It’s hard not to get blinded by the searing light of Bill Clinton. But Elizabeth Warren gave the speech that spoke more to me last night. Strip away the reason all these speeches are happening – support for the President – and the stories that Warren and Clinton told were a little different. Clinton told a story of Democratic policy ideas building a foundation for growth, and creating opportunity, and bringing back shared prosperity. He added an important moral component that “poverty, discrimination and ignorance restrict growth.”
Warren told the truth. “The game is rigged,” she said, and then she explained how.
I’m here tonight to talk about hard-working people: people who get up early, stay up late, cook dinner and help out with homework; people who can be counted on to help their kids, their parents, their neighbors, and the lady down the street whose car broke down; people who work their hearts out but are up against a hard truth—the game is rigged against them [...]
The system is rigged. Look around. Oil companies guzzle down billions in subsidies. Billionaires pay lower tax rates than their secretaries. Wall Street CEOs—the same ones who wrecked our economy and destroyed millions of jobs—still strut around Congress, no shame, demanding favors, and acting like we should thank them.
Anyone here have a problem with that? Well I do.I talk to small business owners all across Massachusetts. Not one of them—not one—made big bucks from the risky Wall Street bets that brought down our economy. I talk to nurses and programmers, salespeople and firefighters—people who bust their tails every day. Not one of them—not one—stashes their money in the Cayman Islands to avoid paying their fair share of taxes.
These folks don’t resent that someone else makes more money. We’re Americans. We celebrate success. We just don’t want the game to be rigged.
It’s as if Bob Rubin got rhetorically thrown in the pool, along with actually falling in one at a fancy donor event.
That’s simply a far more honest portrayal of the America we actually live in than anyone usually articulates on stage at a national political convention. She told the story in broad strokes, the story people feel in their core, the story that anyone paying attention since the Great Recession knows. We’re not a fairy-tale land where everyone can grow up and be whatever they want. We’re not a land of social mobility and equality of opportunity. We’re in an economy that’s unraveled pretty badly, and over a 30-year period, that has cut off those avenues for mobility, and now has become a favor factory for the rich and powerful. People may not want to hear this; but they know it.
Where Warren and Clinton connect is over this passage, criticizing conservative ideology. But Warren took it a step further:
The Republican vision is clear: “I’ve got mine, the rest of you are on your own.” Republicans say they don’t believe in government. Sure they do. They believe in government to help themselves and their powerful friends.
This is an under-emphasized point. I hear liberals all the time ask the question, “Republicans say they hate government, and then they want to run it!” Of course they want to run government. Government can be extremely rewarding – when it’s used to particular ends to enrich friends and donors and corporate contributors. Government can be a profit-taking exercise. And that’s what usually happens.
Warren has a deeper record on rolling back this system of rigged government, simply by being the intellectual force and one-woman lobbyist behind the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau – than most people in government today. She told the story of the CFPB’s first enforcement action, how they got a full refund from Capital One for customers abused by add-on credit card fees, plus interest. The CFPB is doing astonishingly good work, considering its position as a federal agency. Warren gave Obama a lot of credit for that, and it’s his convention. But she ought to take a lot of that credit too.
The prescriptions for how to end the rigged game were a little too rooted to the same melange we often see as Democratic promises. But the line “anyone who works hard can build some security and raise a family” struck me. It was refreshingly honest because it didn’t ask for much. That’s not an outsized vision of Walter Mitty America. Just a chance for every hardworking individual out there to have a little comfort, a little pride.
The speech gave what few speeches at these types of things give – honesty. I’m not foolish enough to believe that one person can overcome a game that’s been rigged for many, many years. But I can’t think of a lot of people I’d rather want fighting to un-rig it than Elizabeth Warren.




69 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Unfortunately, Warren the war hawk will be too busy “fighting” for more belligerence against Iran to accomplish a damn thing about the banks. She’ll be trotted out to represent the populist lies the Democratic Party thrives on, while behind the scene what will she be doing? – raising money for the DNC.
And despite her rhetoric (which accomplished a small (text) bit of good against the Credit Card industry) she ain’t gonna do a damn thing against the real problem there, usury.
meh
She also deserves thanks for supporting, even fostering, the Occupy movement.
Her hard work there focuses on what’s been going wrong at the expense of the 99%, for the benefit of just the 1%.
She’ll bring the Mass delegation back where it belongs.
I am a huge fan of E. Warren but last night was she was staid and lacked enthusiasm. Further, she has developed a nervous habit of sticking her tongue in her cheek and lower lip. Very distracting. She can and has in the past done better. It seems as though she lost her touch and was no longer speaking to the middle.
The same for Clinton and others. Many of the Metaphors felt hollow.
We can do better.
warren for president!
Shorter DDay: We’re fucked!
Well, I have to say I enjoyed Mikulski and Pelosi the most. They are more comfy in their aura than Warren perhaps, but consider how long they have been doing this.
Still, I think Warren was tailoring her presentation, speaking largely to her prospective constituents here in Mass. Nowadays there are a lot of folks here who think they are “non-partisans” even though they are not. That is, they want the look and feel of politics here to at least appear more thoughtful, less mechanical, than before. I think Warren tipped her hat somewhat that way, and it will benefit her.
In 2008, we had the best chance of at least beginning to un-rig the game as we will in our lifetimes. The game is MORE rigged now that in 2008.
NO progress has been made in un-rigging the game. THAT’S honest.
The rest is pure bullshit.
On edit: Ask yourself: Is the game more rigged now or in 2008?
Wha?
Telling the truth is fatal in politics. The public can’t handle the truth. See Walter Mondale.
I noticed the tongue thing, but thought it was kind of cute.
This was the first time I had seen her speak, and what stood out was her sighing. It’s a bad habit and comes across as you getting dressed down by an elementary school teacher who is Oh So Disappointed In You. The words are good, sometimes very good, but the delivery is sub-par.
I’m surprised and uncomfortable that her race is as close as it is, though I expect she will win narrowly.
Great bumper sticker:
With an income between $600,000 and $1M a year, I suspect she knows a little something about the 1%.
Fluke was my favorite.
I hope Obama doesn’t throw us womens under the bus, but I have no confidence he won’t after putting GAWD and Israel in the fuckin’ plank
Elizabeth Warren speech was great!
You have to clap for those on the front lines.
Elizabeth Warren is probably the only reason CFPB got created.
Elizabeth Warren is doing more, than a lot of others to help average americans.
are you saying that FDR, JFK, were conservatives because they were Rich? I don’t think so!
Keep in mind, a lot of wealthy people have done a lot to help common americans
Every rich person is not a KOCH head!
Elizabeth Warren is more JFK, than Mitt Romney
“I hope Obama doesn’t throw us womens under the bus”
You mean, other than his ban on over-the-counter sale of Plan B and the abortion restrictions he personally put into the Affordable Care Act, right?
“The game is rigged.” Repeated over and over for emphasis. What a wonderfully honest statement from a national politician. You haven’t heard that from Obama, the Clintons, Pelosi, or any other politician of national stature.
Heh. Beat me to it…
I noticed some body language early in her campaign which needed work. It was too stiff. Also the overhead lighting was awful on camera a few times — made her look like Darth Vader.
I think a lot of that has improved, but the window dressing really wasn’t prepped early on. The sighing may be due to honest exasperation, but yes it can be distracting.
It’s a horserace. Even irrelevant, peripheral stuff will be important factors.
“Unfortunately, Warren the war hawk will be too busy “fighting” for more belligerence against Iran to accomplish a damn thing about the banks.”
Exactly. Between bombing Iran and breaking up big banks, I wonder which policy she will find more support for in the Obama administration?
This whole ‘the game is rigged’ thing?
Harry Reid said it a few days ago. Should we all be Harry Reid fans now?
Hahaha!
Probably nervous…I sure would be.
This is a rough crowd
See here.
E. Warren wasn’t making a brave and honest stand against the system. She was repeating one of the convention talking points.
On edit – and now that everyone is covering ‘the game is rigged’ with such a giant chubby, Obama will work it into his remarks as well.
Welcome back to 2008. We apologize for the 4 year delay. We were experiencing technocratic difficulties. We now return you to our message of Hope and Change.
Yep. A three-day infomercial is still and infomercial. Even down to the phony platform adoption and phony roll-call of the states (did you total up the votes or notice that Madame Secretary seemed a little looped).
What we should do instead of being fans is have a little sense that the rhetoric of the protesters outside the walls is effective enough that the rhetoric is ripe for co-option. And celebrate that very minor victory.
I’m not big on the halo effect that comes with responding to politicians like fans or like the opposing sports team. Details matter. Strategy matters. The big job is changing the phony political culture.
Well, I don’t think income or accumulated wealth, alone, is necessarily a disqualifier from the progressive cause. It’s certainly not in Mass or the other bluest states. Even some here who were born wealthy (Ted K & Co) were progressives in their day.
There are a lot of people who, by the numbers, one from afar would expect to be corporatist right wingers. Sometimes it turns out not to be the case, though, and we need to judge by what they do.
Warren is certainly ambitious, and has done well by it. But she also has roots elsewhere and grew up in less favorable circumstances. Pretty well rounded, I’d say.
TODAY’S REPUBLICANS ARE AMERICA’S ENEMY WITHIN
Republicans ARE practicing seditious DEMAGOGUERY and anti-democracy OBSTRUCTIONISM intended to destabilize our economy for purposes of political exploitation.
Republicans AREN’T making a sincere effort to STOP the bleeding THEIR incompetent leadership and failed policies created. Instead, they’re using inflammatory lies and accusations as a smokescreen to conceal their subversive agenda, which is to cause President Obama and America to fail so they can blame Democrats for the consequences of THEIR calamitous mismanagement.
Republicans ARE preposterously professing that THEIR disgraceful political WHORING had nothing to do with the banking, real estate, stock market and employment catastrophes that resulted.
Republicans ARE trying to hamstring Democrats to prevent them from repairing the damage caused during a Republican presidency that was irresponsibly enabled by Republican Senators and Representatives.
Republicans ARE offering ridiculous arguments meant solely to disrupt and prevent progressive change. They’d rather divide America and create political gridlock than endure the political consequences of effective Democratic governance.
Republicans AREN’T the LOYAL OPPOSITION; they ARE the ENEMY WITHIN whose mercenary priorities have eroded their moral and ethical standards to the point that duplicity and betrayal have become their preferred modus operandi.
It’s one thing to advocate their conservative beliefs; it’s another thing entirely to willfully sabotage America’s government because a successful Democratic presidency would not be vulnerable to the greed, fears and hatreds that have produced and sustained the despicable Republican anti-government corporatism and anti-Christian faux theocracies that are poisoning and crippling American society.
I hope he does. That opens the folks outside to start making the argument, “Well stop rigging it.”
Occupy Chicago has been doing some good stuff at Obama headquarters (the Pru in Chicago) this week. A funeral for Hope and Change (putatively killed by a drone prop) opposing the drone war. And a prop of a house with a ball and chain (for all the underwater mortgages) for the failure to deal with the housing crisis. On separate days.
TODAY’S REPUBLICANISM…..IS THE VICTORY OF THE “ID” OVER THE “SUPER EGO”
Today’s Republicans don’t believe that intelligence, logic, compassion or an appreciation or acknowledgment of historical facts or legal precedents are required, relevant or worthy of consideration.
Driving jobs out of America and Americans out of their homes is “just business” to them; nothing “personal”.
Corporations should be given the same first amendment free speech rights as individual citizens so they can “buy” political candidates and elections, despite the fact that works against the best interests of working class Americans and further diminishes their political relevance/influence.
Pollution, global warming and deforestation are all improvable “myths” of egg-head/tree-hugger scientists who are “socialist” enemies of “over-regulated” capitalism. The earth, which right wing fundamentalist claim is less than 6,000 years old, will miraculously heal itself! All we have to do is “pray”.
For today’s mercenary self-focused deviant breed of dysfunctional near-sighted Republicans, it’s not about right or wrong, good or bad, fair or unfair, rational or irrational…..it’s about power and control, even if that means intellectual, moral, psychological and functional delusion, denial and dishonesty. They want what they want for no other reason than they WANT it……regardless of the consequences to themselves and everyone else! Somehow, that makes “them” feel good about themselves…..makes them “feel” safe.
Well said TD. I agree wholeheartedly.
And I hadn’t yet spotted that small victory, that the OWS message has permeated the nation discourse. It’s being abused, yes, but at least it’s there.
I had to bug out after about a minute when she called that horrific warmongering shrew Hillary “one of the coolest women on the planet.”
Is she going to win?
the last time I checked 1% of the USA population controls 90% or more of USA wealth?
at the end of the day they always win and they always have won.
this is why I don’t beat up people like Elizabeth Warren
Elizabeth Warren at least tries to fight the good fight
who tells the CIA what to do?
until someone gets these CIA nuts under control, we will be fighting wars
If money talks and we all say Money screams.
The Department of Defense budget does not just scream it yells
The USA govt. was hijack a long time ago
Yup.
Remember, a lot of people figured that the institutional Dem backing of her candidacy was just a sop to the Democratic base, much as allowing Dean the DNC Chair job was supposed to be just a sop. Neither Warren nor Dean were supposed to actually be able to do anything — especially anything that might affect the established order.
But then Dean came up with and implemented the Fifty-State Strategy that worked beautifully in 2006 and 2008 and which hasn’t been totally destroyed despite Rahm Emanuel’s worst efforts before being anointed King of Chicago.
Warren wasn’t supposed to do well againist Scott Brown, much less have a better than 50% chance of winning. Yet here she is.
Your numbers are off but I get the point.
It doesn’t matter if she’s a do-gooder, she’s a 1%er.
She might be a 1%er, but she’s our 1%er. Rah rah.
Got proof?
I stand corrected (sigh).
She’s a lone voice in the wilderness. Kudos to her for trying to fight the good fight. Too bad AIPAC got their claws into her early.
What part needs proof?
We are the 99% is a political slogan widely used by the Occupy movement. It was originally the name of a Tumblr blog page launched in late August 2011 by a 28-year-old New York activist going by the name of “Chris”. It is a variation on the phrase “We The 99%” from an August 2011 flyer for the NYC General Assembly. The phrase indirectly refers to the concentration of income and wealth among the top earning 1%, and reflects a belief that the “99%” are paying the price for the mistakes of a tiny minority. The phrase was picked up as a unifying slogan by the Occupy movement.
According to the Wall Street Journal, as of October 2011, the lower 99% of income distribution in the United States is made up of those earning less than $506,000 annually.
In 2011, the Harvard Law School professor and her husband’s household income was $616,181.
That year’s income was down from the previous three years, where they brought in more than $800,000 annually.
She is the 1% – not that there’s anything wrong with that, unless you think there is.
The content of the speech was very good. Unfortunately the delivery was very poor.
She constantly continued to speak right through applause – as if the crowd wasn’t even there.
She has to learn that speeches are not lectures. They are a two way conversation between the speaker and the audience.
Her speech was delivered like a lecture.
It’s not enough to tell the truth. It’s also HOW you tell the truth. That’s the way the world works.
Too bad – I really admire her.
Alone with Harry Reid.
*sigh*
Too soon to say.
There is to be a debate, but I don ‘t know when.
There was a kerfuffle over the proposed debate being in a Kennedy-controlled venue in Boston, K-Center I think. Brown asked one of the Ks in charge (I don’t recall which, there are so many) to not make an endorsement if he (Brown) were to agree to debate there. That issue was a month or more ago. Haven’t heard more since.
Brown should be more concerned with who the questioners are than with where the chairs are.
keep in mind Elizabeth Warren only had 12 min to give this speech.
Elizabeth Warren being in Prime Time; 10:00 to 11:00, this is when the networks carry the convention and with Clinton coming up next, she did not have time to stop and pause.
Clinton is Clinton, being a former president, you can ignore all the rules.
Elizabeth Warren done a great job given the circumstances.
I heard last night she is five point behind. I hope she can close that gap.
Yes, it is all an infomercial designed to rally the base. Still I enjoyed Fluke, Warren and Clinton. So it worked for me
I agree with that.
I was both inspired and profoundly saddened by Warren’s speech. Inspired because she’s the one the Democrats should be running for President. Saddened because they’re too corrupt to ever do so.
Income is a very small portion of the calculation(particularly since many at the top technically don’t even labor for a living). Unless you have her net worth I think I’ll restrain myself from slinging the term 1% at her.
It’s hard to believe her family(less than a million) in the same category as a guy who makes 20 million and collects $100,000 paydays after “he’s retired” for essentially doing nothing.
I’d love to attend a meet and Greet with Romney and ask him where I can get in on the ground floor/entry position of a gig where I make 6 figures for doing nothing. It doesn’t seem it would take much skill to be involved in no decision making whatsoever.
Come on Blue she is the perfect pick for 2116, she will promise to save you five bucks on your credit card bill and bomb the hell out the Persians.
Well said.
I heard Warren on the radio in my car–so no visuals to distract from her powerful message.
I heard the sighs, but they seemed appropriate to the subject matter–combatting a fixed system.
Speaking of combatting a fixed system, I wish that Elizabeth Warren become familiar with and read aloud the writings of our late Mary (from both FDL and emptywheel). Here’s a posting Mary wrote in 2010 on the anniversary of 9/11:
http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2010/09/11/a-way-towards-the-rule-of-law-–-an-answer-to-cap’n-jack/
Mary is demanding decency and a return to the rule of law on the part of our Executive branch. Written in response to Jack Goldsmith’s defense of the US’s terrorist detention policy, it nevertheless remains timeless– an antidote to the post-9/11 “whatever it takes” attitude that has been poisoning the minds of our leaders and their underlings.
Elizabeth Warren taught contract law at Harvard. Elizabeth Warren is well equipped to talk about a social contract, as well. Mary can unwaveringly point Elizabeth in the right direction.
there are rare 1%ers who embody 99%er values. It seems to me that Warren is pretty close.
Geeze you guys!
I was blown away by Elizabeth Warren! She was sincere, and inspiring, the only one up there even close to believing that a fighting chance for the middle class and poor, is worth fighting for. I thought she was the best speaker by FAR!
As a 54 year old business woman, I grew up without a single woman to look up to. Women’s studies did not exist for me, and I was in uncharted territory. To me she is beautiful, poised, powerful and feminine. Young people today can watch her speech, and see how an average american can grow into greatness.
So why are people critiquing her body language as though she is a pageant contender?
Unless they’re in Iran…
Don’t have her net worth, but recient income =
2008 —- $831,021.00
2009 —- $980,721.00
2010 —- $954,721.00
2011 —- $616,181.00
Unless her “expenses” are way up there I’d say 1%er range.
You’re pointing out the whole farce of the 99%. It’s not really the 1% they’re against. They’re against those who they don’t like and wrap themselves up in a big cover of “We’re the 99%”. But then make exceptions for all the 1%ers who aren’t in the group of people they don’t like.
You don’t get nearly as much cover if you admit “We’re the 3% somewhere in the middle that complain about the portion of the 1% that we don’t like”.
Well put!
Jedi, The CIA is the private army of the ruling class. They are also run at top positions by the ruling class…all the way back to Alan Dulles and GHW Bush, the latter of which was a secret agent right out of Skull & Bones, long before Nixon picked him to keep the lid from blowing off the big game back in Watergate/Dallas days.
I don’t know whether you will turn out to be right or not but you might consider changing tactics. I had a wife once who constantly did that kind of “You’re not going to do this, you’re never going to do that, you’ll always be this way or not that way.”
Couldn’t wait to get rid of that bitch, never mind listen to the merits of her point, if she ever had one.
She gave a very good speech. But if she gets into the Senate she’ll be a junior Democratic Senator, and subject to the Senate rules and customs that prevent first-term Senators from doing, well, much of anything. She’ll be another Democratic vote, and a small influence, that’s all. In the long term she may make a difference, but only in the long term.
She’s also made a bargain with the devil in her support of a war with Iran.
Of course the game is rigged, but if Warren is lucky, the farthest she will ever go is to be in the Senate where she will be absorbed and tolerated as just another voice in the wilderness, much like Bernie Sanders. The ones that do the rigging control the media. No matter how ubiquitous social networking becomes, any pol who is a true change agent ultimately is co-opted. That is how the oligarchy rules. The good cop (Dems) play off the bad cop (GOP) where the peasants are given just enough crumbs so they don’t become too restless. Sorry to say, but OWS was just an aberration – a blip on the radar.
interesting, i am 64 and have paid attention to federal politics since i first voted for mcgovern…i did not find the words to be hollow, i found them to be sincere and hopeful..ty
so, what is your point then tex? is it that she should talk and act like some other greedy person, and if she does not then she is full of it?
if that is your point i do not concur friend…ty
good, i hope she does, i don’t judge her or others by the amount of money they have, more what they do…..ty
What is the matter with MA that they support a tool like Scott Brown?
No, what I’m saying is I’d like to examine the evidence before I call her a member of the 1%. I’m saying that household that makes under a million does not appear to be in the same class as someone like Romney or Dimon.
Romney in addition to his multimillion dollar paycheck has 5 homes. Dimon pulled home 55 million in compensation in 2008. His compensation in 2011 was 23 million. Kinda makes the Warren household look like paupers in comparison.
Until I see net worth, I’m not gonna assume that Warren is in the same tax bracket as these guys, even if her salary is extremely high six figure.
–which is why I’m disappointed that Elizabeth Warren didn’t first try her hand at banking.
With her clean image, her bank brand would be unassailable. Flight of money from Wall St banks to a sane and balanced playing field Warren Bank would create more of a shift in the way Wall Street runs than any Senate seat win.
If Warren were to run her bank the way she states banks should be run (and presumably the way her CFPA creation plans to enforce), then to her bank could have flocked millions of middle class Americans with their savings. Americans tired of the Wall Street way of doing things could vote with their feet and bank books.
Her bank could also issue credit cards at fair rates and easy to understand fees. The Warren Bank could help to wipe out the usury rates of competing banks’ credit cards.
Her bank could register mortgage deeds at the local Registry of Deeds in each town, pay the fees to the towns (instead of MERS) and thereby help fund middle America’s town/city infrastructure the way the registration fees have always done.
Etc., etc.
Big banks, in response to middle class America’s flight to the Warren Bank, would need to play fair and square.
In the meantime, Warren could have had access to her bank’s profits that would allow her to pick the true Progressives to support for positions of power in DC. Big win for her and big win for 99% of the country.
If Warren does not win the Senate seat, maybe she’ll try my suggestion.
and Warren cannot start her bank too soon. Other banks are already putting their money on politicians they want in DC:
Per David Dayen’s current post:
http://news.firedoglake.com/2012/09/06/american-bankers-association-creates-slush-fund-for-secret-campaign-spending/
The debate is Thurs night 9/20 on WBZ Ch 4 in Boston. Last night they were saying it would be in the WBZ studio, which means not at the Kennedy after all. I assume there’s only one debate — that’s all that was reported.