I guess Alan Simpson and his recurring set of bad manners has become too much of a liability to those intrepid grand bargaineers. So he’s been pulled for a reliever. Enter Judd Gregg, himself just out of the Senate.
Former Sen. Judd Gregg (N.H.) is stepping up his role in building Republican support for a broad deficit-reduction plan.
Some lawmakers who want to pass a comprehensive deficit-reduction package at the end of this year or in early 2013 say Gregg has more influence within the Senate GOP conference than does former Sen. Alan Simpson (R-Wyo.), the co-chairman of the Simpson-Bowles commission.
Gregg and former White House chief of staff Erskine Bowles, the Democratic co-chairman of the commission created in 2010 by President Obama, met with a bipartisan group of about three dozen senators Tuesday afternoon to discuss deficit cutting.
Must be sad for Simpson, taken over by a younger, taller, more vivacious model.
Here’s the thing on Judd Gregg, who pushed for the original catfood commission as the ranking member on the Senate Budget Committee, when it was Conrad-Gregg (that was the panel that President Obama endorsed, prompting a bunch of Republicans to immediately vote against it, leading to the establishment of Bowles-Simpson): his first job out of the Senate, as a young senior looking to make it on his own, was with Goldman Sachs, as a “strategic advisor.”
So now, the two men working to influence a deficit reduction plan in Washington work for Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley. Surely those two will create a set of policies that take into account the struggles of the working man and the hardships of retirement. Most Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley executives recognize the critical nature of Social Security and Medicare, and the need to expand the social safety net, if anything, to ensure basic dignity for the poorest of Americans in one of the world’s richest countries.
And hey, you know Gregg has juice all over Washington. He was President Obama’s initial choice for Commerce Secretary, before withdrawing.
If you want a bunch of quotes from deficit scolds about the need to bravely, boldly cut benefits for poor people, you can read the rest of that article.




23 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Wow. From bad to worse.
Thanks for the post DDay.
x2
Wanna do something bold, Mr. Gregg? Put a 10% tax on all stock holding of $300,000 and up.
Wanna do something really bold? Make it a 20% tax once the stock holdings hit $1 million.
Deficit solved, poor people saved.
I assume old Judd4the1% voted to repeal Glass-Steagall and FOR the even worse Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act. Those votes paved the way for the collapse of 2008.
Would be nice if we could use those votes against Bowles-Gregg.
Hooooray!!!!!!!!!!!!
PW, is that part of Dean Baker’s financial transactions tax? Do you have a link /url handy?
I really like your rendering of it, because it’s so accessible. In economic terms it, isolates the 1%.
What’s good for Milo Minderbinder is good for the country!
Just a humble man doing God’s work.
DD says
“So now, the two men working to influence a deficit reduction plan in Washington work for Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley.”
Anyone thinks Obama and his political team are in touch with present America? No
Most smart Dems need to run from this White House.
Obama is clueless, the PTB is clueless, information like this makes fire come out of progressives and liberals ears, and you probably do not want to be doing this in an election year.
It is almost like Obama and his political team have not heard about facebook, blogs, and twitter, e-mail, etc.
A lot of progressives hate this White House, and they love telling their friends not to vote for OBAMA.
The DNC convention is in the Banking Capital of the South, the home of Bank of America and Wells Fargo
and Obama has two bankers from Goldman Sachs, and Morgan Stanley co-chairing his catfood commission.
Is Romney the only one out of touch? No
Obama is going to wake up in November, wondering how the house and senate went democratic, and WH went to Romney.
and Progressives are going to be laughing all over the place!
Good plan.
Warren Buffett alone would have to pay up $10,911,903,400.00 on his top 15 holdings.
http://warren-buffett-portfolio.com/
I wonder how long he’d stay in the market under those conditions, and how quickly the market would crash if the biggest investors started dumping.
My $30,000 401k would be worthless in a blink. Better hope they don’t touch SS.
Why do Senators care so much about Judd’s opinion?
(Singalong with me to the tune of the Wizard of Oz’s “Follow the yel low brick road…”)
Follow the re vol ving door
Follow the re vol ving door
Follow, follow, follow, follow
Follow the re vol ving door!
Yay for the MOTU!
No surprise that Gregg was Obama’s first choice for Commerce. After all, no one kidnapped Michelle to make him pick Simpson to co-chair the catfood commission.
I know you’re being facetious, and it is funny, but there’s that little reality of the republican control of the House of Reps, and despite the occasional sweethearts-for-Obama polls, that’s not likely to change:
http://news.yahoo.com/poll-obama-loses-advantage-economic-anxieties-increase-063013702.html
Very important comment. It’s not about Gregg or Simpson. It’s about Obama. More and more I believe we’d be better off with Romney on domestic social policy (i.e. SS and the Meds, UCB, etc.)
A Trojan Horse is much, much worse than no horse at all.
Nice.
Imho, it’s not even a Trojan Horse V No Horse situation. It’s a choice between:
- a president who will face a fiscal crisis, as the GOP hold the economy hostage by instrumentalizing the debt-ceiling vote, and will force through bipartisan cuts to entitlements and discretionary spending.
and
- a president who will face no fiscal crisis, but will have an opposition advocating pro-growth policies that he will be incentivized to approve, since it will improve his chances of reelection.
So, irrespective of their character or values:
Obama = Austerity
Romney = Keynesian deficit spending.
They could care less about poor people. Hell, Congress used to at least pretnd they cared. Now? Not so much.
Here we go again. Another “frying pan-fire” moment.
Aside from the “awkward interruption, how did you enjoy the play Mrs. LIncoln?
That’s gonna be a bitch to get on a bumper sticker.
I say we stick with: “We Suck Less”.
I guess you gotta give ‘em credit for dropping the charade.
This is f*cking pathetic! And the voters are supposed to believe that things will get better under this corrupt system?
“We suck less.”
It’s a winner! Just check the mid-term results. :o)
And, thanks, Adams.
The fact that we’re even talking/debating about who would be worse, Obama or Romney, is a horrible indictment of Obama and his 3-and-a-half years as president.
Sorry but I am not ready to die and Ryan only gives me a coupon for $6000 for medical bills. He takes the money from social security FICA for his “general fund” while collecting the premiums with no intention of paying the benefits. Fits well into the GOP Bush/Romney crime sprees. The fat cats have taken the cream for 40 years and now it is austerity for senior citizens. The public expansion will be for body carts. No doubt you think this is better than that Kenyan.
Erskine & Judd are twins!
Both were born into wealthy families, attended private high schools, sat out Vietnam (Erskine in the Coast Guard Resercve, Judd with the typical Republican scion deferment), both capitalized on family connections to advance their careers and both owe their income to investment banking – an industry that would not exist without community support every couple of years.
Why can’t everyone else pull themselves up by their own boot straps like Ersk & Judd?
In the 2002 North Carolina senate race, Erskine was very critical of Liddy for wanting to privatize Social Security.
Did either of these two “successful” bankers see the 2008 crash coming?