This really makes minced meat of our campaign finance laws. Mitt Romney is holding a “Victory Leadership Retreat” this weekend in Utah. It sounds like a fine affair, if your idea of a good time is listening to former secretaries of state James Baker and Condoleezza Rice, Hewlett Packard CEO Meg Whitman, Sen. John McCain, Rep. Paul Ryan, former Gov. Tim Pawlenty, and a parade of mostly older white men opine on national and world affairs. But among the guests is the head of a leading SuperPAC that’s supposedly barred from coordinating with any political campaign:
Then, “Media insight” will feature Romney counsel and longtime GOP attorney Ben Ginsberg; Fred Barnes and Bill Kristol, editors and co-founders of The Weekly Standard; GOP strategist Mary Matalin; and Bush strategist and American Crossroads founder, Karl Rove.
So here’s a big meeting between the campaign and its donors, designed specifically for “strategizing”, and the head of the SuperPACs American Crossroads and Crossroads GPS, dedicated to electing Romney, will be in attendance.
I know that under our broken FEC, there’s really no such thing as illegal coordination, but if we had a functioning body surely this would raise a red flag, no? It’s not much of a stretch:
Mary Boyle, vice president for communications at Common Cause, told ThinkProgress that having one of the leaders of an allied Super PAC at at campaign event with major donors “seems to make a mockery of the rule that bans coordination between a super PAC and a candidate.”
Tara Malloy, senior counsel at the Campaign Legal Center agreed that this presents appearance issues, but would probably not violate any coordination rules. She told ThinkProgress that “the coordination rule is a pretty slim reed between candidates and the SuperPACs that support those candidates. It’s not by any means and airtight barrier between those two.” In order to violate the rules, a candidate would have to have a “substantial discussion” about the Super PAC’s advertising strategies — something Romney and Rove are unlikely to do at this retreat.
Basically, Stephen Colbert’s segments on his SuperPAC have been totally accurate. There’s almost no limit to what a candidate and a SuperPAC organizer can do together that would violate the current set of rules. Which is why the rules are functionally illegitimate.




6 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
The only thing that makes me feel sorry for Rs is that they have to socialize with each other.
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-scam-wall-street-learned-from-the-mafia-20120620?print=true
Hi David have you seen this. read it and fume. Can e get it up here and can we do a lead such as O saying “they have done nothing illegal, maybe unethical, but screwing the taxpayers is part of our job description”
or you could use Dimon’s quote from his blow fest. “we help widows, orphans, the poor and the elderly by stealing money from one pocket and then offering some change back at loan shark rates.
have to say that does seem silly. Why not invite some D’s along after all they all agree, and they could have a great time role playing why cutting off granny’s legs versus her arms makes them so different
The PAC thing is insane, the SCOTUS isn’t following the Rule of Law and neither should we.
Laws don’t matter if they’re not enforced.
Look at Lily Ledbetter.
Let them coordinate.
The sooner Romney destroys the country the sooner we pick up the pieces and move on without them.