Here’s something for Michael “There’s been no short-term austerity” Grunwald to chew on: President Obama will extend the federal employee pay freeze into next year, meaning that federal employees will have seen their wages stagnate for at least two and a half years.
The freeze will stay in effect until a spending plan is passed, but the presidential election makes it unlikely that will happen before the start of fiscal 2013 on Oct. 1. As a result, the president is required by the end of August to come up with an “alternative pay plan” to avoid a legal trigger that would automatically raise federal pay in line with private-sector salaries. The alternative pay plan is usually a routine event signaling that Congress and the White House have agreed on a salary increase for federal workers.
With no budget, the freeze will stay in place until at least April, when a short-term spending deal that congressional leaders reached before their August recess to fund the government for six months runs out. The short-term agreement keeps spending at current levels and is silent on the federal pay freeze.
Austerity, by the way, should get looked at in real-dollar terms. A pay freeze, even if it means the same amount of outlays, is an austere policy because of inflation. If spending is staying constant, that’s a real-dollar cut. That we have a smaller federal workforce serving a greater population is an example of austerity. Spending has dropped from the time before President Obama entered office. We’re not talking about an artificial drop because of the stimulus, but a drop, and a bigger drop in real dollars, from the level at the end of the Bush Administration to now. And because of an artificial spending cap that the President touts in his speeches (“We’ve already cut $1 trillion”), that will continue, dropping to 22% of GDP from 25% by 2021.
Meanwhile, union leaders are pissed off that they have to continue to endure austerity measures while the rich get off scot-free, at least for the moment:
“The well is dry, Mr. President,” J. David Cox Sr., the newly elected president of the American Federation of Government Employees, said in an interview.
“This is a president who has said he wants to end the freeze,” Cox said. “It’s unconscionable.” AFGE is the largest federal employee union.
While pay has frozen for federal workers, their health care premiums have not, incidentally. So it’s a real cut in wages, by $2,000 for the employee averaging $30,000 per year in salary. Cox wants premiums frozen for 2013.
So the next time you hear someone say that the President has “outfoxed” Congress, and that the Administration hasn’t “turned the country into Spain,” don’t say it in front of a federal employee, who hasn’t had a raise since 2010.




12 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Thank you, David. Also noted recent employment figures had footnote re 9,000 federal employees cut. Of course, no mention of reducing the 70,000 info tech contractors that sift data and generate lists for “murder tuesdays” . . .
Ahh, a choice this election between your father’s Republican Party (Dole, Ford, Nixon)who will kill SS and Medicare slowly, and the current, bat-shit crazy incarnation who will kill them right freakin’now.
This is the culmination of decades of choosing the lesser of two evils.
Per Government Executive magazine, this is Obama in essence forcing Congress to make a decision on the budget. Here’s the lead graf:
Do you know why this is being done?
Because government workers’ pay is outpacing the people who don’t work for the government (especially benefits).
Wages have been being depressed in the private sector for the last 4 years. Severely depressed for millions.
Obama’s administration said that their stated goal is to make American workers competitive with the rest of the world.
Now you see what they mean. Bring all wages down. And they are working hard to do that.
The hell of it is, this was just a gift by Obama to the Republicans. When he asked for it, they hadn’t mentioned it. He just brought it up out of the blue. He did not ask for any Republican concession in return. He just did it.
Rahm called progressives “fucking retards.” Any so-called progressive or federal worker who votes for this Republican bastard proves him right.
Don’t vote Republican and don’t stay home. Vote for any progressive or Donald Duck. These DINOs need to know that there are millions of votes out there that are only available for Democrats! When the pool of identifiable progressive voters who refuse to vote for Obamaesque neocons is large enough – and only then – will we get progressive leadership.
And don’t sweat the Supreme Court. It is conservative now and it has been since Nixon – with most of the Taliban justices currently in power voted in with “progressive” votes. It will continue to be. Only when progressives dominate the confirmation process will we have a shot at a progressive court. Conservadems have been using that carrot to decieve us since the Nixon days.
Between now and then we may lose more rights and we may have to take it to the streets – whoever is president.
Are you in?
are you in the obama campaign bus? ready to throw more natural constituencies under the bus?
federal workers? > under the bus
home owners? > under the bus
labor? > under the bus
immigrants? > under the bus
environmentalists? > under the bus
teachers? > under the bus
state workers? > under the bus
minimum wage workers? > under the bus
whistle blowers? > under the bus
occupiers? > under the bus
the poor? > under the bus
the sick? > under the bus
Are you in, or are you under?
‘Between now and then we may lose more rights and we may have to take it to the streets…”
When, not if.
In what universe will the ownership class clap their hands to their foreheads, say “Gosh, we were wrong” and stand for equity?
I’ll tell ya, I am so mad about this I could spit nails.
This is to pay for the deficit caused by the Bush/Obama tax cuts. We have to tighten our belts – the landlord just raised our rent $50 a month, like he has for the last three years – so the rich can avoid a just share of taxes.
If we had had to trade this pay cut (that’s what it actually is) for an extension of unemployment benefits, food stamps for the new poor, or some other worthwhile program, it would still hurt, but we’d be willing to make the sacrifice. But this and the original freeze were part of no negotiation – and no Republican President would have dared do the same. Until now, that is. Obama has led the way.
I am soooo sorry I ever voted for this DINO bastard.
My wife, BTW supports me, our son, and herself on her federal salary.
Their distain for workers nows no bounds. And they’re supposed to be the party of the “not rich.”
UnEasyOne, that’s the kind of thing that we the people in the D column have always been willing to do – help each other get through these tough times – and we know the cost of the willingness to sacrafice, and still, we are willing. But this travesty, this current fever for austerity is solely for the puprose of protecting the unjust enrichment of the already rich, and that the President, the head of what once was our party, is a willing and all too able partner is . . . well there’s just no words.
I echo your sentiments, and give your wife a hug and kiss for me.
Gladly, Laura. She’s my hero.
I have been hospitalized 5 times since November. She has continued to work, to take care of our son, perform truly disgusting nursing services for me and generally keep the home fires burning while I was incapacitated. She’s an amazing woman.
Yes, fool me once, shame on you, and I voted for him too. Never EVER again.
I would NOT vote for him even if I lived in a contested state, but what flummoxes me is the MANY people who are gonna vote for him when their state will surely go for Romney anyhow. WHY!!!
Damifino. I live in Texas too. And I’m starting to think I owe Hillary an apology.