Just to show what a bullet we may potentially dodge with Cass Sunstein out of government, consider this postscript to his career:
The outgoing White House regulations chief circulated industry attacks on proposed smog standards among high-level advisers to President Obama, emails released to The Hill through a FOIA request show.
Cass Sunstein, the regulatory official, ensured that White House aides including Nancy-Ann DeParle and Heather Zichal were made aware of powerful business groups’ concerns with plans to tighten ozone standards, a proposal that was subsequently put on ice. The debate consumed parts of the administration in 2011.
Records obtained under a Freedom of Information Act request also show efforts by lobbyists to appeal to White House officials on other rules, providing a window onto how industry groups sought to press their case with senior aides at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.
The ozone standards delay represents one of the biggest regulatory failures of the past few years, with the White House clearly siding with industry over their own Environmental Protection Agency, which considered the update of the standards vital to public health. Subsequently, the Administration did move forward on mercury and air toxics standards, soot pollution standards as well as greenhouse gas emissions standards that will damage the ability to produce coal in America. But the ozone punt was really unforgivable, especially given the context:
Basically, what happened is that the Bush Administration dragged its feet on new national ozone standards for years. Under the law, there must be a five-year review. EPA’s review of the science in 2006 showed that the current standards, set in 1997, were woefully inadequate. The Bush Administration countered with a new rule in 2008 that was well below the recommendation from EPA scientists.
And then…
Groups such as the American Lung Association quickly filed a lawsuit to stop the Bush rules, which they claimed were too weak and would lead to thousands of unnecessary deaths and cases of respiratory disease. However, when Obama came into office, the new EPA said it basically agreed with the critics and would issue revised rules by August 2010. At that point, the ALA agreed to hold off on its lawsuit. But August 2010 rolled around. Still no rules. Then October. Then November. Still nothing. Then the EPA said it wanted to go back and look at the science again, just to double-check. Sure enough, EPA’s scientific review board said that 60 to 70 parts per billion was the way to go. And EPA administrator Lisa Jackson announced that the final rules would be more or less in line with the science [...]
So now, today, the White House announced that it’s not going to have any new rules. On a call with reporters, White House officials argued that it doesn’t make sense to put out new rules in 2011 when there’s going to be another scheduled review of the ozone science in 2013.
(This is untrue by the way, if EPA set the standards in 2011, there wouldn’t be another review until 2016.)
So they got the environmental and public health groups to back off for two years, and then dropped this bombshell. Green groups have now resumed their lawsuit.
And now we have a good look at the reasons why. Basically, then-Chief of Staff Bill Daley and Cass Sunstein met with a bunch of oil and chemical lobbyists, Sunstein sent around objections to the rule from the National Association of Manufacturers and the Business Roundtable, and even quotes from House Republicans opposed to the standards, and all that was enough to make the case for delay. Lucky for the White House, Cass Sunstein was hyping business community attacks to help them make their decision.
In addition to passing around oil industry talking points inside the White House, Sunstein also forwarded along more obscure industry talking points:
Beyond EPA, other agencies grabbed the attention of Sunstein, such as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), which has proposed to strengthen protections against silica.
Brian Slobodow, then-CEO of the U.S. Silica Co., wrote a July 2011 letter to Sunstein urging him “to return the proposal to OSHA for further evaluation of risks, benefits and costs.”
In a subsequent email, Sunstein forwarded the letter onto DeParle, Lane and senior aide Chris Lu, saying, “Worth a look.”
OIRA, Sunstein’s office, has held up the silica regulation for a year.
I don’t expect this to go away once Sunstein leaves, but, and this is important, I expect Sunstein to go away. Thank the Lord for small favors.




24 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
One sincerely hopes that Sunstein will “go away”, DDay. Fervently.
However, if Barack Obama “wins” this erection, then what are the chances that Sunstein will be nominated to SCOTUS … even as you mentioned the other day?
THAT worry won’t “go away” for … four more years …
Can you imagine Sunstein at SCOTUS for life?
Sunstein, the grift that keeps on grifting …
And now, back to being thankful for smallish favors.
DW
You shall auto-punish for not abiding the noodge’s nudges.
It’s a religious fantasy fulfilled.
Hell was made for an asshole like this guy.
“Good Day, Sun____…” No, I know it’s time for me to stop — esp. now that I inadvertently got the pack all in a …goodbye ;^)
This is his legacy:
http://www.salon.com/2010/01/15/sunstein_2/
“However, if Barack Obama “wins” this erection, then what are the chances that Sunstein will be nominated to SCOTUS … even as you mentioned the other day?”
Democrats would go on to being full on corporatist right wingers even moreso than they are now with Obama and his corporatecare and more extremist national security policies than Bush. Since it is a Democrat that is ruling a certain way, not only will it be called liberal, Sunstein’s rulings would be called progressive.
Don’t be so sure. Holder is stepping down at the end of the first term.
Next guy will be worse. Not just delay more regs, but formally dismantle the ones that are there. Nonenforcement is not good enough.
If anyone is shocked at such slavish devotion to the needs of corporations over the health of our citizenry and our planet then they have just not been paying attention.
Obama is no more or no less guilty of corporate toadyism than is any politician in need of vast sums for re-election.
You’re right, Cal Sunstein is perfectly horrible. Whoever hired him needs to be fired ASAP.
I seem to detect a “pattern” in the comments, here.
Perhaps, it is time to cease supporting “more of the same”?
At some point it must be asked if the currently “configured”, ruling “government” is, by ANY honest and worthwhile definition, “legitimate” …
Perhaps, the answer to THAT question might just suggest “something”?
Who would agree? … Things will get worse …
Who would agree? … None dare call it treason …
DW
Sunstein and wife ,Powers ,are the Obama’s closet friends .Did they have a falling out or is that an inconvenient truth ?
Hey DW we can’t handle that kind of truth.I thought we came here to pretend we have some power to change the system .If we start believing the system is rotten with fraud,then we need to ask how far these kleptocrats will go ,then someone will say that depends on how low we will go . …lets just play pretend : “”hey DW we need to reform Glass Steagall “” .Hey ,now I’m having fun again ,and still can pretend I’m a serious person .
I stopped thinking the system could be changed after I observed here the umpteenth approach to doing so without evaluating the umpteenth minus one efforts & why they failed.
If you ask “How is that going to happen”* in response to some hortatory about “we need to do is….” you get talking points & more hortatories back.
*Which I did on a recent book salon with the added phrase “when the U.S. can’t even find two reasonable people to run for POTUS.”
Sorry DW, that last phrase completely killed my agitation.
Had a conversation with a very bright good person type the other day. She defending and advocating more and more compromise with the right. As I pressed several points in opposition to that strategy. She said well if I stand up to them and advocate for what we think is right I am afraid they will burn my house down.
“They” have won. It no longer makes any difference who we vote for.
Press-ted-dagitation … flat-lined grumption … that’s dead certain, Ludwig.
Tree, son … yew gonna pine fir gawine maple a bit tulip rantin’ about being sycamore crapola and while it’s oak kay by me … well, yah might just want ta spruce up yer delivery just a poplar amount, so’s ya can bank on the evergreen notion of just how far “they” wood go against the grain of da-mock-cracy and sew forth and sow on.
Remindin’ me of the blind carpenter who picked up his hammer and saw …
Shore ’nuff!
DW
I’ve said before that Obama’s next pick for the Supreme Court will be a judicial right winger. Sunstein may be the guy.
ME going just the way Rummy planned it, according to new book (I think), and Wesley Clarke had the DoD sources that said same thing awhile ago. Knocking one regime over after another.
Oh, he’ll be back. Trust me. People like that never really go away.
Ya got that right.
Negroponte, Rove, to name just two.
Rummy & Cheney were around since Ford. And participated in that succession of govt hiding out in a mountain cave somewhere even when they were not in govt. My hackles are raised over that one (what happened to it anyhow, what was its purpose, etc).
Romney’s foreign policy team is all neocons & his domestic policy team is all Mormons. What could go wrong.
Oh wait. It could be O’s teams.
Ding.
Encourage her to lay low & do nothing. No point in either encouraging the right nor voting for the we-suck-less party.
Until we figure out something we can do that will actually, ya know, well, change something, there is no point in doing anything one way or the other.
Ah, you meant that they are willing to pull out the “None Dare Call It Treason” trump card. Yes (as if I needed more amygdala jangling.)
I’m with you, comrade.
We need to make them afraid, very afraid, that we will burn down their banks.