A suicide bomb killed the Syrian defense minister and President Bashar al-Assad’s brother-in-law today, among other top officials, in the most direct and effective attack on the Syrian regime since the beginning of the uprising and civil war.
Reports said the officials had been killed by a bodyguard in a suicide bombing in the capital of Syria but other reports said a device was placed within the building. A “terrorist bomb” which exploded at a national security building in Damascus during a meeting of ministers and security officials wounded several people, some of them critically, state television said.
The state-run news agency SANA reported that Wednesday’s blast took place at the National Security building, a headquarters for one of Syria’s intelligence branches. Activists in Damascus said by telephone that Republican Guards sealed off the Shami hospital in the capital after ambulances had brought casualties from the site of the explosion.
“The terrorist suicide bombing” came in the high security Rawda district in the heart of the capital as battles raged in Damascus for the fourth consecutive day.
The Syrian regime often calls any attack on them the work of terrorists, whether true or not. In this case, the Free Syrian Army and the rebel group Liwa al-Islam took responsibility for the attack, so it certainly seems like a part of the ongoing civil war.
This reminds me of the bomb attack inside the Presidential palace in Yemen, which wounded and disfigured President Ali Abdullah Saleh, leading him to head to Saudi Arabia (and eventually the US) for treatment. This also led to Yemen accepting a transition agreement that now has the Vice President Abd-Rabbu Mansour Hadi in power.
I don’t know if the same dynamic will play out in Syria; Assad himself was not hit in the attack. But this is a serious blow to the power dynamic we’ve seen, where the regime goes out and brutally represses civilians. The rebels have fought back in increasingly deadly ways. Today, for example, fighting continues in the capital, Damascus, a fourth day of carnage.
This does not yet signal a turning point. The citizens in the capital have not necessarily turned against the regime. But today’s attack adds an entirely new dimension to the civil war, with the international community hopelessly watching on the sidelines.




37 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
You actually think the “citizens of the capital” have anything to do with this? How bizarre. And that the “international community hopelessly watching on this sidelines.”
Wow. This has all the hallmarks of international job.
Looks like another step in the US plan for regime change that Wesley Clark referenced is well on its way to being accomplished by the Syrian proxies of NATO, Israel, and Saudi Arabia. What number of the 7 targeted is Syria?
You mean…..theoretically…..somebody with a “license to kill”?
(Cue Bond theme)
Esactly eCahn!!
This article represents the journalistic nadir for the Lake, so far.
Jane,
Methinks the credibility of this site has been seriously compromised, now that it has been infiltrated by neocons (???)
I’m not saying who it was or wasn’t. But, let’;s not forget what happened to Qadaffi when the locals found him. Maybe somebody who found their family murdereede b y Asaad, decided to takle a more pro-active stance in the revolution. KInda like our own Frances Marion, the “Swamp Fox”.
coulda happened.
OTOH, lotsa people have a brother-in-law they mnight want to get rid of.
Just sayin’
I’m sorry for that. That’s out of line. :-)
It’s already been objectively reported that aid and arms from the players I mentioned has been funneled to the “resistance” in Syria through Turkey. This is an indirect attack on Iran and Russia to curb their influence in the ME, much as our covert campaign in Africa, the purpose of which is to counter China’s influence.
Even more egregious than the snippet you highlighted, eCAHN, is this most sickening tripe I have ever seen in an article on this site:
“The Syrian regime often calls any attack on them the work of terrorists, whether true or not. In this case, the Free Syrian Army and the rebel group Liwa al-Islam took responsibility for the attack, so it certainly seems like a part of the ongoing civil war.”
True or not; which is it?
Who is this Free Syrian Army?
Rebel? I guess they can’t be terrorists then!
Civil war or external plan to resahpe a sovereign country?
Always appreciate your “heads up”.
Not necessarily mutually exclusive options. French helped us, remember.
Besides this isn’t a revolution. It’s regime change targeted by the West to remove Iran’s ally. The “kinetic military action” in Libya was to punish Omar for the benefit of Big Oil and because he upset the Banksters by proposing a change from accepting the Dollar/Euro as payment for oil.
I hail your non-commitance in avoiding the clear strategy observed, where an external plan to reshape a sovereign country by fomenting civil war is currently in effect in Syria (lol).
You see the “good guys” can’t be engaged in terrorism since they’re the “good guys,” but if you’re on the wrong team and do the same thing, you’ve engaged in terrorism. “Good guys” are good 24/7 and “bad guys” are bad 24/7, which is why the world is a battlefield. It’s sort of like killing first responders – that’s not terrorism or a war crime because we did it.
Why thank you. I’ve never been “hailed” here before.
In all honesty I think Syria is just a “two birds with one stone” kinda thing.
My position would have been more dramatic IF I coulda gotten the BOnd theme played in the background. I don;t know how to load a wave file.
(Cue Pat Benatar)
Or is this a trend where quantity (diarrhea) of articles posted outstrips quality (accuracy/truth) of articles?
Care to clarify this “two birds with one stone” thingy?
It’s clear to me that civil war is the method of choice for achieving the ends sought by external agents.
“… with the international community hopelessly watching on the sidelines.”
But there have been more than enough reports to demonstrate the international community is actively intervening in this conflict, primarily with arms support, logistics, offering safe havens (as in NATO partner Turkey).
Why would one use the formulation in this article?
You mean like,
“…You’re either with us, or against us…”
Where have I heard this before?
Does make one wonder…
O my O my. It’s a tough job herding lefty sheep. You can mollycoddle ‘em for years and they still complain when they smell the wolf. O my goodness.
Just prematurely speculating about the comment thread to DDay’s upcoming post on the bus bombing in Bulgaria… how many here will believe this same “international community actively intervened” there, as in a false-flag ops to gin up an excuse to bomb-bomb-bomb Iran?
Thanks for commenting. This site benefits from your insight and objectivity.
At a time when FDL is skewing Obamaward, your presence is welcome.
It was something like a 5 minute time lapse between when that incident occurred and Netanyahu publicly accusing/demonizing Iran. I’m surprised he waited that long.
I wonder just how successful this “civil war” would be if the “rebels” weren’t being armed by the CIA. And of course the Assad regime is being liberally supplied by the Russians and the Chinese, although Assad is officially still in charge of Syria of course.
Anyway, I am rather offended that most media outlets fail to mention essential facts like that. And that makes me think that this is more like propaganda than actual news.
C.I.A. Said to Aid in Steering Arms to Syrian Opposition
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/21/world/middleeast/cia-said-to-aid-in-steering-arms-to-syrian-rebels.html?_r=2&ref=global-home
It is unclear at this time what the Russian position is. The opposition met with Putin within the last couple of weeks and reportedly hinted that should they succeed Russia would not have the agreement for its naval base on the Mediterranean coast cancelled. While Russia liberally supplied Syria in the past, it is unclear how much they have supplied in the past year.
While it is not surprising that the CIA might be enabling arms shipments through Turkey (it is not clear where Turkey stands on arms shipments through its territory), Saudi Arabia is also shipping arms through Jordan likely using its own resources.
And one fact that is consistently overlooked is that Israel would like Assad to remain in power. A known leader is preferable to a regime that might take a stronger position on Palestine.
The Baath party elite that served Assad’s father is officially still in charge in Syria. Whether Assad himself has any independence from that elite remains for history to tell. It is entirely conceivable that Assad took power intended some reforms but was told the facts of life by the Baath party leadership. (Leaders do require obedient followers.)
References, please.
Israeli defense minister, chiefs discussing Syria
Israel can’t be too sanguine about the election of Mr. Morsy in Egypt. Imagine their opinion of a similar event in Syria. The devil you know…
That’s a lot of interesting, if irrelevant points.
The important thing to keep in mind here, which should be reported in every story including the one above, is that the “rebels” are proxies for the US CIA, and therefore proxies of Obama.
It’s pretty amusing that Obama and Hillary would allude to actions that they’re instigating as being evidence that the Syrian people want Assad gone.
At least John isn’t still calling the rebels Activists like he did in his last Syria post. It is disturbing to see this kind of distortion on a supposed progressive site.
So sorry that the complexity of my irrelevant points spoils your simple narrative. Are there proxies from the US CIA among the rebels? Most likely and not doubt there are also US CIA proxies inside the Assad regime as well.
And you demean the self-determination of hundreds of thousands of Syrians who have conducted peaceful protests for a year and a half (and still conduct them in the midst of civil war) seeking the opening up of the Baathist regime to other political forces.
Assad the reformer could have easily avoided this a year ago by co-opting these protests as Abdullah did in Jordan and Mohammed did in Morocco. Most likely Assad was not able to pursue a strategy of co-option because of the Baath establishment.
There are lots of outside players involved in this conflict now. And there are two dangers for the US. (1) The situation so destabilizes Syria that it becomes factionalized on the variety of ethnic and religious fault lines on a long-term basis, creating major refugee crises for Turkey, Iraq, and Jordan. (2) Those ethnic and religious conflicts spill over into Turkey, Iraq, and Jordan and create instability on the border with Israel.
TD:
AP:
No Israeli involvement. Yeah, sure, TD.
“John”? Who’s distorting what?
Ah. Bullshit humanitarian intervention/color revolution advocacy. Next thing you know, we’ll have to worry about Osama’s sons, who’ve taken up the cause, and TD can switch to fear mongering.
Did I ask for intervention? Has the US done yet what NATO did in Libya? Have you not read my opinion that intervention in Syria would exactly and precisely be counterproductive. Just because you are critical of US inteventionism (as am I) does not mean you have to come to the defense of every anti-US dictator in the world when the population decides that it has had enough.
My opinion here is exactly the same as it was regarding Egypt, Yemen, Bahrain, Libya, and Tunisia. The people of those countries have the legitimacy to decide their own rulers.
Those are not mutually exclusive positions.
Osama’s sons will need a movement and the popular movements throughout the Middle East are taking that away even as US overreach in Iraq and Afghanistan has diminished US capabilities for global empire. A lot of old narratives are being rendered obsolete. Yet to come: Bahrain, Yemen, Algeria, Morocco, Jordan, and Iran. The US will not succeed in shaping the Middle East to its will. The Middle East will be transformed into popular governments. And Israel will be isolated except for Uncle Sugar. That is just a matter of time. And Saudi Arabia is likely to be the Belarus of the Middle East, stubbornly resisting moving away from authoritarian government. Check back in five years.
Given the fact that Ahmedinejad has already announce that he is retiring, it is possible for Iran to have a popular election next year that opens up the government without amounting to a regime change. That would be the worst of worlds for the neo-con US interventionists. Especially if Iran succeeds in diplomatically taking away our “enemy” by coming to an agreement regarding its nuclear program. (And before you take off on that, my position is that both the US and Russia should have the same regime of transparency that they require of other NPT signatories and that Israel, India, and Pakistan should be pressured after that occurs to become signatories and submit to the same regime of transparency. Iran has the clear sovereign right to develop domestic peaceful uses of nuclear energy–although even that as shown by Fukushima is problematic.)
Comrade, first, you missed the quotes about jgordon’s “rebels”. Then you changed the protagonists to peaceful Syrian protesters. Then you accused jgordon of demeaning them.
Not very clean, comrade.
Say, do you have a percentage on the # of CIA-supplied “rebels” versus non-mercenaries? Oops, I almost forgot. Add in those Israeli-backed mercenaries with the CIA ones.
Now what were you accusing jgordon of again, comrade?
I was pointing out your irrelevant points because that is a common tactic of people who are trying to spread disinformation on internet forums.
I keep this bookmarked and reference it often for occasions such as this. Have a look:
http://cryptome.org/2012/07/gent-forum-spies.htm
Anyway, you are not being complex there, you’re being irrelevant. The CIA is arming the rebels. Therefore they are agents of a foreign government, i.e, the US, and it’s disingenuous to try to portray this as some sort of organic movement from within Syria. This is more of just another case of the US trying to set up yet another puppet government by using various proxies to hide what they are doing.
By the way, if you read through that list of how to spot forum spies, you’ll notice that you also display many of the other characteristics of them. You should work camouflaging yourself better.