Other states like Florida and Ohio may be bigger, but Nevada and its 6 electoral votes will be key in the fall. And the race in that state, along with a couple House races and a key Senate race that could determine control of the chamber, may come down to whether the Culinary Union engages in the fall or sits out the election.
The leader of the largest and most potent labor union in Nevada is threatening that he and his 55,000 foot-soldiers will sit out the fall elections in this crucial battleground for the Senate and the presidency. Culinary Local 226 has been a critical centerpiece in the vaunted Democratic get-out-the-vote efforts in Nevada. The union bused workers to the polls in 2010, helping propel Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to victory. In the 2008 presidential contest, its members helped carry the state for then-candidate Barack Obama.
But this year D. Taylor, secretary-treasurer of the union, said that the fall campaigns aren’t a priority. With all their contracts with local unionized casinos expired and a bitter organizing fight underway with the non-union Station Casinos chain, Taylor said that the group is at capacity.
“We really divide between two things, which [are] our contracts and Stations,” Taylor told National Journal. “I’ve told everybody if we don’t have those settled, or some of them settled, we’re not going to lie to you and tell you we’re going to be involved politically.”
Taylor isn’t bashful about wanting some help from the same Democratic politicians the union has helped elect over the years. But such assistance has not been forthcoming. “Sometimes the Democrats wonder why workers don’t rally around them. It’s because they really don’t rally around workers in time of need,” he said.
We’ve seen a couple instances over the past few days of chickens coming home to roost. In Florida, the Obama campaign is struggling to find their voters after years of foreclosures. Now, in Nevada, Democrats could pay the price for failing to stand behind labor and simply expecting to use them as foot soldiers in get-out-the-vote efforts.
Very few unions could pull off this kind of power play. But the Culinary Union in Nevada, the virtual home of the hospitality industry, can. They have a large membership base of cooks and housekeepers and hotel personnel in the main population centers of the state. And they have the ability to mobilize those voters, particularly the Latino voters who make up 45% of their membership, as we saw in the re-election of Harry Reid in 2010. As I noted, there are key downballot races in Nevada, in addition to the Presidential contest. Shelley Berkley and Dean Heller are in a neck-and-neck race for the US Senate. And at least one and possibly two House seats are in play.
This is another case where concerns about the economy matter more to the rank and file than who wins an election. Nevada is another foreclosure crisis ground zero, and will give candidates the same challenges as in Florida. And unions like this one feel abandoned on an economic justice level by both parties.
It’s possible this is just posturing to get political support for a series of upcoming contract negotiations. Union leaders said they would suspend their political activities last year, and most of them have come running back to the Democratic fold. Taylor, the leader of the union, did refer to a crisis that would result from Republicans winning the election. So it’s unclear this will hold. But for now, the failure to stand behind unions could lead, in a key state, to unions declining to stand behind Democrats.




46 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
I think this passage from the article is pretty telling:
Unions it seems to me face a choice that is similar (when viewed at a 30,000 foot level) to progressives. Republicans show little to no interest in our values. Democrats, however, are not really any better. While Democrats talk like they share our values, one just needs to follow the money and their actions, and you can see their allegiance lies.
Yes, that’s the Catch-22. It’s why unions and other like-minded people need to take over the local chapters of the Democratic Party where ever they can.
The end of the Democratic Party may well be the best thing that could happen for working Americans. Maybe then a true and progressive Labor Party can rise from the ashes of a corrupt and complicit Democratic Party. Obama and his faux bipartisanship has done more to destroy the Democratic “brand” since, well, Bill Clinton.
the dems have left the working class – specifically the unions – to flounder on their own, like a fish out of water. In most cases, the dems have helped to kill off unions – and the big O is leading the pack at this time, but it has been happening for 30 years.
Cutting off your nose to spite your face.
Does Mr. Taylor REALLY think that having Republicans control everything is going to benefit his union more than the Democrats? One only look to the craziness against unions in Republican controlled states that is going on for an answer.
I’m not happy about a lot of things with Obama, but . . .
There must be a few crumbs Reid can throw to make union leaders cave.
Good. No more Mr.
NiceguyDoormat.Better to be feared than
likedtolerated.The foreclosure crisis has been devastating and so unnecessary. Cramdown should have been allowed years ago instead of the faux HAMP modifications which as Barofsky confirms were for and by the banks. Yeah, Obama can go pound sand for my vote, ain’t gonna happen.
Preaching to the choir nik.
My Ouija board, which is pretty damn accurate, says that a third party movement, comprised of disaffected union workers, middle class from both right and left of “center”, will unite. They won’t be able to effectively “run” candidates. Biut they will be able, with perhaps 13-16% of the vote, affect elections directly.
BT, see my #9. I’m ready and willing. Resigned my precinct chair post for democratic party in my county.
I think John Wilhelm is the head of UNITE-HERE.
It’s sort of the perfect storm — one state of vital importance where one and only one union can make a critical difference, and it’s headed up by one of the few union leaders willing to play that kind of chicken.
No doubt Trumka’s saying “oh that crazy John Wilhelm, what can you do” — whether there’s a “wink wink” there or not.
But the culinary workers most definitely did have a critical impact in the Reid election, and now nobody seems to remember that. Good for Wilhelm for using his leverage when it matters.
I honestly think the only salvation for our country is a third (labor) party. See my #9.
BTW, I enjoy your comments and perspective.
Actually, no. NJ Senate president Stephen Sweeney is an officer of Ironworkers Local 399(six figures a year) and state senator Donald Norcross is the president of the Southern New Jersey AFL-CIO Central Labor Council. Hasn’t made a noticeable beneficial difference for ordinary people. Sweeney, in fact, is hand in glove with Christie and the Norcross brothers are notorious for their deals. The latest, that’s publicly known, is the Rutgers reorg. I don’t want unions taking over county parties.
Jane, you’re old enough to remmebr what a respectaboe candidate John Anderson was. Didn’t he garner around 13-14% of th eppopular vote?
Corrrection….. While Anderson polled at one point as high as 22%, he finished the ’80 election with only 7% of th epopular vote.
Well, that is assuming that there are jobs for people to actually “have”… beyond the “service sector”, ncg.
Remember, the clever folks, aided and abetted by the “traditional” political class have, “profitably”, done away with jobs … and now this nation cannot produce what it needs, nor provide worthwhile endeavor for the human beings who need jobs.
Ah, well …
DW
One needs to remember what the big O said – I believe it was in 2010 – “Many of these jobs will not be coming back.” Spoken like a true corp. supporter and anti worker. Also, remember the stump speech in 08 – “I’ll put on my tenis shoes and walk the picket lines with you.”
Per Jane’s response: I remember when Trumka took control of the United Mine Workers of America (UMWA). The UMWA controled 85% of all coal production in the US – now the union controls 8% of production. Trumka has some good ideas from time to time but he always falls in line with the Dem machine when push comes to shove.
Not to argue, but to quote Colonel Jessup from “A Few Good Men”…
“You want us on that wall you need us on that wall.”
The rich, the filhy rich, and the filthier rich desperately need the 99%. The problem, only a small % of them seem to realize that.
WHo do the Romneys think cleans the shit out of the horse stall????
Man, I had totally forgotten that line. Of course, there are soooo many statements and promises he made……..back then.
…and Ronald Reagan was elected over an incumbent Democratic president in a bad economy. That would be the Reagan who broke up the air-controllers union.
I’m sure there is a lesson to be learned here….
Dude, I consider you FDL’s Mahareshi Mahesh Yogi.
Especially since the air traffic controllers union endorsed Reagan. They were a very conservative, corporatish bunch and they never dreamed their guy would stomp on them.
Right, TBogg, it is time, past time, to listen to rational third party ideas …
Time to realize that it is time for actual, real, and substantive change … away from failed, arrogant, and pathological manipulation.
Or do you imagine that there is only ONE lesson to be taken from history?
Which is precisely “what” … to embrace “more of the same” … because we must be afraid to try anything else?
DW
Congratulations.
Guess you could say their firing was poetic justice for supporting Reagan. Labor continues to make the same mistakes, on purpose I’m sure.
After voting straight Democratic tickets from 2004 until 2008 I sat home in 2010.
Do I feel bad that Democrats got creamed? No–in fact I’m happy. And I look forward to even more creaming coming this time for their multiple unforgivable betrayals. I also knew that politics was ugly, but prior to Obama I was still pretty naive I guess.
Got a letter from the IRS. They’re auditing me.
Think that’s just a coincidence????
Obama came to a knife fight armed with marshmallows, he didn’t want to hurt his friends on the other side of the aisle. In fact he resurrected a “brand” that should have been disgraced and ostracized for a generation if not longer.
Wonder if Romney’s being audited? I know the answer.
You are right, of course. Uncritical support of a candidate can come back to bite you in the bum. Perhaps the air traffic controllers would have gotten better results if they had held Reagan’s feet to the fire? Somehow?
Maybe O will magically appear in Nevada to speak out for the unions, right after he locates his work boots and retroactively goes to Wisconsin to offer his support against Walker’s recall.
It’s more appropriate to compare the 1% to the vampires who need the lifeblood of the 99% to survive. They seem impervious to the concept that when they exhaust their food supply they will die.
You do realize that you are responding to O’s No.1 apologist,supporter, and fan at FDL, don’t you?
Given the choice between using one’s finite resources to tend to one’s own interests and essentially burning those resources on backstabbing politicians… well, any competent leader would choose the former option over the latter.
Forget about “leverage.” This is about survival. Every dollar labor ponies up for Democrats is a dollar they can’t use on organizing and strike funds. And by the looks of it, the Culinary workers may need a strike fund.
So the choice is obvious. What’s amazing is why more unions haven’t been doing this for years now.
But what? Why is it the apologists can’t even finish their concluding sentences? Could it be that by floating a fill-in-the-blank statement they can avoid saying something obviously ridiculous?
TBOGG, the lesson you refer to is what, exactly? Why not end with, “We know how well that worked out”? Dog forbid we should deign to make proper distinctions!
I’ve been a registered Democrat since 1978. I worked on Democratic campaigns (for a living) for six years. I was there when the Clintonoids put the death grip on anything labeled “populist.” I was there when leadership was telling us to downgrade labor’s importance to the Party… all in the midst of my efforts at liaising with them! Ditto for feminist groups and enviro groups. That was in the early ’90s and it’s been downhill all the way since then.
If the apologists have a point to make, they should make it. But this asinine Jr. High School “rhetoric” is just pathetic. If there’s a substantive argument to make in support of whomever or whatever, then damn well make it.
The union really is in a heck of a struggle right now with their core mission. It seems less a power play and more a pragmatic response to practical reality. Reid has a really good relationship with the Unions (miners too). Berkley, not so much – not a hostile relationship that I know of or anything, just not really a part of her political persona.
There are plenty of folks in Nevadan unions who aren’t Democrats (nor liberals) – plenty more in the service industry at non-union houses. If Station employees watch the union that’s offering to look out for worker interests divert resources from a contract struggle and important organizing effort … to elect people many workers don’t even care to see in office … what are the chances Station will go union? I’d say far less than if the union focused on it’s members more or less exclusively beyond politicians that can be held up as proven allies that justify support.
IMO, we’re going to see what folks predicted for 2010 in Nevada happen in 2012. I don’t think Reid is going to burn his grassroots for Obama or Berklee this cycle.
Good point, I was thinking about that too. Union leadership needs to think about return on investment for its members. Depending on the size of the union’s coffers, spending money and effort on political campaigns that at best may only indirectly benefit them might not be the smart thing to do.
These people are suffering from a neurotic condition known as partisanship. They’re unable to distinguish the fact that the unitary party duopoly is the face of the corporations engaging in Kabuki Theatre to distract and mollify the masses.
It seems that those at the top of the food chain are, in spite of their rhetoric, sociopaths who are totally insensitive to the needs of their constituencies.
I agree completely. The Democratic Party has become an obstacle to progress. It has eliminated dissent within its ranks (for example, Daily Kos, once the “crashing the gates” blog, has become a de facto communications and fund-raising arm of the DNC). Meanwhile, Barack Obama, nominally a Democrat, has all but eliminated dissent outside the system.
With friends like the Democrats, who needs Republicans?
I think it’s more correct to say the ATC unions never imagined that the other unionized employees in the airline industry would fail to back them up when push came to shove. Up to that point, the pact of solidarity would result in every member of any union expanding the strikes to shut down the airlines and other related targets. Instead, the whole industry broke the picket lines and happily flew with scab controllers. That was a largely unprecedented union leadership decision at the time – and against the entire solidarity credo. Regan won in no small part because nobody in the union movement would cover the backs of the controllers.
Same thing happened with the coal unions in W.Va and Kentucky at almost the exact same time. The national organizations refused to support locals striking (against Massey I think) with a wider industrial action – instead union labor kept the corporation’s profits flowing (along with donations to the Democratic party) as the locals were targeted, broken and organizers blackballed. Now there are less that 14,000 union workers in the region and Massey mines are killing people left and right. Democrats never talk about that one because there’s nobody to blame but Trumka and his associations with certain Democratic politicians who profited from the coal industry … and it forces them to discuss the failure of abandoning the idea of “an injury to one is an injury to all” in favor of protecting the interests of powerful Democrats in exchange for “a seat at the table.”
Those Regan-era corporatist were hardly the first to try and break the unions. What changed in the 80s is union leaders ascended to power who consistently refuse to rise with powerful actions in response to the challenge. As such, an entire generation has forgotten what solidarity means. Now all we’re left with is a simplistically revisionist telling of an all-powerful Regan at the dawn of the age of modern political kabuki.
Superb comment, kgb.
DW
Actually, given the level of pedantic insults being issued, I’d say it’s more about cowing people into submission.
The problem is, it doesn’t work.
Indeed, this also applies to every “progressive” group (enviro, womens groups, whathaveyou) that are putting resources into a Party’s activities that don’t benefit them at all.
Millions are being sucked up into the Party funding machine and it’s all a massive waste, when people could be funding issue-based organizing instead. In this sense, it’s deleterious to the cause.
Never imagined? How could a union plan a strike and not consult? But, I gather from your comments, the ATC headmen didn’t line up their support before going out. Isn’t that basic event planning? Aren’t the top people supposed to have contingency plans?
It’s pretty obvious now that unions aren’t holding together, don’t even much talk to one another. Each isolated org huddled up behind the wagons. As much as anything else, union “leadership” isn’t–and hasn’t been for many years.
Taft-Hartley was the kneecap, but the middle management salarymen who moved into the top ranks after the firebrands were driven out are shameless.
Your comment, playing of kgb’s, is also superb, liberalarts, especially the last sentence.
Unions, in this country, especially during the last fifty years, have been all about cunning, cozy capitulation to the masters … about empty rhetoric and political submission, about abandoning principle AND manipulating the rank and file, in service to the petty, self-serving ambitions of union “leadership”.
DW