I’ve noticed that many of you have become rather careless with the English language, and frankly, it’s just confusing the children. Recognizing the threat to the next generation’s ability to understand the news on Fox, America’s Family Man, Mitt Romney, bravely came forward today to clarify when a tax that isn’t a tax is really a tax. From the New York Times:
Mitt Romney said on Wednesday that the individual mandate in President Obama’s health care law was “a tax,” just days after his campaign said the candidate had rejected that characterization.
In an interview with Jan Crawford of CBS News, Mr. Romney said: “While I agreed with the dissent, that’s taken over by the fact that the majority of the court said it’s a tax, and therefore it is a tax. They have spoken.”
“They concluded it was a tax. That’s what it is, and the American people know that President Obama has broken the pledge he made,” he added. “He said he wouldn’t raise taxes on middle-income Americans. Not only did he raise the $500 billion that was already in the bill, it’s now clear that his mandate as described by the Supreme Court is a tax.”
On Monday, Mr. Romney’s presidential campaign said that the health care mandate should be thought of as a penalty and not as a tax.
Thank god, that’s all cleared up. So please pay attention, because from now on, you should all use the following standardized conventions or risk having to make yourself as foolish as the people we now have running for President.
1. If you’re subject to RomneyCare, and you fail to have health insurance and aren’t exempt, the fee you must pay to the Massachusetts Department of Revenue when you file your income taxes is a “penalty” designed to encourage individual responsibility and to discourage free riders.
2. If you’re talking about ObamaCare, and you fail to have health insurance and aren’t exempt, the fee you must pay to the IRS when you file your income taxes is “the largest tax increase in history,” except for all the ones that are larger.
3. If you’re Chief Justice John Roberts, and you’re writing the first version of your opinion to take down the entire Affordable Care Act, you must insist that the ACA fee for not purchasing health insurance is not a tax; it’s a penalty, but that won’t save it.
4. If you’re Chief Justice John Roberts and you’re writing the second version of your opinion, which you’re writing because you think your friends Scalia et ilk are crazy, to preserve the mandate in the Affordable Care Act, you must insist that if Congress didn’t call the fee a tax it must be a tax.
5. If you’re the governor of Wisconsin or like-minded state, and you reduce the level of state contributions for health care and pensions and instead force selective government employees to pay more out of pocket for the same levels they had before, you may not refer to that as a “tax” on government workers, nor admit this is balancing the budget on the backs of a select group, because Republican Governors don’t raise taxes; it’s just a fair punishment for people who work for the government.
6. If you are the Administrator of a public university, and you substantially raise tuition fees on new students, you may not refer to that as a selective tax only on parents/students seeking a public education; it’s just applying sound business practices to what used to be thought of as a public obligation.
7. If you decide to extend the solvency of the Social Security Trust Fund another few decades by lifting the income cap on FICA withholding, you are required to call that an unfair tax on the job creators. If you try to solve the same problem by reducing benefits, such as by using a lower inflation index, you may not refer to that as an effective tax on beneficiaries; it’s just making sure old people don’t steal from their grand children’s future.
8. If someone proposes to treat carried interest profits as ordinary income, like those Mr. Romney uses to hold the summer Olympics in Connecticut while finishing up the improvements on his new digs in La Jolla, you should harshly criticize such proposals as a tax to kill a very good job creator, even if the jobs are outsourced.
I’m sure there are many other examples, and WE will be listening and watching to correct you whenever you get it wrong. So pay attention.
P.S. Just between us, it’s okay to call the fee a “penalty tax” or a penalty collected as a tax or whatever, to encourage purchase of insurance and to contribute to the costs of health care for the larger risk pool. Shhh.




17 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Speaking of carelessness with the English language, can we please distinguish between the cost of the mandate and the cost of not obeying the mandate?
–Mitt Romney said on Wednesday that the individual mandate in President Obama’s health care law was “a tax,” (I think he means for not obeying the mandate)
–If you’re talking about ObamaCare, and you fail to have health insurance and aren’t exempt, the fee you must pay to the IRS when you file your income taxes is “the largest tax increase in history,” except for all the ones that are larger. etc. (clearly for not obeying the mandate)
1. The cost of obeying the mandate — what’s that? Is it a premium, a fee, a tax, a penalty, or what? In the law it’s called a premium payable to the IRS (apparently — it’s not clear to me in the law).
2. The cost of NOT obeying the mandate — is it a penalty, a fee, a tax, or what? In the law it’s clearly and repeatedly called a penalty, paid to the IRS. “RETURN.—Any penalty imposed by this section with respect to any month shall be included with a taxpayer’s return under chapter 1 for the taxable year which includes such month.” –p. 145
Those should be the questions and some of the alternative answers.
Further: Good luck on reading the law, but I read it to say that the Secretary of the Treasury will supervise this monstrosity with all “fees” whether for compliance or for noncompliance to be treated as “internal revenue” which shouts “taxes” to me. Again, that’s for both compliance and for noncompliance.
Or am I missing something?
The USA is the world leader in baffling their citizens with bullshit. It’s another benefit of an advertising industry that has spent years refining the skill of obfuscation through redefining language to prey on the consumer culture of USA,Inc. It’s the Art of Lying, and a very effective control mechanism.
Scarecrow,
Thanks for a wise & witty post, but I think “FISA” should be “FICA”
The cat is out of the bag, since we’ve been sold a pig in a poke ~ so strap them both to the roof of the station wagon and keep on walking . . . just keep on walking.
~Peggington Noonington~
And you’re quite right, hbb. This morning the elderly lady sitting next to me at the counter, where I was having breakfast and reading the LAT, asked me kindly which store was having the 70% Off Sale. I lifted the bottom of the page from under my plate where we saw the Saks Fifth Avenue logo, and gave each other knowing looks. I said, “even 70% off isn’t going to be much of a ‘sale’ there.”
We need to nip this. One Justice said it was a tax; eight Justices said it was not a tax. From SCOTUSblog: “Justice Ginsburg (joined by Justices Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan) agreed with the Chief Justice’s bottom line – that the mandate is constitutional under Congress’s ability to tax – even while disagreeing with his Commerce Clause conclusion; those four Justices would have also held that Congress could use its power to regulate commerce to pass the mandate.”
I found reading this post very taxing. Please don’t penalize us like this again, SC.
See, and I thought math was hard. It turns out that linguistics is even harder.
One Justice said it was a tax; eight Justices said it was not a tax…
Phoenix Woman had mentioned early on that Robert’s opinion was deemed a ‘dicta’ and that Ginsburg’s majority opinion is the persuasive ruling…!
It’s all about parsing for advantage, nothing more.
“Tax” versus “penalty” is so malleable you can do anything with it on a moment’s notice, and change your mind as the situation beckons. Isn’t it wonderful?
Yes, just like when Bubba said, “Monica, it’s not sex, it’s a dicta.”
SHH
it’s NOT okay forcing anyone into buying from private industry without giving them a public alaternative, that’s the original definition of fascism
shhh
You inadvertently left the “it” off the end of your “SHH”, which is an apt description of this legislation..
Oh dear. I hope the NSA was not watching.
It’s a Tax. Slap
It’s a Penalty. Slap
It’s a Tax AND A Penalty!!!
Rmoney got the memo from Chief Justice Roberts: It is a tax because the Court is going to overturn every social safety law since 1933 being based on the Commerce Clause.
Roberts and Alito both brazenly lied to Congress and the American People when they said they would not overturn ‘Settled Law’ (Stare Decisis) They immediately threw out 100 years of campaign finance law making it legal for the Robber Barons to openly buy politicians. The Court has sent the word to bring laws that the GOP wants overturned before the Supreme Court and they will eagerly do so.
Roberts, Alito and Scalia have publicly said that the Middle Class is unconstitutional. They will eliminate Social Security, Medicaid, getting paid for your work, being able to drink clean water, everything.
Roberts and Alito are ready for impeachment now.
It is a ‘fiscal imposition’ for not doing something. There are fiscal impositions for lots of things, not filing your returns on time, driving without insurance, speeding. Only a nation swirling down the drain would give such angelic pinhead arguments a second glance. Nothing serious here. move on. Meanwhile people are dying. Romney rmoney is going to disappear the way the tiger in Sambo disappeared, chasing his own lying [or is it liaring?] tail or is it tale. Truth has never, and will never, touch those lips.
It’s the same with electrons. Are they particles; are they waves? No one can say.
http://youtu.be/e0q1PH_6Yys