeline” for those interested.
Mahalo, Jeff, for all that you’ve done(and doing)…! And, I’ve read most of what you’ve posted, everywhere you’ve posted…! *g*
AAAAAAAAAAAAUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Thank you. You took the word right out of my mouth.
So let’s stop just blaming those dumbass R’s about 9/11 and stop overlooking what the D’s in Congress were all to eager and willing to let The Decider and Darth Cheney lead the USA into doing to Saddam and Iraq in early 2003. The D’s were worthless as the Opposition Party post 9/11.
Can you say Déjà vu…? Same damn Bat Channel with Iran, only with Congress and Oily Bomber leading the charge…! 8-(
Will the jag-offs of the previous administration be held accountable by the jag-offs in the current administration?
I guess shooter just couldn’t stay away.
A reading of “Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee” would tell anyone all they needed to know about the gummint.
9-11 was our Reichstag fire. And as such, what is far, far more important than who did it or who knew or all the rest of the Monday morning quarterbacking bullshit is what the US decided to do on 9-12.
And oddly enough, according to the mythic public narrative that was constructed about 9-11, the US responded precisely as Osama bin Laden wanted. Imagine that.
In the wake of 9-11 over two-thirds of the US citizenry believed Iraq had something to do with the attack and George W.’s approval ratings were 90%. That’s accounts for almost everyone you know.
So, they’re just suddenly releasing this information?
Yup.
I hope you’re right, but it’s the old line from “Liberty Valence”: “When the legend becomes truth, print the legend.”
Boo-fucking-yakasha!
“I make the record here for those who are interested (and now some of you will understand one reason I basically stopped posting here . . .”
I wondered where you went. FDL is far poorer in your absence. Yours were the articles I read religiously, largely because I learned or thought something new (Gosztola now gets that attention). Where should I look for your work these days? Truthout or . . . ?
Forward into the quagmire of Afghanistan, forward toward hostilities with Iran, forward into indiscriminate murder of civilians by drones, forward into whacking American citizens without a shred of due process, forward to permanent military imprisonment of US citizens, forward into a massive, coordinated nationwide militarized crackdown on Occupy protesters…Yes, nothing says ‘Forward’ quite like Barack Obama.
Yup again.
Mahalo back at ya, CT.
And to @fatster @38, I used to be a big fan of History Commons, but they are quite limited in many ways. This may be a function of lack of manpower, but they have some huge gaps. I’ll be honest, their failure to take on the JFIC story bothered me as well, though they personally told me that it was important. If I would help with their project I could put it in. I don’t suppose that’s how all the stories they do have in HC get there, and besides, I didn’t have the time for that.
But it’s other things as well. They have it quite wrong about the initial approach of DoD to JPRA in Dec. 2001, making it sound like JPRA was really warning DoD about the dangers of using SERE techniques. Hardly so. They were dancing with glee at the chance of getting in on the interrogation action. Read what they say about it here, and then look up similar material in the SASC report on detainee abuse. Truly a shameful performance on an important topic.
From HC:
From Baumgartner’s faxed info to Shiffren in DoD’s GC office, Dec. 2001, from my own coverage in Dec. 2008:
Of course, that did not make HC, either.
“The D Party members in Congress could have . . .”
Every one of the over 500 members of Congress went along with the 2001 AUMF with the sole exception of Barbara Lee. Indeed. Framing this as an R v D issue is worse than useless bullshit.
Kevin writes some good things, so I’m glad if you are reading him. And by no means is FDL without good writers, commenters, etc. And on some issues FDL continues to tell it like it is and do great work.
All I’m saying is that when it comes to certain kinds of material, FDL really doesn’t escape from the mainstream narrative. Of course, I’m emphasizing some of my own pet topics (torture, the Army Field Manual’s Appendix M, and the cover-up on intel pre-9/11), and that is self-serving. I’m not going to deny that. And should it turn out that what I have to say is trivial or not of use to anyone, then I really don’t hurt anyone by continuing to push it. Just another crank posting on some subject or another.
Of course, I don’t see it that way, and I’m going to keep at it. The investigation pieces are coming out at Truthout these days. I may expand that to some other venues, if they will have me, or have interest in the material. One can always look back at my body of work here, or check out my blog Invictus. And, as a posting not too long ago at MyFDL demonstrates, I may occasionally still post here. I’m very narrow in my concerns. I’m very intent on these issues, mainly because of the lies and the spin that prevent accountability, that inures the public to a narrative that is false, to protect criminals in high places.
Jeff, are you still posting at NewsHoggers, and have you seen this recent BBC article from Adam Curtis…?
How To Kill A Rational Peasant–America’s Dangerous Love Affair With Counter Insurgency
Ha. “Doesn’t escape the mainstream narrative” indeed.
Those “pet topics” are the cornerstone of the whole shithouse. Keep at it. You’re doing the Lord’s work. These “criminals in high places” march without conscience on a road of bones.
I’ll check out Invictus. Thanks!
Couple of things, CT. One, I never posted at NewsHoggers, so if they posted something of mine there, they picked up without my permission (though they may have had the permission of the originating source, IDK).
That looks like a very interesting (and long) article on Counterinsurgency history and I’ll take a fuller look later tonight or tomorrow.
Finally, and oddly enough, I wrote about the Jack Idema story last year, and even posted a video of waterboarding that supposedly came from his Afghanistan sites (see here). I don’t know if I believe all the hype around him, which seems quite hysterical. Even his death from AIDS at some luxury villa in Mexico’s Caribe seems possibly false. His ex-wife wrote to me after my article. I don’t really understand what she was saying.
Perhaps they were all crazy, but I will say he was pretty well-connected. One of these connections, which I discuss in my article, was Maj. Gen. Jack Holbein (retired), who does figure prominently in the JFIC/JFCOM 9/11 story, and in the JPRA torture story. The latter is a part of what I’m writing about currently, and will be an article at Truthout in the near future.
WRT your comments in general, there is little institutional memory at FDL. There have been some very good posters & commenters here.
This is ultimately a societal problem, and it comes from a government and ruling elite in whose interest it is to make sure our memory is partial at best, and full of particular gaps.
Remember those memory chutes in the movie Brazil?
Thank you for your work, Jeff, and for the reminders.
Jeff, I’m glad you posted the links to your prior posts. I don’t recall seeing those posts when you first wrote them.
Sometimes the information on FDL is so quickly refreshed, that if I have a busy week, I don’t always read far back enough to catch all posts.
I’ve been spreading the word about the Army Field Manual’s Appendix M loophole to everyone who will listen.
I haven’t reached a critical mass yet but still keep at it.
With respect to institutional memory, you and eCAHNomics bring up an issue that I think FDL could tackle: developing a system (ex, timeline with hot links, summary essay, or evolving outline with links) of big stories to which our readers (newcomers and regulars) could revisit as new information is discovered. Those could be kept on the right hand column of the FDL page at all times for easy access, keeping important posts like yours in the institutional memory for years to come.
Or, since wikipedia does this type of aggregation story anyway, in the short run, perhaps FDL could encourage people to update wikipedia with links to well-researched FDL posts. At Truthout you could do the same, if you are not doing so already.
This kind of institutional memory will help inform readers’ questions during book salons (or White House Press Conferences if and when FDL obtains a press pass), or will provide quick supporting evidence when met with disbelief.
To be an lever for driving the narrative towards the truth when the government would rather obfuscate, we could juxtapose quotes from on-the-record interviews by FDL members of government leaders with this summary to demonstrate government spin or sincerity.
Always glad to read your well researched posts.
Good point. I’ve noticed that but hadn’t couched it in those terms.
It’s about power…
Thanks so much for the updates on History Commons’ 9/11 Timeline, Jeff Kaye. I’m certainly saving your comment.
As a kid, I memorized “Invictus.” If that’s where you’re coming from, great.
Thanks for the comments, eCAHN, fatster, greenharper, pdaly, etc.
I do think it’s also worth noting that the website IntelWire posted almost exactly the same documents NSA did, having FOIA’d the 9/11 Commission referenced docs (again, as NSA did).
It’s sad that NSA did not credit Intelwire for the earlier work, as they posted their material on May 31 this year. See http://news.intelwire.com/search/label/9-11
This is not an endorsement of IntelWire over NSA; they both do great work.
On page 33 of one of the documents, there is a listing of the Counterterrorist organizations.
It is called “Table 5″. You can look for the image here:
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/368906-1994-10-office-of-inspector-general-inspection.html
The agencies are listed in alphabetical order. The image of Table 5 shows just one agency whited out. It sits between “Immigration and Naturalization Service” and “(Department of) Justice.”
I immediately wondered what agency would need to maintain its secrecy and be whited out?
“JFIC” fits…
or what about “Israel”? ;-)
I’ve typed out list from Table 5 below, and I left a blank line with a ‘?’ between INS and Justice to represent the whited-out name:
I’m curious now.
I don’t know what it is, but its not JFIC.
The document is dated 1994. JFIC is part of the Joint Forces Command, which wasn’t formed until around 1999.
I’m almost certain that the missing organization is the Intelligence Support Activity (ISA) of the US Army Special Operations Forces, its intelligence arm. Their actual name is classified each year and changes from year to year. ISA is what they were called years ago (including the date this document was written), so its what one can speak of and know your referent. I remember one name for it was Gray Fox.
But it’s always been highly secret — they’re the guys who go into Abbotabad before the Seals arrive (for instance).