Bill McKibben, climate expert and founder of 350.org has a piece reminding us that the extreme and extremely dangerous weather events we’re seeing across the US are occurring in a context of global climate change. With Bill’s permission, we’re reposting his article which appears at Daily Beast. — Ed.
Bill McKibben on the Global Warming Hoax
Please don’t sweat the 2,132 new high temperature marks in June—remember, climate change is a hoax. The first to figure this out was Oklahoma Senator James Inhofe, who in fact called it “the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people,” apparently topping even the staged moon landing. But others have been catching on. Speaker of the House John Boehner pointed out that the idea that carbon dioxide is “harmful to the environment is almost comical.” The always cautious Mitt Romney scoffed at any damage too: “Scientists will figure that out ten, twenty, fifty years from now,” he said during the primaries.
Still, you have to admit: for a hoax, it’s got excellent production values.
Consider the last few weeks. Someone turned on the rain machine up in Duluth, Minnesota, where they broke all their old rainfall records (and in an excellent cinematic touch flooded the city zoo with so much water that the seal escaped and swam down the road. You can make this stuff up). And when that was over, the production team hastened to the Gulf of Mexico, turning on the giant fans to conjure up Tropical Storm Debby—the earliest fourth storm of the season ever recorded, which dumped “unthinkable amounts of rain” on central Florida. (Giveaway movie moment: the nine-foot gator that washed into a Tampa swimming pool).
The special effects guys were doing their best in Colorado: first they cranked up the heat, setting a new state record at 115 degrees. And then came the fire stunts! They looked real enough—one Waldo Canyon resident wrote a harrowing account of driving his SUV across soccer fields to escape the blaze, with “a vision of hell in his rearview mirror.” But there were giveaways it was all faked: for one, the “flames” perfectly framed the famous chapel of the Air Force Academy, and on the very day the new cadets arrived. And really, the producers took it a bit too far: they staged a firestorm near the Boulder campus of the National Center for Atmospheric Research, forcing the evacuation of the planet’s foremost climate scientists. I mean, c’mon.
It’s amazing what you can do with CGI these days. As a “giant heat wave” moved east across the nation, heat records that dated back to the Dust Bowl fell with uncanny speed. Images of the farmer kicking the dust in his drought-ridden field—that old Hollywood staple—reappeared on the evening news; the scene worked so well that the price of corn and wheat shot through the roof. [continued below the fold]
An absurd number of catastrophes kept happening at the same time, just like in the best disaster films. On Friday, for instance, Washington set all-time heat records (one observer described it as like “being in a giant wet mouth, except six degrees warmer”), and then shortly after dinner a storm for the ages blew through—first there was five minutes of high wind, blowing dust and debris (and tumbleweeds? surely some tumbleweeds), followed by an explosive display of thunder and lightning that left millions without power.
Hoaxes require verisimilitude to make sure everyone’s taken in. So it was necessary to make sure that Arctic sea ice is melting ahead of the record pace set in 2007, and wildfires are burning out of control across Siberia, and there is massive flooding n British Columbia, and…We’ll see what bizarreness next week brings.
Because these guys are good. You’d almost swear this is what global warming looks like, since it’s exactly what scientists have been predicting for decades. Indeed, the head of the nation’s climate data center, in Asheville, N.C., used the kind of scary language we’ve come to expect from climate alarmists, calling the record–breaking week “a super-heated spike on top of a decades-long warming trend.”
That’s why it would be so scary if it wasn’t a hoax. But it must be, because if it was a real crisis, responsible authorities would be taking action. The president wouldn’t be approving new oil drilling in the Arctic on the very same week. The Interior Secretary wouldn’t be auctioning off a vast new store of coal. The Republican presidential nominee wouldn’t be promising to approve the Keystone pipeline to the vast tarsands of Canada as his very first order of business.
But if Senator Inhofe is right, we can all relax. It looks real, but it isn’t—it’s just nature trying to compete with James Cameron. So please don’t shout fire in the global 3-D theater. Stay cool. And get a big tub of popcorn—in this epic disaster flick we’re not even close to the finale.
Originally posted at Daily Beast and cross posted with author’s permission.





25 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Considering the “Dog Days of Summer,” have yet to arrive and we are already experiencing these extreme temperature, concern is more than warranted.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dog_Days
Traditionally in New England these days occur in August most often the second third weeks. Usually after labor day it cools off. This past year it did not. But then we got a 22 inches snow storm before Halloween??? “Extremes” Then the warmest winter on record!
I think skepticism is still due, concerning the casuality(anthropocentric proven beyond reasonable doubt?).
when Texas has some of the cooler temps during summer….something is freaking wrong.
We really dont have to go to far back in history to see “climate change”… Many American indian cultures where undone by it. The monguls swept out of asia because of it.
I was also watching a show last night that attributed it to Civilization starting in the first place as humans were driven to the Nile delta in large groups because Northern Africa changed into a desert
“Ask any six-year-old in a Chinese street, “What’s a solar water heater and what’s it for?” Without hesitation they will tell you: “A solar water heater is on the roof of a building to make hot water for the shower.””
“the next generation of solar water heaters are found on large apartment buildings, which represent a rapidly growing market segment. The new clients are housing companies that design roofs to host enough thermosiphon systems for each flat to be sold with solar hot water.
These housing companies must meet solar obligations imposed by several cities and municipalities since the Renewable Energy Law of 2006. Most local governments now require solar water heaters to be installed in new civil buildings of up to 12 storeys.”
“Utopia Garden Project is one of the Solar Valley’s most recent multi-family buildings, where flats of 300-600 m2 nestle amid verdant gardens and combine energy-efficiency standards with renewable energy supplies”
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/issue/
So, you do not dispute the fact that changes are occurring, simply the cause?
Considering the implications, I cannot see how comfort may be taken in either … or ANY position, no matter how semantically “cool”, especially in the “long run” …
Thank you, Scarecrow, and Bill McKibben, as well.
DW
I figure…even if it IS a hoax, wouldn’t it be prudent to err on the side of caution?
We’ve certainly, in saner times realized that we needed to stop producing certain refrigerants and propellents as they tuned the ozone layer into Swiss cheese. Methane does it too.
We keep cutting down those unsightly trees that produce oxygen for us and pump moisture back into the atmosphere.
We’ve changed a lot of things since His-Story began, why not our energy production into something that makes sense? And let’s really not go Noocluar as nookes take a whole mess of water a fossil fuels to run. not to mention trading radiation for carbon
I like the concept of fossil fuels as burning ancient sunlight. That’s a perspective I can wrap my mind around.
Change civilization or lose it. Laziness and resistance to change will not be allowed. We should have listened to Jimmy Carter way back when, we might have avoided the worst.
As it is now, we’re probably in for hundreds of years of this even if we changed our ways tomorrow.
We’ve set a cycle in motion
PS: Romney sure has a lot of things he wants to do on the “first day”
Just plain clueless. To think human activity doesn’t play a part in the acceleration of global climate change is willfully ignorant.
I used to think it was due to the cow farts. But not any longer. Not after last summer here in Houston. 21 days over 100 and no rain from February until September.
Who’d a thunk Al Gore was that smart?
Sure, it’s only 98% of climate scientists that are convinced that global warming is driven by human activity.
It’s no problem at all to wait for the remaining, industry-bribed 2% to get tired of cashing oil company checks. After all, we’ve got that spare planet earth we can use if we wait too long
(It’s anthropogenic, by the way, not anthropocentric. Don’t be embarassed – it’s cute when global warming trolls show off their expertise by not even knowing what words to use.)
“Scientists and Economists’ Call to Action
DOWNLOAD: Scientists and Economists Full Statement June 2010 Update
The U.S. Scientists and Economists’ Call for Swift and Deep Cuts in Greenhouse Gas Emissions is a call to our nation’s leaders to require immediate, deep reductions in heat-trapping emissions that cause global warming. The statement is endorsed by more than 2,000 scientists and economists with expertise relevant to our understanding of the scientific and economic dimensions of climate change, its impacts, and solutions. This marks the first time leading U.S. scientists and economists have joined together to make such an appeal.”
http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming/solutions/big_picture_solutions/scientists-and-economists.html
The science is overwhelming.
I am surprised at the number of comments at this site by people who don’t understand that.
yeah, and a lot of your Texas cattle died last year because it was too hot, and dry. so it can’t be that.
cost your cattle ranchers 7 billion dollars.
Did you mean causality and anthropogenic? If the terminology is beyond you, I guess that it should probably come as no surprise that the science is as well.
Come on, people. Scarecrow just showed beyond a shadow of a doubt that any climate change problems are staged by man. Anyway, Al Gore is still fat, so there. Why in just 2212 we will all look back on this period of climate problems and laugh at how worked up we were. Our ‘leaders’ are so right to allow themselves to be bought by the big energy companies and protect those interests over those of the rest of society. What excellent ‘leadership’ they show; it’s breathtaking.
Ha Ha, Newtie was gonna do it all in the first hour.
Wait a minute, you say it was not cow farts but Al Gore’s smarts are the cause of it?
I don’t believe it … for a even a minute, ncg.
I just timed myself, to see … the second-hand on my decoder watch did not even move a whole second when I said, “Balderdash!!!”
;~DW
I generally shy away from looking at single episodes and shouting “climate change”; you can attribute the shock of what we are seeing in part to the fact that we are looking at it more closely than in the past, perhaps.
That said, I don’t doubt that the steadily rising temperatures are going to make for some marvelous shows in the future.
I don’t think that there is a need for shying away from attributing single episodes to global warming anymore, though. The totality of the mess we have been seeing this Spring in particular would mitigate against that, IMHO. Other events not mentioned in this article were cattle dying in Texas from drought stricken forage off-gassing cyanide and huge floods in England. Last month it was sailors reporting square miles of methane bubbling to the surface in the Arctic ocean north of Siberia and Michigan reporting that it has lost ninety percent of its’ apple crop. This is what all of the scientists have been predicting for years, and it would appear that it has arrived on schedule.
Scientists – you know, the ones who actually know what they are talking about – don’t just selectively “look closely” – the make and record measurements.
And when they look beyond “single episodes” there is an unmistakeable trend.
In this video, climate scientist Kevin Tremberth explains that in the 1950′s, 60′s & 70′s record hot temperatures matched record cold temperatures 1 to 1. Now there are 10 times more high temperature records broken than cold temperature records.
He states it most clearly when he says “There is no parallel to this”
The typical denier dodges no longer hold up – the trends have become too pronounced to ignore.
Thank you Scarecrow, and Mr. McKibben also. We all remember how you put your bodies on the line, Jane also, to draw attention to that oil pipeline ongoing – would that it were fake also.
all of which, as can be seen from some of the replies to the post, doesn’t stop people from repeating the denier dodges, as if they made sense.
The core of the “denier” point of view, is the same one as is used in the evolution v. design “debate” .
that’s how stupid it is.
For some people, it seems, it doesn’t matter if the answer is being rubbed in their face, they still don’t get it.
Great McKibben, great Scarecrow, highly rcc’d . . .
I think not.
Who pays you for this tripe?
Anthropogenic, not anthropcentric.. but anyway..
No, the science is actually quite well understood. We know, very well [have for at least a century] the physics of CO2 and energy. We know very well what the atmosphere composition looks like now and in the past. We know very well where this carbon is coming from [hint.. it just happens to have a shockingly similar radioisotope ratio compared to the carbon in coal and oil].
Heck, even the CEO of BP doesn’t seem to have any doubt. Just last week he fully acknowledged that Anthropogenic Global Warming is real but he blew it off, claiming it’s “an engineering problem” and said we shouldn’t worry [or stop burning BP gas] because “humans will adapt”.
I’m guessing CEOs will adapt much better than the poor.
I think some of the 2% are changing sides as we speak. Last week the CEO of BP admitted AGW is real, but said we’d adapt to it so no-harm no-foul I guess. I’m guessing he’s having some of his costal mansions picked up and moved 100 yards up his property as we speak.
Drill baby drill.
There’s no controversy here. All of the other known possible mechanisms have been ruled out as insufficient to explain the rapid onset of this warming, and the fast-rising CO2 levels do explain it, almost perfectly, except for the fact that it’s only really sinking in lately that feedback mechanisms (e.g., sea-ice loss and subsequent heat absorption) are a lot stronger than scientists used to think they would be.