As expected, Republicans filibustered the DISCLOSE Act last night, as the legislation that would have forced disclosure on political campaign expenditures failed 51-44. Republicans who voted all united against the bill, and they were joined by West Virginia’s Joe Manchin, who is sure to have a wide variety of independent expenditure ads funded by secret donors against him in his re-election campaign. Harry Reid voted against the bill as a procedural matter, to ensure that he could call it up again for reconsideration.
(UPDATE: An earlier version of this story said that Joe Manchin voted against the DISCLOSE Act yesterday. He did not. I lazily built on previous reports. I regret the error.)
And in fact, Democrats did hold a midnight vigil for for the bill in an attempt to raise awareness of the issue and who was blocking progress on it. A band of Democrats, including Jeanne Shaheen, Al Franken, Robert Menendez, Sherrod Brown and Sheldon Whitehouse, spoke on the DISCLOSE Act until 1am last night.
“For the last two years, our Democracy has been hijacked by powerful special interests, and tonight we had the opportunity to begin repairing the fabric of our nation’s democracy before permanent damage is done,” Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) said as the debate began. “Unfortunately, Republicans decided not to put our democracy back on the right track.”
Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) and several others proceeded to the floor to cite examples of how groups are trying to influence elections, without giving voters any way to find out who is behind the message.
“I rise⦠because the corporations involved and the investors are flooding our elections with campaign money,” Brown said. “We don’t really know who the money’s from. We can guess. In my state, we think it’s from oil companies, we think it’s Wall Street banks, we think it could be money from Chinese interests.”
Senators like Menendez and Brown have been using opposition to unscrupulous, secretly-funded attack ads as part of their re-election campaigns, so the all-nighter served a dual purpose.
Minority Leader Mitch McConnell repeatedly called the action a waste of time during a fragile economic recovery, something he managed not to say when the House of Representatives passed a repeal of the Affordable Care Act for the 33rd time last week.
President Obama’s statement decried the flow of millions of dollars in dark money into elections, saying “If we allow this practice to continue, special interests will have unprecedented influence over politicians.” I didn’t know that special interests had minimal influence over politicians before 2010, but there you have it. Obama said that Republicans “stood with big banks and oil companies” by blocking the vote.
The plan is for Reid to call for an additional vote on the DISCLOSE Act today.




9 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
.. and if he was actually serious and not grandstanding Reid would continue to pound on this for the next few months. Unfortunately, both sides are equally bought and the Democrats are merely trying to solidify this new populist message they are trying to use this election cycle to score quick easy political points.
The Democrats for the most part as equally corrupt as the Republicans, it is just this go around the Democrats have decided to take the moral high ground and act as if they were liberals. Don’t worry, this is all a flash in the pan and next week the whole DISCLOSE Act will be a distant memory and no one will bring it up.
This is all for sound bites, nothing more.
The Democrats had 2 years (1st 2 years of Obama’s term) straight out to try to win the people over and they squandered it playing ball with big business and the Republicans. Since then, instead of continually hammering the corruption of the Republicans home on a daily basis for the past 2 years, they waffled around some more and don’t deserve any special attention.
Yeah Reid and assorted Democratic Senators who aren’t fearing for their elections this go around. You go. Show up how valiant you are… *sigh*
The SCOTUS decided $$ was free speech.
To me, it’s chicken shit to hide and yell from your hiding place.
Government and politicians “for sale” and we don;t even know who’s doing the buying.
That’s THE formula for disaster, revolution, and/or fall of the American empire.
Thank heavens we have Harry Reid in there fighting for us.
You’re being totally unfair to the Democrats – the most important thing for our coutnry was pleasing health industry corporate lobbyists. It’s not like the high unemployment rate matters since that’s just ordinary people who are out of work, rather than anyone who matters.
Lol, and I am sure there is no reason why he chose to bring up the DISCLOSE Act _now_ as opposed anytime since the SCOTUS announced their idiotic ruling. No, political gamesmanship? Never!
waynec —
Exactly right. What a crock of shit to say that “money is free speech” and then insist that this so-called “speech” also has the right to be hidden and anonymous.
Harry “Palooka” Reid. Did he ever recover from those head shots he took in the ring or is he still a walking concussion?
Stop! I can’t catch my breath from laughing so hard.
I am from the Sonoran Desert, and virtually all “progressives” can be segmented as “racial and ethnics” and consequently, all most all “white” Democrats are “conservative” Democrats since virtually all these “white” Democrats supported SB 1070 and HB 2281.
Thus, we, the “racial and ethnics” recognize that “bitching” in politics falls into two distince categories, the Professional “bitching” and the Amateur “bitching” and the obvious underlying premise is that the Amateurs can’t bring themselves forward for challenging their Democratic-affiliated Senators for establishing a Progressive Caucus in the Senate.
And since I am from ARizona, and the two Senators are Republicans, my fellow Progressives, have intellectually imploded due to this Amateur-standing, and therefore, I have to rely on the Professionals, if in fact, they have called the offices of their Democratic-affiliated Senators and advocated that their respective Senators “establish” a Progressive Caucus in the Senate.
In closing, when I come to this political blog, my ‘reading/listening’ to what is being said and written, my yardstick jumps up and measures the ‘bitching’ as being appropriately categorized. As such, if you haven’t advocated for the establishment of a Progessives Caucus, in any manner, shape or form, the “viability” for what is being said or listened to, remains at in the numerical arena for a Fat Zero, nonetheless, since there is nothing “there.”
Jaango