Standard Chartered Bank avoided a contentious Wednesday hearing that could have led to the revocation of their ability to do business in the state of New York, by reaching a settlement with the state Department of Financial Services for $340 million over widespread money laundering charges. This is a bit less than some of the rumors that came out yesterday about the negotiations, but it does include a monitor for New York to enforce compliance.
As part of the agreement, the bank agreed to install an on-site monitor for at least two years who will report directly to state officials. New York regulators will also place examiners at the bank. As a result of the accord, announced today by the state in an e-mailed release, the hearing that had been scheduled for tomorrow has been adjourned.
On Aug. 6, Benjamin Lawsky, head of the New York Department of Financial Services, or DFS, issued an order accusing Standard Chartered of helping Iran launder about $250 billion in violation of federal laws. One analyst estimated loss of the bank’s New York license could result in a 40 percent drop in earnings.
“The New York State Department of Financial Services and Standard Chartered Bank have reached an agreement to settle the matters raised in the DFS Order dated Aug. 6, 2012,” Lawsky said in the statement. “The parties have agreed that the conduct at issue involved transactions of at least $250 billion.”
A person familiar with the case said that Lawsky had sought as much as $700 million to settle the investigation. Julie Gibson, a spokeswoman for Standard Chartered, didn’t immediately return a call seeking comment on the settlement.
So Lawsky got about half as much as the initial offer. But when this initially came up, Standard Chartered denied that the transactions at issue were as high as $250 billion, which would have significantly lowered the final settlement cost.
In addition, this does not end the legal trouble for Standard Chartered. This only resolves the issues with the New York Department of Financial Services. Federal regulators (including Treasury, the Federal Reserve and the Justice Department) as well as the Manhattan District Attorney must now enter into their negotiations, and if they cannot get as much as the DFS, it will be completely embarrassing. This could cost Standard Chartered at least double this initial figure.
The good news is that New York’s Attorney General, Eric Schneiderman, while watching his counterpart at DFS force a much higher cost on Standard Chartered for their activities, did take action today on bath salts in Rockland County. Incidentally, if he wants to spend his term working on drug crimes, there are plenty of those on Wall Street as well!




15 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Dday, you are fast. I say, superfast. This story was posted by WaPo from the AP wire less than forty minutes ago:
Associated Press, Updated: Tuesday, August 14, 2:20 PM
I guess now we can say “You fucking stupid UK bank criminals. Who are you to tell us, the rest of the world, that you can deal with Iranians without paying through the nose?”
If STAN actually does pay the $340 mil, that would work out to $5,666.67 for each of the 60,000 criminal money laundering transfers.
The NY Times’s version of this story has this one orphan line in the middle with no facts reported to explain the implicit smear of Lawsky:
The federal [non-]regulators couldn’t be jealous, could they?
[from the Bloomberg link in the main post]
Since today ends with “y”, it’s time for a SEC slap on the wrist:
Wells Fargo to pay $6.5 mln to settle MBS charge
Not sure if these were the exact same charges by the SEC which resulted in the teeny $6 mil fine today, but back in March one of the SEC’s cases against WFC was described as involving nearly $60 billion in residential mortgage-backed securities.
Back in March, the SEC publicized its motion to compel production of documents in compliance with the SEC’s subpoenas issued since September 2011 regarding those $60 billion in RMBS. That court action was filed by the San Francisco regional office.
In fact, today’s puny settlement does not seem to involve the $60 Billion in RMBS, because it was settled by the Chicago regional office.
Excuse me. Wait. Sorry. Hold up there, pard.
Why the fuck are we ‘enter’ing ‘negotiations’ with admitted international criminals? Why aren’t we tearing their bank apart and sending their executives to prison?
This is fucking sick.
We have spent the last couple of years saying that we might be willing to go to war with Iraq if these sanctions don’t produce results. And now we have a foreign bank more or less admitting that it was involved in crooked deals to evade the sanctions and helping preserve the horrible terrorist regime that we claim is about to build a bomb and wreck the world.
Why isn’t the state department, defense department, white house and everybody else all over this bank and throwing the managers into GITMO as enemies in the global war on terror? They did it to some poor guy who sent a pair of socks to his brother in Afghanistan. I thought we didn’t negotiate with terrorists, and anybody who helped them is liable to get a cruise missile down his chimney.
>>
I thought under NDAA-2012 that ‘folks’ who consort with ‘terrorists’ are to be renditioned to the most distant Gitmo-Gulag that the US military operates for torture & to be held without being charged for eternity…just ’cause the POTUS sez so
oh…my bad : that’s only for journalists, professors and protestors (hedges, chomsky & me)
- – support this system to your own peril my friends
Thanks for the post.
Same day, same bullshit, same lies, same 1% making hay while the sun shines, same bullshit (to be redundant).
Liars.
The 1% pays a 1.4% service fee. Fucking joke.
Excuse my math. A 0.14% service fee. A ten times bigger fucking joke.
Thank you, thank you, thank you.
Until frog marching starts happening, this is just the cost of doing business, like lights or gas or telephone for me and you.
My sentiments exactly. This is a Win?
Bidness is bidness. Mafr left this link on my recent Standard Chartered post when I tried to remember the many American-based multinationals who’d broken sanctions. Think UAE.
This is all the New York Department of Financial Services could do. They have no prosecutory authority. The guy who does in New York, Eric Schneiderman, checked out on this. DFS embarrassed state and federal regulators despite its limited mandate and maximized the pain to the bank.