The Chicago Teachers Union (CTU) commenced their first education strike in a generation last ight, with 29,000 teachers and school personnel walking out and taking up picket lines.
“Rahm says cut back, we say fight back,” picketers dressed in red T-shirts chanted this morning outside Chicago Public Schools headquarters.
Chicago Teachers Union President Karen Lewis announced late Sunday night that weekend talks had failed to resolve all the union’s issues. “We have failed to reach an agreement that will prevent a labor strike,” she said. “No CTU members will be inside of our schools Monday.”
After an all-day negotiating session Sunday, school board President David Vitale told reporters the district had changed its proposal 20 times over the course of talks and didn’t have much more to offer.
“This is about as much as we can do,” Vitale said. “There is only so much money in the system.”
For those of us catching up to this story, PCCC has a backgrounder. The union has outstanding issues over what they describe as compensation, jobs security and resources. The Chicago Public Schools (CPS), the lead negotiators with teachers, agreed to a four percent raise back in 2011, but Mayor Rahm Emanuel (who hand-picked the board) canceled it to close a budget deficit. CPS claims to have restored the 4% annual raise over the four-year contract, but they also want longer school days (meaning the same pay for more hours), and they rejected a proposal from the CTU that would have capped class sizes. CTU President Karen Lewis said the two sides are not far apart on compensation, but they want to maintain existing health benefits, whereas CPS wants to slash them.
There are also issues with a set of education reform measures that Mayor Emanuel wants to install in this contract. The teacher evaluation piece, based heavily on student test scores, could lead to the firing of 6,000 teachers within a year of implementation. In addition, Emanuel is seeking to take some money from the public school system to devote to charter schools. Finally:
Powerful Outside Interests Worked With Rahm To Cripple CTU’s Ability To Strike (They Failed): Last year, outside groups education privatization groups like Stand for Children worked with the city council and mayor to raise the strike threshold limit to 75 percent — meaning that 3/4 of teachers had to vote to strike. Jonah Edelman, who works for the group, bragged during the Aspen Ideas Festival that they had essentially eliminated teachers’ ability to strike. But in June, nearly 90 percent of CTU members voted to authorize a strike, easily surpassing the barrier that the city and education privatization groups had placed on them. But outside groups haven’t stopped taking aim at union rights. They’ve even paid protesters to demonstrate against CTU.
Chicago Public Schools has opened 144 of its schools (there are about 675 public schools in the city) for a half-day as part of a contingency plan, but will urge their parents to keep the students out (they’re basically open as glorified day care centers, with free breakfasts and lunches and independent reading or writing activities). There are already 118 charter schools in the city which will be unaffected by the strike action.
Teachers have expressed a feeling of being bullied throughout the negotiation process, and given that the other side consists of Rahm Emanuel and his handpicked gang of school board members, you could hardly predict that, right? Meanwhile, Emanuel, with a bitter teachers strike and major gun violence happening under his watch, is also beginning to fundraise for Obama-aligned SuperPACs. Because he has the time.
This is part of a larger effort around national reform groups which have a goal of reducing the voice of teachers unions in the education sphere. The CTU strike is a serious test of whether the teachers can notch a victory in what has been a gradual slide toward the so-called reformers in Chicago and throughout the country.
UPDATE: Sen. Dick Durbin urged both sides to get back to the bargaining table today. I would imagine the other famous Democrat from Illinois will get asked about this at some point, and given the uneasy union/reformer relationship, and where President Obama usually falls on that question, that should be a tricky question for him to field.





55 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Obama sorta reminds me of Imelda Marcos – didn’t she have a lot of shoes in her closet?
Very interesting that the charter schools are not affected.
What do you want to bet the majority of those teachers voted for Rahm?
Sure does point to the fact that Democratic “leadership” (Democratic mayor, former chief of staff to current Democratic President) is hostile to working Democrats.
Because I am not “fucking stupid”, I refuse to clap louder.
A 16% raise is peanuts.
… blame the Unions for the fact that their teachers are under-compensated and overworked.
Blame the Unions? If you say so.
.
Glad Rahm has his priorities straight. An epidemic of gun violence and the first teacher strike in 25 years aren’t important to him apparently.
Some days you’re such a shitty troll.
Being the highest, or second highest paid teachers union in the country, does not mean that they’re compensated fairly. Nice swinging strike, though.
Old Rahm seems shaken by this action, don’t cry Rahm! more hell is coming for fake dems!
“While Emanuel usually doesn’t mince words, his anger appeared more internalized, more resolute. At moments, he appeared to be on the verge of tears. His hand shook visibly as he took a sip of water in between statements. “This is a strike of choice,” he said.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/10/chicago-teachers-school-b_n_1869477.html
“There are forces within the Democratic Party who want us to sound like kinder, gentler Republicans.
I want us to compete for that great mass of voters that want a party that will stand up for working Americans.”
—Paul Wellstone
kris @ 9
i think abdul @ 4 is in the running for shitty (math) troll this thread. lol
@11
” …4% annual raise over the four-year contract,…”
Four times four is sixteen, unless that has changed recently.
We’ll give him the Shitty Math Troll award and give alan the Shitty Viewpoint Troll award :)
Teacher strikes or on-the-job protests are erupting in the UK, too.
Good point, there’s more to it than just pay.
In addition, the city picks up a 7 percent pension contribution on behalf of teachers. None of the other top ten cities’ school districts includes a pension pickup.
Adding in all the benefits teachers receive, most notably health care, Chicago teachers drop to third or fourth, according to the Chicago Teachers Union.
But even at 3rd of 4th doesn’t mean the compensation is fair.
I wonder what the average tax payer in Chicago who makes 40% less than the average teacher thinks is fair.
Why is this factoid or made-up-data more relevant than the fact that Rahm reneged on the pay raise the city school board agreed to in collective bargaining with the teachers the last go-round?
You are ignoring the likelihood that the pension obligations are probably carried by the state, not the city or Cook County, and the state has lately been essentially bankrupt. If the pension obligations are payable by the state, they are worth far less than stated value, because the state is already defaulting on multiple debts to municipal & county govts throughout Illinois.
Rahm loves those charter schools. With them, he could come in and close whole schools, thereby putting numerous teachers on lay-off, and bring in a charter school rent-free. Charter schools can hire newly certified university grads with education degrees at $35,000/yr ($17 per hour), and avoid paying the higher union negotiated salaries. With the current job market for recent grads, it is a buyer’s market for young teachers. Plus, these new teachers can be stretched thin by having them assigned to more than 1 charter school. Disaster capitalism to break the (public) unions. Rahm can then brag about the savings, like Scott Walker did to the north.
He also ignores the fundamental reality that teachers are vastly undervalued in our society. Alan thinks that education should be a competitive market with merit-based compensations and appropriations, I’m sure.
He’s a fucking libertarian troll who would throw all children to the wolves if it meant that one poorly performing teacher could be fired.
thank you, jed, @ #10
don’t feel too bad for israeli citizen rahm.
he’s got another country to run to whereas the teachers are fighting for their home city and students and trying to prevent taxpayers public funds being looted by the corps’ privatized “schools.”
I’m with the teachers on this one, but on the issue of pensions, there probably has to be some kind of loss-sharing. Bernanke’s monetary policy is absolutely killing defined benefit pension plans, because they make nothing on treasuries, which they have to hold to balance the portfolio and provide liquidity for payments to current retirees. Those funds used to earn 3 to 4 percent; they now earn less than one percent. The school system is still obligated to pay pensions as if they were making the 3 to 4 percent. It is simply unsustainable. It seems to me that there is room for some compromise here — provided the School Board could be trusted, which might not be the case–for pegging the defined contribution to the current T-bill rate. This is a lot better than cutting pensions forever, since if and when the rate returns to normal, the defined benefit will return to normal. As it is, resentment of taxpayers might screw pension benefits altogether.
We are in a Depression. Unless the one percent can be effectively taxed, the burden has got to be shared among all the 99 percent.
To be fair, the Union has come down on their original demands.
http://www.ctunet.com/blog/cps-fails-to-negotiate-fair-contract-to-prevent-first-labor-strike-in-25-years
CTU Press Release (my bold)
“Recognizing the Board’s fiscal woes, we are not far apart on compensation. However, we are apart on benefits. We want to maintain the existing health benefits.
“Another concern is evaluation procedures. After the initial phase-in of the new evaluation system it could result in 6,000 teachers (or nearly 30 percent of our members) being discharged within one or two years. This is unacceptable. We are also concerned that too much of the new evaluations will be based on students’ standardized test scores. This is no way to measure the effectiveness of an educator. Further there are too many factors beyond our control which impact how well some students perform on standardized tests such as poverty, exposure to violence, homelessness, hunger and other social issues beyond our control.
“We want job security. Despite a new curriculum and new, stringent
evaluation system, CPS proposes no increase (or even decreases) in teacher training. ..
“We are demanding a reasonable timetable for the installation of air-conditioning in student classrooms–a sweltering, 98-degree classroom is not a productive learning environment for children.
“As we continue to bargain in good faith, we stand in solidarity with parents, clergy and community-based organizations who are advocating for smaller class sizes, a better school day and an elected school board. …
For you.
You’re not the only bully on this site, but you appear to be the most foul mouthed.
It’s because of the collapse of the public education system. Wanna blame the Unions?
marym @ 23
thanks! love having “facts” injected into the conversation.
^..^
On both elements, Rahm is essentially attempting to replicate Washington, DC in Chicago. As a long-time DC resident (with no kids in any kind of schools), let me offer my two cents to Chicago teachers: don’t do it. The whole “education reform” propaganda machine is a naked hustle to privatize public education, using bullshit standardized testing to destroy teachers’ negotiated due-process rights on the job. It’s completely fraudulent.
Now, I am not claiming “Stand for Children” is as evil as Michelle Rhee’s fraudulent front for a corporate takeover of public education. The Atlantic had a great recap two years ago about Rhee’s failure in DC. But the DC teachers are still paying the price for her bullshit. However, the board of “Stand for Children” is riddled with private equity and corporate takeover hustlers and charter school advocates.
The Wiki on Michelle Rhee claims her front group is called “Students First,” whose web presences I refuse to link to. I leave it to other Firepups to judge whether there is any substantive difference between Michelle Rhee’s brand of corporate privatization and Stand for Children’s brand.
Nice Polite Repulicans yesterday was making sure that they announced about every 2 seconds that the Chicago Charter schools would NOT be affected by this egregious strike.
Duly noted that so-called “insanely liberal” (what my conservative friends & family members always say) NPR was insistent on letting all their listeners know that the privatized schools would not be affected by teachers demanding fair pay for fair work.
And so: on it goes… down into the toilet with *everyone’s* salaries and benefits.
Think YOUR salary and benefits have nothing to do with this? Guess again.
Good stuff, thanks. I was thinking earlier today about whether this would put a cramp in his fundraising efforts.
Also makes me recall something I read earlier arguing that the unions’ efforts on behalf of Democrats in past years would have been better spent on behalf of a separate Labor Party. Maybe.
Another crucial fact about Chicago’s public school students, courtesy of the New York Times:
You meant to say, National Petroleum Radio, didn’t you?
I am sure they did, that is what happens when you vote for the friend of Obama and dont check the background of the candidate. Anyone who knew who Rahm was and what he stands for cldve easily predicted this. What is going to be fascinating is watching the democrats along with the other unions crush the teachers union in order for Obama to win.
Times story today, linked to above, says Chicago has 45,000 kids in charter schools and 350,000 kids in public schools. Charters are bullshit, not even 12% of the total of 395,000 kids.
Eh? I can go with that. I can also go with National Pentagon Radio, since NPR LOVES nothing more than to WAR-monger. But also: National Propoganda Radio certainly works, as well. If the foo shits…
@AlanTx in re #5.
I find that interesting. Mainly because the city of Chicago is funding those Charter schools … and seemingly handing the CEOs every bit of taxpayer cash they ask for without any contention whatsoever.
So. Does that mean that Charter Schools don’t pay their teachers … or does that mean that corporate Charter Schools are being funded by policy makers while traditional schools are intentionally starved of resources?
To me it looks like Rahm and his ilk are intentionally destroying the quality of education for thousands (millions?) of students to create a political environment that favors giving public contracts to their biggest campaign donors.
Yes, agreed. Charter schools are bullshit, but they are on the rise bc parents have been convinced by propoganda and lies that public schools are horrible, blah blah blah….
It’s clear, though, that NPR (pick your poison of what it stands for) was definitely banging the privatization drum yesterday. Propoganda does work, unfortunately, especially for tribalistic authoritarians, which anymore seems to be almost 99% of the populace.
Yes, yes, and yes.
Funny, isn’t it, that it’s A-OK for our tax dollars to go to RICH people who “privatize” things, but it’s a travesty to have our tax dollars pay fair wages & benefits to those of us in the 99%. Notice how that works, didja??
That’s interesting. So’s this.
ZOMG! You mean people who work in a place where it is more expensive to survive have higher salaries than people who work in less expensive areas?!?!?!?! Hush yo’ mouth!
Socialism!
Those damn teachers are stealing the taxes! ZOMG!
Like I said, he’s just trolling today :) I’m going to continue trolling him back.
As I said @28, the corporate fronts tried this in DC and it didn’t work. The mayor who tried it got his ass fired. The flood of standardized testing is driven by the federal Dept of Educ (i.e., Arne Duncan) under pressure from Congress (i.e., No Child Left Behind). But even Duncan is giving waivers left and right from the severe testing standards.
Most of the testing is useless as a true measure of teacher abilities because, e.g., most of the kids are in poverty (see mine @31), and their lack of attainment is directly caused by poverty. Even more entertaining, however, is the blatant, rampant cheating, probably by school administrators. USA Today did a major investigative report last year which found dozens of DC schools had egregious levels of wrong-to-right erasures on standardized tests.
The cheating is nationwide. USA Today’s investigative series in March 2011 showed the fundamental, widescale corruption of the national testing mania.
DC schools repeatedly refused to investigate the epidemic of cheating in hundreds of their classrooms, using excuses that included accusations of cheating are somehow racist, or that all the wrong-to-right erasures were the children’s fault.
Not likely, there hasn’t been a strike in 25 years, making NOT something that shaped the decision to send a kid to a charter. The systematic dismantling and degradation of the neighborhood school in favor of a quasi-privatized business model school? Now that is something that drives parents away from inclusive public education and into the market mimicking charter system.
The CPS teachers don’t get social security. Since they are in TRS they are excluded from the system. So when you say someone has to lose on the pension front you are telling teachers they should not get social security. People in TRS, SURS etc. have made every contribution required by the contract they signed when they joined these pensions. The city of chicago and state of Illinois has been putting IOUs in the pension fund for decades. Convert the whole system over to SSI and the state will not be able to shirk its responsibilities. This is why you hear no one in the mainstream calling for this solution. The purpose is to cut the standard of living for educators, not the “fix” the pension system.
Many of the same schools had epidemic cheating, year, after year, after year. USA Today reported the names of implicated schools for each of three separate school years, 2007-2008, 2008-2009 & 2009-2010.
Yes, exactly. Here in CA, the school system has been robbed and pillaged, as the wealthy get more tax cuts and loopholes every day.
I’ve witnessed my friends who are teachers (and no, they don’t make GIANT salaries, nor are their pensions all that outrageous) having to handle more and more and more students in their classes with each passing year. They do their best, and these are seasoned teachers with a lot of knowledge and expertise. But after a certain point, they teach to the kids who will actually do the work. They do what they can with the kids who won’t bother (and typically come from exceptionally dysfunctional home environments, including extreme poverty), but there’s only so many hours in each day.
My friends do the following: a) work way more than 40 hours per week, b) buy stuff for their class rooms and for the kids out of their own pockets, and c) offer free tutoring after school (on their own time & dime) to kids who are willing to stay and learn.
Having close to 40 kids in a classroom makes them pretty unmanageable. That’s what the 1% wants, so that they can get OUR tax dollars to run crappy, but non-Union, private charter schools. Some charter schools are better than others, but many are not all that great. It’s just that the parents have been carefully taught that Junior & little Susie won’t have to rub shoulders with those “dirty kids” (a phrase that I hear often from friends of mine – who I like – who insist on sending their kids to charter or private schools).
Go figure.
Team USA, not all that long ago, had a public educational system that was the envy of the world, and ALL citizens used to be PROUD of it.
Sad to see how LOW the mighty have fallen, and how quickly so many citizens can be convinced to drink the shitty privatizing nonsense KOOL AID. Jim Jones would be impressed…
How do the teachers explain that to the average tax payer earning $47,000 per year?
I might make 60% more than you but I’m not living an average lifestyle yet. After I get there we’ll talk about you.
That completely idiotic argument that has no place in this discussion deserves another picture!
Those taxpayers who aren’t earning enough to afford an average lifestyle should form a union and negotiate for better pay.
More bullying from the Bully Goat Gruff.
Just like I just did. In my experience, the average tax payer isn’t a fucking moron – if someone explains how they’re getting bullshitted, usually folks respond by getting pissed at the bullshitter.
Of course, I *would* ask this “average” taxpayer how it is, when the guys at the top are taking home more money than they ever have – subsequently driving the national average salary up to $75K – how come they’re only taking home $47K. Does what they produce warrant being paid less than the average worker … do they deserve to be paid relatively low while the non-productive executive class lives fat on their labor?
Then I’d point out that the politicians aren’t giving us our money back when they fuck over teachers … they’re just handing it to corporate fat-cats and leaving us with nothing but a big fat bill; just like with the bankers.
Of course, long before we get to that last part the conversation has turned to more of a communal bitch-fest. It turns out, not a lot of people *want* to hate on our teachers (or firemen) … it’s a pretty easy sale here in Idaho.
I’m sorry alan. Do you feel bullied? So do the teachers who dedicate their lives to bettering our youth only to receive short wages, long hours, and jeers from your like.
These heroic individuals are directly responsible for the future of this country, yet you would deny them quality healthcare, fair wages, equitable retirement plans, and decent working conditions. I consider your opinions on this particular topic to be fucking heinous. You and your ilk have been bullying teachers for decades and it needs to stop.
So if my language and attitude seem harsh, please try to understand that your ideology and vitriolic bullshit are far harsher, and have been for far longer. I consider your views to be poisonous to our youth, to our communities, and to our country. I’m sure you can understand why I don’t use fucking kid gloves when dealing with your like.
A much more cogent argument than your previous links.
Your argument is so persuasive I may be coming around, except for the short wages (average CTU wage $76,000, average Chicago workers wage $47,000) and long hours (http://stateimpact.npr.org/ohio/2011/10/05/teachers-work-fewer-hours-than-other-professionals-and-were-not-counting-summer-vacations/), and jeers from the likes of me (not one jeer against any teachers on this thread).
I would also take exception to your characterization that I would deny teachers quality healthcare (asking someone to pay a portion of their healthcare is hardly the same as denying them healthcare), fair wages (160% of average seems fair, but I guess they want a little more fairness), equitable retirement plans (retire as early as age 55 will full benefits, yearly benefit average of 4 highest years pay = $70,000/year for life + 3%/year cost of living increases), and decent working conditions (better than digging a ditch). Perhaps my ilk have been, but I have not been bullying teachers for decades or even today. Identifying that they make more than average is not bullying. Calling them sub-human would be.
But I can understand how someone who exaggerates every truthful comment to be vitriolic bullshit would consider those views to be poisonous to our youth, to our communities, and to our country. Gotta go now.
There are multiple comments upthread that effectively disprove your claims about wages. Teachers in Chicago earn, on average, almost $30k a year less than what would equal an AVERAGE lifestyle in the US.
Ask a teacher about their true hours. Most lesson plans are done at home. Most papers are graded at home. Most teachers continue to work long after they leave school.
Asking someone to contribute to their healthcare when they don’t currently is essentially a reduction in compensation. Taking out money that was there previously.
Posting comments that attempt to negate or undermine their concerns, when your comments are framed by your opinion and not cost of living facts or specific understanding of Chicago, is what I characterized as ‘jeer’ing.
I notice that you neglected the amount of years in service needed to retire at 55. Thanks for leaving out one of the most important variables in that equation.
If I had a choice between digging a ditch or trying to control a large amount of children in an enclosed 98 degree space, I’d choose digging a ditch. How about you?
My, this is one entertaining thread! I’ll just add something I heard on NPR on my way home from my adjusted gross income 33K a year government job. The Romney campaign accused Obama of backing the Chicago teachers.
Now, a FDR or Harry Truman or JFK or LBJ might have responded that, hell yes they support the teachers’ union. Obama? A spokesman said that the Obama Administration was not taking sides in this dispute.
And Republicans call this corporatist a socialist. Ha!
What’s more ridiculous is hundreds of thousands of public school teachers voting for this tool who is dead set on destroying public education.
Nothing disproves my claims about wages, it puts it in different context. I say CTU teachers make 160% of what average Chicago earners make, you say teachers in Chicago earn, on average, almost $30k a year less than what would equal an AVERAGE lifestyle in the US. You can explain that to the average Chicago taxpayer and ask him if $76,000 is short wages.
As far as hours, the study I linked to includes lessons and at-home work etc. Some work more, but not the average.
Healthcare contribution is part of the compensation mix. In a perfect world work income would be wages, and you’d go buy healthcare, or food, or a car, or retirement savings savings or whatever you wanted to spend your money on. But it’s all part of the mix now.
No, Jeering is calling someone a troll.
I don’t know why years in service needed to retire at 55 is of concern.
SS benefits are based on 35 years of service at age 65. The teachers can retire from school at age 60 with 20 years and get full benefits (don’t have the numbers in front of me). Sounds like a good deal to me.
On the ditch digging we can agree. Not sure I could still dig, but I could lean on a shovel for Union wages.