CNN managed to do some news reporting outside of reading viewer Twitter feeds today, and they came up with a loophole in the STOCK Act that would render it fairly meaningless. If you remember, the STOCK Act was the bill that rocketed to passage after allegations of insider trading among members of Congress, using at times non-public information to profit off of companies over which they held oversight responsibilities. The bill, which languished for years, was quickly taken up and passed with overwhelming majorities. But it turns out that there’s a potentially gaping hole in the legislation:
The STOCK Act requires that any trades of $1,000 or more made on or after July 3 have to be reported to the House and Senate within 45 days. But the House and Senate have two completely different interpretations of that rule.
In the Senate, the Ethics Committee released one page of guidelines last month ruling that members and their spouses and dependent children all have to file reports after they make stock or securities trades. But the House Ethics Committee disagreed.
Its 14-page memo notifies House members and aides covered by the law that their spouses and children aren’t covered. The Office of Government Ethics, which oversees all federal executive branch employees, sided with the House, informing its employees that their spouses and children don’t need to file these periodic reports.
Both of the lead sponsors of the Senate bill didn’t realize the discrepancy until CNN brought it to their attention.
So in the House, currently led by Republicans, you could just advise your husband or wife of the non-public information gleaned from your position as a Congresscritter, have them trade on it with family resources, and nobody would be the wiser. The Senate didn’t add a loophole this craven in the interpretation of the law. So now you have two versions of one bill that was signed into law, which could get chaotic when applied in practice.
Gotta love Congress.




38 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
“Gotta love Congress.”
It must be coinkdinky that Congress is universally loathed, and enjoys its lowest “positives” … ever.
I guess “Congress” just doesn’t care … which seems to be their “stock in trade …”
Why should they, who is going to hold them to account?
What is it “they” say?
Oh yes, “The people get the government they deserve …”
Don’t ya just lurve it?
DW
What a racket.
Now we know why someone would spend a fortune to secure a position that pays less than $200K per year. I’m sure the “Democrats” will work hard to defeat this measure before it gets passed and agreed upon by the Senate.
If a member of Congress gives his spouse or child (or anyone, for that matter) non-public information about a publicly traded company and the recipient of the info acts on it, wouldn’t that be run-of-the-mill insider trading?
Politics is a racket.
What do you think Elliot, would Smedley Butler agree with that sentiment, now?
DW
Politicians and their spouses are the insiders.
It’s kind of like the tree in the woods, botazefa; if it’s secret and nobody is allowed to find out, Congressional Privilege, you know, then has anything “happened” … at all?
DW
Politicians mounting a scaffold could give them pause in their criminal ways.
aw common,….. they didn’t know,
cause, whoooooooops……. it just got
“slipped in”
and, whaddddya know, it benefits them.
Dick ” so ? ” Cheney was right, it doesn’t matter what you think. doesn’t matter one bit.
now, get back to work.
Crap. I forgot about that. So, it probably is insider trading but we’ll never know. Lovely.
Ya’ gotta know this stuff really pisses Martha Stewart off. Isn’t SHE really the only one who ever put dust ruffles on a prison cot????
I am sure that any loopholes that were intentionally worked into the act are just oversights.
Actually, I have a solution.
Let’s get all the legislaturds sign a “Grover Nordquistesque” pledget to never do that.
Either that OR the oversights were intentionally worked into the bill.
OR, is that just a poTATo, PoTOTo argument????
You masher, you!
Pretty chippper, aren’t you, ncg?
The Democrats would NEVER allow intentional oversight ….
Wait! That’s not right …
The democrats would never, would nev … over see detention … um …
THE … Democrats would … they just wouldn’t, just ask that yogi guy you were talkin’ to, on that other thread … he’ll tell ya … yeah, that’s it … he’ll set … ya straight.
;~DW
From CNN story
So each house can write up it’s own copy of a bill to vote on, and when they realize there’s a discrepancy they don’t need to do anything about it unless CNN finds out about it?
And … even if the Dems do … “do it” they is not so evil as them other guys.
Just think how bad things would be if the Dems didn’t have our best innerest at hard …
You ask why the Dems ain’t raisin’ heck ’bout this?
How do you know they ain’t?
Betcha Barack is right on top of this …
And Timmeh, he wouldn’t tolerate no shenanigans like this …
Bet it’s in the news tomorrow.
(Snark … or not.)
;~DW
Another way of looking at my previous comment was a meta-comment on how politicians abuse logic, language, and natural law whenever they think they can get away with it.
already at wiki
By Jove!
Without a doubt, jgordan, you have laid “it” out, plain and true.
DW
Even Gen. Smedley Butler would be appalled at what’s SOP today.
So Cantor did it?
This means that every other member of the House will rise up in protest … presumably.
I wonder when the rest of us will hear about the uprising … or would that be kept, “in House”?
Thank you for that Wikipedia “catch”, Elliot.
The word is out.
Let’s see what happens …
DW
I consider that you are correct, hbb.
DW
Remove the “probably” and your comment is correct.
If Butler was to make his revelations in.re. his service amounting to being a corporate enforcer today, he’d be “disappeared” or “droned”.
Not only is it “dump day” Friday, but the only tragedy of importance is the shooting in Colorado. I wonder what else they’re going to be able to accomplish while the public is distracted by that.
I’m sure that CNN, the Congressional News Network, will expend whatever time and energy is necessary to bring this to the attention of the sheeple, or not.
Again, you are very likely correct, hbb.
DW
No you don’t. You have a single version of the bill that was passed by both houses of Congress:
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:S.2038:/
Where the House Ethics Committee and the Senate Ethics Committee are setting up different guidelines. Also you’ll note that the House guidelines apply to the White House – not under Republicans – because that’s how they want it, rather than having the stricter rules of the Senate apply to the White House.
So there’s bipartisan agreement on transparency where the Obama administration wants to be like Republicans. Also if it is to be believed that the Senators who sponsored the bill didn’t know what was in it, that reflects badly on them – read legislation before you vote on it, afterall that’s what you’re paid for.
I’m sure Nancy Pelosi’s husband is livid over this alleged oversight
I’m glad I didn’t have any liquid in my hand or was taking a sip, si …
As it is, the wee doggie, thinks I’ve gone off my rocker (actually its a swivel-chair) with laughter …
DW
I can see this is startin’ to kinda…..grate on you. You’re startin’ to stutter.
Every day, something else. Another promise broken. If it ain’t the president, it’s Timmy. If it ain;’t Timmy, its the attorney general…what’s his name?
You hang in there.
And,Cantor’s wife, Diana, is a former Goldman, Sachs & Co. vice president and is now a partner in Alternative Investment Management LLC.
just a co-winkydink, no doubt.
I’m thinkin’ about taking a drive up to Ithaca, and havin’ an order of Hal’s
poTATo PANcakes, then I’m headin’ over to Aroma Pizza …
Yeah, if it ain’t “fixed”, then it’s broken … and some wag says, “We’re all, equally, to blame …”
We’ve already been hung out to fry … I reckon.
If it ain’t POTUS, it’s SCOTUS, and if it ain’t them … it’s Congress.
Damned bush … all three “branches” are rotten, to the corps’ … desire.
Take care, ncg.
DW
Winky, winky, nod, nod, Helena.
It’s cozy at the “top” … high and … inside.
DW
Ha! You ares such a card…
Let’s fix that loophole and fix it NOW. Time to crank up the pressure and throw these s***s out of office and put them all under surveillance for the rest of their lives…these are the bad apples in out social barrel.
POTUS, SCOTUS, and CONGRUS …
Pokus, jokus, and snookus …
Mopus, dopus, and screwus …
Flatuos, contemptuous, and blovious …
How much more can go onerous?
When ya add in the lamestream medious how can things become any more odious?
When the primary function of the political classious is to the masters to be toadious?
Politics ain’t “clean” but this nation’s must be just about the most groadious.
DW