The Republican National Convention has been gaveled into order, and an already-hoarse RNC Chair Reince Priebus has begun the proceedings. The first day will include the roll call to formally nominate Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan for President and Vice President. What may have been an uncomfortable floor fight over the seating of delegates appears to have been averted, with a deal between Mitt Romney and the Texas delegation (LATE UPDATE: or perhaps not).
Also, in a couple hours’ time, the RNC will formally adopt the party platform. Republicans aren’t really interested in having anyone read that platform, but it offers plenty of clues into the policy trends of one of the major parties in America. We’ve heard about the abortion plank, calling for a ban on the procedure with no exceptions. There are planks that support African nations that persecute members of the LGBT community, planks supporting the establishment of a commission to study the return of the US to the gold standard, planks that draw a red line on Iran’s nuclear program at a weapon “capability” instead of a weapon itself, even planks recommitting to a forceful prosecution of pornography.
But perhaps the most important plank in the platform, considering the prominence of the nation’s fiscal debate, is the plank on Medicare, which spells out quite directly the GOP plan for the future of the program.
The text details the privatization policy that GOP lawmakers have supported for years, and that Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan are selling as necessary to “save” Medicare. But in an unusual twist, it addresses the specific aspect of the proposal that makes it a departure from what Americans know as “Medicare.”
“The first step is to move the two programs [Medicare and Medicaid] away from their current unsustainable defined-benefit entitlement model to a fiscally sound defined-contribution model,” the draft platform reads. “While retaining the option of traditional Medicare in competition with private plans, we call for a transition to a premium-support model for Medicare, with an income-adjusted contribution toward a health plan of the enrollee’s choice. This model will include private health insurance plans that provide catastrophic protection, to ensure the continuation of doctor-patient relationships.”
The platform will also reportedly support increasing the Medicare eligibility age.
Fact-checking organizations who have mistakenly called the proposition that Republicans would “end Medicare as we know it” a lie must pay attention to that paragraph. Simply put, Republicans want to, well, end Medicare as we know it, from a defined benefit, a government-run insurance program for all seniors, which pays medical bills like any other insurance program, to a defined contribution, where seniors instead get a coupon to purchase their own insurance on the private market but the contribution likely won’t keep up with rising costs and premiums. The menu of options may include a government-run alternative, but it too would be a defined contribution rather than a defined benefit.
Republicans call the defined benefit plan unsustainable. But private competition, which is the method that they prefer for lowering costs, has never worked to do so in any test you can muster. Medicare is far better at containing costs on health care in the United States than private insurance. Every advanced country in the world, with their more coherent and less fragmented health care system, has lower costs than this country. The only thing a premium support plan would do is to offload those higher costs onto individuals as the higher costs exceed the “defined contribution.” In the name of keeping providers fat and happy with higher reimbursements, Republicans would throw seniors into the vicissitudes of the marketplace, which has not worked for individuals.
Let’s not overlook the part of that language that supports the block-granting of Medicaid, which would make massive cuts, shoulder costs onto beneficiaries, and lower the enrollment of the program.
The final platform language will not be made public until after the vote, a sign that Republicans don’t really want anyone to know about it. But these are basically the programs for Medicare that Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan have supported.




26 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
I believe a good way to attack this (as well as some of Romney’s positions on expenditure goals by GDP, like increasing the defense expenditure to 4% of GDP, wwhether needed or not) and Ryan’s “Path To Prosperity” (Uh, Whose Prosperity?) would be to remind people what are the goals of our NATIONAL GOVERNMENT, set forth by its Constitution’s Premable. After all, conservatives are supposed to revere the Constitution.
“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”
Many Americans understand how Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, SSDI, TANF EBT food aid contribute to these goals. Republicans should be challenged to explain how cutting expenses on these programs now is more effective or necessary in furthering these goals than maintaining or increasing them. If one gets the tired old khrap about money scarcity and Deficits of Mass Destruction, make them deal with the fact that the Federal Reserve created by keystrokes only and without inflation, (depending on how you count, $7.7 Trillion in low intgerest loans to the banks, [Bloomberg] or $$16.1 trillion [GAO Report 11-696] or $29 trillion [by count of Levy Institute, Bard College]
Gee, John Stossel says that privatization beats government every time–and he backs it up with facts. Of course, I have no idea what his source is for his facts, but that doesn’t matter.
Trouble is, the latest poll is showing that more people trust Romney-Ryan to take care of Medicare. Apparently, the claims that Obama stole over $700 billion from Medicare to pay for Obamacare are doing damage.
So far, I have not seen any ad rebutting those claims.
the american people are either to racist or to dumb to care.
why do you think polls show about an even split when asked of people over 65 who is better for medicare obama or romney?
the reason?
that age group is proportionally the largest % of racists AND it also is the age group most likely to get their information only from fox news.
without the MSM telling the truth the vast majority of people have little idea what is really going on.
and of course romney and ryan could never threaten the election if the media (the press) did their job.
Perhpas rebutting those claims is too partisan for Mr. Obama, and rebutting them might upset the Republicans, who he really wants to
roll over fordo business with if he’s re-elected.What all these different wacky ideas mean is that Mitt has had to make many many deals to gain the support of different GOP groups. Normally the President is the leader of his party and Everything in the Paryt’s platform is something he is running on and will support in his campaign.
Sure Obama lied about supporting many things in his platform but Mitt is not even waiting until his convention is over to say his platform does not matter.
I assume the GOP hard liners are just like the Left’s hard liners and I know I would not have worked as hard for Obama as I did if I knew then what I know now.
I think the GOP’s machine of local fundies is not going to put much effort into getting the vote out.
The GOP’s machine is strongest in the Red States so I think we will see some surprises in the Red States.
Good, Medicare as We Know It is unsustainable.
I can guarantee you that the Obama team has a whole bunch of Willard and Ryan will destroy Medicare as we know it ads set for Florida. The question becomes whether those old geezers, who voted for a criminal like Scott, are going to let themselves be punked a second time. The security of their heathcare trumps any bigotry that they have.
Here is the other side to the argument with facts.
http://my.firedoglake.com/thingscomeundone/2011/11/01/question-all-assumptions/
More facts here
http://my.firedoglake.com/thingscomeundone/2011/11/02/question-all-assumptions-2/
One difference: The Left hardliners won’t be writing the platform at the Dem convention.
http://my.firedoglake.com/thingscomeundone/2011/11/02/question-all-assumptions-2/
I’m unemployed if Obama needs a speech writer and if he ever gets the Stones to fight back against the GOP.
So thats another job I won’t get:(
We need to stree the GOP plan is worse than Obama’s and we need to stress that National Healthcare is a better fix than the Obama plan.
To do that we need Real Lefties in the media.
As long as the GOP controls the Media voters cannot be faulted for making bad choices based on bad data garbage in garbage out.
We need people like Jane talking about these topics on supposedly liberal shows like Rachel Maddow and the Daily Show.
here is the short and sweet of it; both parties suck and are bought off. need I say more!?
Revolution is coming Because things are falling apart and the Center has come Undone)
Most voters don’t watch these cable shows. They are hooked to the network sitcoms and Leno and Letterman late at night. To even think that there are going to be “real lefties” in the media is a pipe dream. As long as big corporations control the disemination of information we will have the same old crap.
When a rich person goes to the doctor a poor person should go with them and when they are in the bathroom answer to the name of the person called.
If we did this a few million times across the country maybe we could get a little medical care.
Only that we aren’t going to take it anymore.
Rancid Pubis and his Idiot Chorus of Fools want to give every unfortunate and elderly American a barbbed-wire enema.
Like moving from defined-benefit pensions to defined-contribution IRAs and 401(k)’s.
And it sounds like this would apply to seniors currently eligible for Medicare as well.
Sooo…the more your payroll taxes the greater your benefit up to some maximum. What could be the problem with that?
“The Great Capitulator”…….I don’t think “stones” are on his shopping list. He’s gonna get another four years. Not on his record, but because the republicans are running two of the craziest SOB’s I’ve seen in a long time. The democrats are perfectly comfortable with their strategy, “We suck less.”
The 99% is becoming more and more discouraged with both parties. I do think things will change. And soon. Lotta people really pissed off.
I think Medicare is done-for, no matter who “wins.” What difference does it make?? The US populace is asleep at the wheel. The only segment who is willing to “fight” are the racists, whose fires are stoked 24/7/365 by the propoganda wurlitzer.
Obama’s not going to “fight” the so-called “Republicans” on this because he’s just taking notes on how to do it, himself, should the 1% decide that Obama gets to “win” this go-round.
Saw Ann Romney on TV tday crying a bit bc she said at the end of the day her illness, MS, makes her feel as though she has no “reserve tank” of energy. I wonder how others-with less and lower taxed income feel. And, how will thousands with MS do if or when Medicare is scratched?
Just keep building and proping-up other nations and keep the wars going and add a third one bc Israel does not want Iran to have the same capabilities that they-Israel-already have. Will the coffer-draining fake BS “wars” be addressed at the Gopher convenion?
???
The whole point is not to keep up, that is how it is supposed to save money.
That is a moot point.
Health care cost increases are unsustainable and will crash the economy before Medicare blows up the budget.
Not true. Medicare is out of (fund) money in 12 years. Anti-Republicans thought they had a hook line when they devised “End of Medicare as We Know It”.
If Dems want to keep “Medicare as We Know It”, they run it broke.
Better to find a way to change it.
If you want to take a bunch of money from rich people and fund Medicare, that’s fine, but it will also be “Ending Medicare as We Know It”.
Arguing otherwise is a big fat Hypo.