Since the beginning of the Iranian oil embargo imposed by the EU July 1, the press reports have sought to increase tensions between Iran and the West rather than reduce them. Witness today’s story about Iran disguising its oil tankers to get around the embargo, proving their duplicity and desperation. Or witness the highlighting of one quote from the head of Iran’s hardline Revolutionary Guards claiming that they could reach US bases, warships, and Israeli land with their missiles in the event of an attack on their nuclear facilities.
But under the radar – I haven’t seen it in any US press other than McClatchy – the negotiations over the nuclear program are in the midst of a resumption.
After more than 15 hours of expert-level talks, the United States and other major world powers agreed with Iran early Wednesday to move toward resumption of full negotiations to ensure that Iran’s nuclear fuel enrichment does not turn into a nuclear weapons program, a European participant at the talks said.
The meeting, in Istanbul’s upscale Conrad hotel, began Tuesday amid doubts that talks would resume after they stalled last month.
But as of early Wednesday, the participants reached agreement to implement the “Moscow plan,” a process that would start with a mid-level meeting between senior European Union official, Helga Schmidt, and her Iranian counterpart, Ali Bagheri.
The outcome of those talks would determine whether full-scale negotiations will follow, a European diplomat attending the talks told McClatchy. The diplomat spoke anonymously because the discussions are ongoing.
Since talks broke up with Moscow in June, there was genuine concern over whether the P5+1 (permanent five members of the UN Security Council, plus Germay) negotiations would continue at all. But the meeting between technical experts apparently went well.
The framework of the negotiations remain the same. The P5+1 want Iran to stop their uranium enrichment above 20% level, ship out future fuel for reprocessing abroad and stop activities at Fordow, the one facility assumed to have the protections to resist any attacks. Iran wants the economic sanctions, including the EU oil embargo, lifted, and international recognition of their right to enrich uranium for the purposes of civilian nuclear energy. This broke down in Moscow after Iran brought in some ancillary issues, but the technical talks created a common space for future negotiations.
But you wouldn’t hear this, for the most part, in the press.




5 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
” … the press reports have sought to increase tensions …”
While most Youessians, do not bother to dig deeper, in search of the truth, which even the “government” has, apparently NO interest in “advertising” nor saying ANYTHING about the behavior of the media in trying to “ramp up” or “sex-up” the “fever” for war.
What is wrong with this “picture”?
And why?
DW
Iran is not enriching ABOVE 20%, which is not prohibited anyhow by treaty. A reminder that while Iran is enriching U235 up to 20%, the Brazil-Turkey deal in 2010 would have provided an alternative. But the U.S. increased sanctions via the UN and killed the deal.
Iran will not agree to stop enrichment because (of course) it can’t depend upon other countries to provide nuclear fuel for its nuclear reactors. Why does Iran need nuclear energy? Because it can make more money selling petroleum than using it. Saudi Arabia and UAE have embarked on nuclear energy programs for similar reasons. The Iran program was started by the US back in the days of the Shah. It was a great idea back then.
So there is nothing to negotiate, but both sides want to continue the talks because it beats actually doing anything.
While they do have the right to have nuclear power,
Iran could be spared a lot of grief if it went with wind, and solar. Hard to see how it could be threatened as it is, if that was the route that was taken.
And chances are the only people that will suffer under the sanctions, are the citizens.
solar, for which they have much potential, is probably cheaper than nuclear, and can probably be up and running much more quickly.
they could easily get help from world leader China.
so. to me what they’re doing makes no sense.
It’s dead wrong to blame Iran for this concocted crisis. Whether it makes sense to you or not, Iran is in complete compliance with its treaty obligations and it makes sense for Iran to refuse to knuckle under to US illegal demands.
Iran was sanctioned prior to the nuclear issue and it would not be “spared a lot of grief” if it dropped nuclear. The reason Iran is a contrived US enemy is fifty years old: Iran resists US/Israel hegemony in the Middle East. The US dislike of the Brazil-Turkey deal, after first encouraging it and then buckling to Israel pressure, is but one example of this syndrome.
As it happens, Iran has (unwillingly) become the ‘poster boy’ for other non-aligned countries in defying US world hegemony, and its imposed financial problems are the vanguard for weaning the world, especially in high-growth Asia, off of US financial and banking controls. China, India and Russia support Iran, as do many other countries, in great part because they resent US world hegemony while some of them just need Iran’s energy supplies, gas and oil.
In Southwest Asia particularly, Iran’s neighborhood, there will be a new reality as the US pulls its failed military forces from the region. Russia is making political moves into Pakistan, and India is not only close to Iran (for oil and transport routes into Central Asia) it is also moving closer to Pakistan and increasing its interest in Afghanistan. Both Russia and China have offered to finance the new Iran-Pakistan gas pipeline which would bring gas from Iran’s extensive holdings to Pakistan which badly needs more energy. Iran is already exporting gas to other countries including Turkey, and is exporting a lot of petroleum to Afghanistan (yes), and electricity is exported also. Iran is diversifying its exports and is less dependent on petroleum, as it has been forced to be but actually in the long run it’s better for Iran.
I do not blame Iran, and I agree it’s a concocted crisis. and probably something else would be found to replace it.
I agree with all that you have posted.
But,
International conflicts power struggles, hegemony, and confrontations aside, power shouldn’t be generated using nuclear reactors. Why do it that way, if the only purpose is to stand up to the USA?