Rumors are rampant that Todd Akin will withdraw from the US Senate race in Missouri, but that has not been confirmed at this point. All we know is that he dug himself a larger hole with his appearance on Mike Huckabee’s radio show:
“We all make mistakes,” Akin said, disowning his previous comments that victims of “legitimate rape” can somehow prevent getting pregnant. “The many people who supported me know that when you make a mistake what you need to do is say you’re sorry.” [...]
Akin said in an interview broadcast on Sunday that in the case of “legitimate rape” the female body can resist pregnancy and “has ways to shut that whole thing down.” Many doctors have disputed the statement, saying it has no scientific basis.
Akin said on Monday that he “was talking about forcible rape and it was exactly the wrong word.”
“Rape is never legitimate,” Akin added.
Akin apparently doesn’t understand why people are upset. Yes, legitimate rape is an odious term, but so is “forcible rape,” as if there’s some kind of non-forcible, playful rape out there. Statutory rape is a good enough term to make it distinct from, well, rape. There’s no need for “forcible” to get added in there.
The real wrench that Akin has thrown into the mix is that he’s confirmed that Paul Ryan believes in the “forcible rape” distinction as well:
Paul Ryan also co-sponsored HR 3, the “No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion” bill in which Republicans tried to redefine rape so that it only applied to “forcible” rape so those fake rape victims would stop exploiting loopholes to cash in on fabulous gifts and prizes. Republicans pulled that part out of the bill so everyone would stop criticizing them, and then they tried to sneak it back in anyway.
The President twisted the knife a bit today, speaking at a news conference and stating firmly that “rape is rape,” which is quite an amazing statement for a President to have to make.
“Rape is rape,” Obama said at a White House press briefing. He called Akin’s comments “way out there.”
Defining rape, he said, “doesn’t make sense to the American people and doesn’t make sense to me.”
“What I think these comments do underscore is why we shouldn’t have a bunch of politicians, the majority of which are men, making decisions that affect health of women,” Obama said.
There’s no doubt in my mind that the Republican establishment is trying its best to get Akin to exit stage right. Sitting Senators want him to resign. The chair of the National Republican Senatorial Committee thinks he should think long and hard about “what is best.” Crossroads GPS, which has spent millions bashing Claire McCaskill in Missouri, just pulled all its ads.
There’s actually a time frame here:
Akin, who is running for U.S. Senate against incumbent Claire McCaskill, has until Tuesday at 5 p.m. to withdraw without a court order, according to Missouri election law. That law allows candidates to leave the ballot 11 weeks before election day, otherwise he would need a court order, which he can get up until Sept. 25. The Republican state committee would have two weeks to name a replacement, under the law.
Anti-choice groups are still firmly behind Akin, and he pronounced himself “not a quitter” today, so I wouldn’t necessarily count him out.
UPDATE: Akin now says he won’t quit. That’ll show ‘em! You go, Todd Akin!
UPDATE II: Akin spokesman Ryan Hite says to CNN: “On record: Akin is not dropping out of this race.”





49 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Dang it. If he stays in, I have to reconsider voting for McCaskill. I was planning to vote 3rd party as I am in the presidential race. However, if it is close, I may have to grit my teeth and vote for her solely to keep that neanderthal out of the Senate. Ugh.
Eh? Speaking for myself, I firmly support Akin staying in the race… so that his antidiluvean, sexist, authoritarian, anti-female views stay out there in the public spotlight. Time for these sleazy slimey bastards to be out in full view, rather than hiding under their various “rocks.”
Now let’s see RomneyRyan define ‘forcible’ Vs ‘non-forcible’ rape …
Yep, me too … especially now that he’s restated that he meant to say “forcible rape”.
Waving to Petro!! Hiya.
Yes, Akin just opens his mouth and inserts his other foot into it. I read somewhere that Mike Huckster tried to “rescue” Akin, but apparently Akin started babbling about 9/11, no less. WTF?
I think these HOONS (sigh, I haz a sad cuz the Aussies have all the good words, mate) should say it LOUD and stay out in the spotlight for all the world to see. If ya got it, flaunt it.
This is THE issue with Republicans, they play to win. Akin is no different.
I absolutely agree– it’s good to have a spotlight on his views, views that he shares with Ryan. I’m just hoping that polling shows a big enough swing for McCaskill that I don’t have to vote for her. As much as I don’t want to vote for her, however, I’ll do it to keep that repugnant man out of office.
To quote another con-man: “I feel your pain.” Good luck.
““The many people who supported me know that when you make a mistake what you need to do is say you’re sorry.””
No. What “you need to do” in order for it to be a meaningful apology is to do something to make it right. Otherwise, all you have to offer is so many useless words.
Akin’s only “sorry” that HE’s been busted on this. Otherwise, Akin’s not “sorry” for what he said because it’s clear that he said what he meant, and he meant what he said.
In all honesty, I’d some smidgeon of “respect” for Akin if he just “stood his ground” and said: this IS what I believe. Deal with it. No apologies.
At least that would be honest.
“Akin apparently doesn’t understand why people are upset. Yes, legitimate rape is an odious term, but so is “forcible rape,””
What Akins means is that there is legitimate and illigitimate rape. Both varieties are up to male authority figures to determine. Akins made no mistake. He said exactly what he meant. When asked for clarification, he reiterated his original statement with a synonym.
If he’s to resign, then now is the time to start the suggestion/rumor that RomneyRyan offered the position of being Secretary of HHS as an inducement to drop out of the Senate race now.
Indeed. If that is what Akins thinks, let him stick with it. Does he not have the courage of his convictions? Does he have so little faith that he fears his god not stand with him in the lion’s den? Let his ideas be put to the test in public. Instead he backs away, which should tell his supporters something about his convictions. But it also presents them with the possibility to once again external blame by faulting the “liberal” media and thus continue to avoid a true, public and popular test of their sociopathic, fear-addled, control addictions.
Absolutely. Give these god-bothering authoritarians every opportunity to express themselves in public. Let citizens hear exactly what they think and what they have in mind for everyone who isn’t them. Don’t shut up Akins and his ilk. Hand them a megaphone.
Akin is a dumbshit.
They’re all cowards, who do not have any courage of their convictions? Why? Because they’re all grifters and con-artists, who don’t really *believe* in what they’re saying, other than using “religion” as a means to suppress, oppress, dominate & control others. It’s not really about “faith.” And 99.99% of the time, it’s mainly about money.
They are all a-moral con-artist grifters out to make a buck offa foolish rubes who are easily parted with their money. Their authoritarian
rubesconstituents/flocks have been well-trained to accept this bc “Big Daddy” is telling them how to think & what to do.Akin may not be able to withstand the pressure from the PTB to drop out, but I would really like to see him stay in. His views would get even more publicity than they are getting now.
This is the one issue that makes the right wing but pro choice women in my family really uncomfortable about the Republicans, and where the divisive low Atwater road the Republicans set out on during the Reagan era really begins to haunt them. Aiken is out of touch with all but maybe 15% of the electorate, thank goodness–a frank embarrassment to even the Romneys of this world.
Nice to hear Obama plunging in the knife. Four tomorrow can’t come soon enough for Claire McCaskill.
That diagram is fantastic!
Akins makes no sense, medically or scientifically. But I have no idea what the President means when he says we should not be defining rape. That is what laws do. With college campuses at the forefront, rape has been redefined in the last thirty years to include instances that would not have been considered rape in the past, cases where the issue is one of consent, not force. This has been for the good.
I’d say the “not a quitter” blurb harkens back to Nixon (remember that guy?), but Akin makes Nixon look like Mother Teresa. It should make for some good comedy watching the party regulars (whatever that means these days) avoid him like he’s radioactive – which (basically) he is. On the other hand (and as if right on cue):
It’s almost like I’m shell-shocked; nothing seems to phase me anymore, although that’s certainly not a valid reason to throw in the towel.
Bingo. He’s a one-man jobs program for comics and satirists.
Nice. Begin rumor…Now!
X2
Bachmann, Perry and Santorum drop out, but……wait……here comes Akin!!!!!
Add me to the list of those who agree. I think you are far from speaking only for yourself here.
I am wondering if anyone is keeping an eye on rape statistics since the concept of “legitimate rape” is turned loose by the idiots. If it’s like what happens when the concept of “legitimate guns” gets turned loose, that needs to be included in the dialogue.
I am guessing that Akins may be addressing the notion that all the slutty pregnant women will claim they were raped just so that they can legally kill their babies. This whole argument takes the fathers completely out of the discussion.
I was not kidding when I said that we need to get in front of this issue. Arguing about raped or compliant pregnant women does NOT further this discussion. Every time we hear a discussion on abortion, we need to counter with financial responsibility!
If these religious freaks claim they are protecting babies, then we need to demand they protect these “innocent human lives” with their wallets! In every state where they are passing laws to limit access to abortion, we should introducing legislation to provide for the support of all these mens’ babies. Pass laws requiring every live birth to be DNA tested for paternity. To protect each woman’s right to privacy, remove ANY access to the child by the father, and garnish the wages of the fathers to provide for prenatal care, support, and housing. They will need to give child support until the child is 18. If they all fear a “honey pot” where the devious women get pregnant on purpose to gain child support, well then they can keep their penises in their pants. If women can figure out how to trick a man into sex, well then she gets unconditional financial support! Oh, they say, that isn’t fair to the innocent men? Well their rules are not fair to the innocent women, are they?
Why do we let this be a women’s “problem”?
If they want to “celebrate life” then we need to make them celebrate financial support!
This election IS NOT about Akin, or Ryan, or even Romney. It’s about one man and only one man, that man, *b. hussein obama. Try to divert, as you most certainly, must, but in the end, it will be to no avail. Sorry…..
*the worst president in American history. Making Rosalind Carter the happiest person in the country!
Let’s admit it, the democratic party has its loons. But nobody, NOBODY, can compete with the depth they have at the GOP. One bumbling idiot after another.
It’s remarkable.
There are legitmate reasons to discuss other other politicians.
I have to disagree that this isssue is solely about “diverting attention” from Obama. Not to be disrespectful, but that’s facile and simplistic.
What’s more remarkable is that they do, to an extent, truly represent the views of a somewhat significant portion of the citizenry.
X3 or more. Who is the artist? Can I get a T-Shirt? That would raise a bunch of money to send Kevin back to cover the Bradley Manning “trial.”
Akin isn’t a bug. He’s a feature.
Hate to throw water onto the passionate fires, but I smell another Wisconsin cooking here. So, McCaskill wants him to stay in because he is easier to beat than who? Ignorance? Violence? Hatred of Women? Really, isn’t that what we are discussing now?
McCaskill is a blue dog Democrat. She doesn’t deserve progressives support. It’s a wingnut versus a blue dog. Vote for an alternative, any alternative. If the Dems turn this into a natl issue, as some seem to want to (although who knows why Obama is playing it up), then they are doing it for the wrong reasons, and for a pyrrhic victory in that state at best. On the natl level it may get all the good Dems a bit upset but it does nothing to start a natl dialogue on sex and violence. Just like climate change, torture, and everything else, the main issue will become subordinate to party affiliation.
Vote third party. Voting and supporting a blue dog candidate just makes the situation worse. Like in Wisconsin, that strategy is a waste of time. If stupid people need to be educated about the violence of rape, a blue dog is not going to be of any help.
According to right wingers, there is a real scientific question involved here that merits research. If a woman’s body is shutting down during rape and preventing pregnancy, is her body reacting this way after sperm has penetrated an egg or before? The answer to this question will determine whether a witch burning policy is merited or not.
Oh yeah, I agree agree with that.
Yes, she may not be a favorite but this guy just can’t be allowed to win.
I’ve already got Roy Blunt for one of my senators. McCaskill may not be great, but she’s a damn sight better than Akin or anyone the MO GOP might replace him with if he backs out.
Don’t like McCaskill? Then run a primary challenge to her. Given that there was no movement in that direction, McCaskill is the one on the ballot against the GOP around here.
Voting third party will give Roy Blunt a GOP colleague, and that’s not something I find attractive at all. If a Blue Dog gives you the creeps, it’s nothing compared with twin rightwingers.
Is this guy married? Most of the GOP is. I’ll bet his wife is just sooooo proud.
How is it possible Akin leads in the polls?
She has to be proud. If she isn’t, Akin can return her to the manufacturer, Stepford Industries, Inc., for free repair or replacement.
Obama should talk. Didn’t he just overrule his female Secretary of HHS on the ‘Plan B’ “morning after’ pill citing his role as “father” to two daughters as a factor in his decision? OK, Akin is a complete screwball, but Obama isn’t above tossing woman’s rights over the side when he feels it suits him politically.
Obama isn’t above tossing woman’s rights over the side when he feels it suits him politically.
Tammany Tiger’s Law: The more loyal a constituency is to the Democratic Party, the greater the likelihood the party will betray it.
Eh? No argument from me. Obama will toss *anyone’s* rights under the bus, if he feels it’s politically expedient. I say that as one of the f*cking r*tarded “professional left,” who needs to be drug-tested.
Let’s face it: almost none of these professional politicians works for the 99%. They do what’s in the better interests of the 1%.
The traditional values ilk believe a husband can rape his wife .This is scripture .If one starts there ,it makes for easier comprehesion .except other fundamentalists wear berkas and whatnot to obviate the question of whether “”she was asking for it “” in legal matters .
I agree with tammany tiger’s law @43.
He’s an insect AND a feature.
During the three-way GOP primary, all of the candidates ran ads — millions of dollars worth — that claimed their two competitors were siblings of McCaskill. Add in another several million dollars worth of ads from Crossroads GPS and other GOP 529s, and it would drag anyone’s polling numbers down.
Other than running some Br’er Rabbit ads telling conservatives that Akin was “too conservative for Missouri” that were designed to assure they’d vote for him, Claire didn’t buy ads of her own and saved her money for the general election fight.
Thanks for planting my feet back in terra firma ADCetc. I actually got a bit of a rare lift from Obama’s comments this afternoon, but you’re right. . . In fact, playing the paternalistic role tends to be his stronger suit.