
New Face Book CEO announces revised privacy policy (photo: talkradionews)
Mark Zuckerberg, the kid who made himself a billionaire by combining the internet with the well known human traits of loneliness, voyeurism and exhibitionism has now wisely used his fabulous wealth to cut down on his mortgage payments. He’s managed to cut the interest rate on his multimillion dollar home mortgage to just a few ticks above 1 percent. From Bloomberg’s:
The Facebook Inc. (FB) founder refinanced a $5.95 million mortgage on his Palo Alto, California, home with a 30-year adjustable-rate loan starting at 1.05 percent, according to public records for the property.
This makes a great deal of sense, and as the Administration’s various refinancing schemes suggest, it’s the patriotic thing to do. Anything we can do to help the private sector deleverage by cutting its frightful debt burdens will help the economy. And the idea has broader implications for the economy:
While almost all lending rates have reached historical lows this year, the borrowing costs available to high-net-worth individuals are even lower if the person is willing to bear the risk of monthly interest rate adjustments, said Greg McBride, senior financial analyst with Bankrate Inc., a North Palm Beach, Florida-based firm that tracks interest rates. Large increases are unlikely anytime soon with the Federal Reserve signaling it will keep interest rates near zero for at least two years.
Okay, the ingredients seem to require that we have historically low borrowing/lending rates, we have an extremely credit-worthy borrower with a near infinite ability to focus wealth, we have an entity fully capable of bearing the risks — there’s little/no chance of default — and an economic situation that suggests these conditions are likely to extend well into the future.
Let’s see, who else faces these conditions? . . . OMG! Ben!
So I hereby propose a trade. We’ll give the private sector Ben Bernanke, and in exchange we get Mark Zuckerberg. As the new head of the Federal Reserve, Chairman Mark’s mission will be to refinance the US debt and open its meeting notes to everyone. Then he can change all the bankster’s e-mail addresses.
I think he can do it, because borrowing costs have never been so low, there’s a virtually unlimited ability to sustain the credit of the US — we can never default, you know — and the Fed can always create money if needed. This would be an ideal time to reduce the debt load and boost spending power to complement private deleveraging, by buying US Tresuries, and that will help the economy. We’ll call it Zuckerberg Relaxing, or ZR.
And don’t smirk at the thought of Ben Bernanke running Face Book. In fact, if may help to have the reclusive Ben, who hated anyone looking at his stuff, in charge of setting privacy and information sharing policies for the world’s most personal and embarrassing data base. And even if Ben screws up the company and needs a loan, there’s always Bain Capital.




18 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
:)
And he can do it all wearing a hoodie!
Will Goldman handle the Fed’s IPO?
1. Who shorted facebook on its IPO?
2. Zuckerberg, iirc (didn’t save link) is one of the new mukety mucks in Bilderberger (David Rock is getting really really old).
Scarecrow for SecTreas. Or Head of FedRes. Or both.
Do the people who applaud the current, and obscenely low, interest rates understand the affect this is having on pension funds as well as the social security and medicare trust funds ? These funds, as they should, put most of their money in income producing, interest paying securities (i.e. bonds and treasuries). As an example, CALPERS requires an annual return of 7.5% on these investments to meet future payout obligations. Thanks to Bernanke’s ZIRP policy CALPERS made 1% during the last fiscal year ended 06/30/12. Oh well, what do I know. I guess it’s more important to provide cheap financing for mindless consumption to temporarily inflate the economic statistics. We can let our kids and grandkids deal with the consequences when the Ponzi collapses.
Yes, they know, but they don’t give a shit bc it doesn’t affect the 1%, who have all of their money (much of it ripped off of US taxpayers) in off-shore accounts.
Beat me to it.
Zuckerberg’s also CIA.
I understand why the 1% support this. I was addressing the progressives who support these policies. Many seem to be oblivious to the negative affects, not just what I described above but other things, such as the malinvestmment that occurred during the housing bubble.
I’d like to be a fly on the wall at their next meeting in The Hague.
You don’t think they’re gonna let Mark in dressed like he does, do you?
So-called “progressives” who are “ok” with this stuff are either: a) benefiting from it in some way (ie, a low mortgage rate for themselves), or b) not paying attention. A lot of citizens fall into the latter category.
And/or progressives who work in the private sector are increasingly propogandized to believe that public sector workers don’t “deserve” the pensions that many have contributed to out of their salaries, so: who cares if those pensions go bust???
Really the propoganda wurlitzer has done a thorough job of getting most citizens – no matter how they vote – to ignore reality.
Why not? Who cares if Zuckerberg’s wearing his stupid hoodie?? He’s in the CIA and he made a boatload of cash… plus he spies on people. He’s PERFECT. His “uniform” don’t matter.
The off-shore accounts might do a bit better by evading US taxation, but they still have to find somewhere to invest the money. It sure isn’t in productive assets.
Why would a person worth a billion dollars have a mortgage on a 6 million dollar home??
Ben Bernanke should be in prison.
I simply can’t get past the image of giving Zuckerberg access to the presses that print our money! I picture him going so bonkers at the thought of printing money that he does little else and dies from lack of food, drink, etc.
I remember reading about the loan vs pay cash lifetime benefit program for these IPO billionaires. Zuckerberg, as some IPO billionaires before him, only had to sell/ convert to cash, a small fraction of his new fortune at IPO time.Say 100 million of the billion dollars. That money will have some 2012 tax consequences.
He can keep the bulk of his billion in stock unconverted and untaxed. Even for the rest of his life, Zuckerberg can just take minimal interest loans out against the collateral/ bulk of the stock; it grows (presumably) in value, he never pays taxes, (maybe too someday no capital gains taxes?) and it can even get “passed through” to heirs, (maybe too someday no inheritance tax?)
I’m no tax expert, but I remember reading of the likely strategy; it seems to be supported by Zuckerberg’s seemingly unnecessary mortgage
I don’t see much benefit of trading a know Ponzi schemer for a suspected Ponzi schemer, but ah well. I guess society is due for a collapse anyway so it doesn’t really matter.