Dylan Matthews published a post today about how teacher strikes harm student achievement, reaching all the way to suggest that the future earning potential of students off from school today at the Chicago Public Schools will be impacted by a protracted strike. Let’s set aside the fact that it seems a bit presumptuous to enter into this conversation ONE DAY INTO a strike action, and the fact that the company of the organization for which Matthews works, the Washington Post, has a subsidiary named Kaplan which makes the bulk of its money off test preparation services. The entire rationale for this boils down to lost instructional days for the students, and it’s simply unknowable how many days students will miss and whether or not they will get made up on the back end, as snow days are. This is how it worked when my mother, a teacher, went on strike multiple times in the 1980s. So it’s a speculative discussion.
Of course, what doesn’t get factored into the discussion about future wages is the impact of a weakened national labor movement. I asked Matthews about this on Twitter, and he gave a very specific response about whether or not teacher wages impact the private labor market. I don’t really think that’s a useful way to look at this. Supposedly walled-off sectors which previously had strong labor power have been diminished, and despite the isolated nature of the industry, the parallels between a weaker labor market and national wage stagnation are very clear.
Because that’s what this fight is about: the larger unified movement against workers. It also encompasses more than just wages, even though new rules in Chicago dictate that the contract negotiations are limited to that. This is about the education reform debate, and it represents the first time that a teachers union has really fought back against these largely untested and unproven ideas about how to turn around the so-called “failing” public school system. (Note: the public school system, and more broadly the US education system, isn’t failing). And so before we concern-troll that long strikes could hurt future economic opportunity for students, we have to address whether education policy that allows for looting by business interests through moving schools into the for-profit sector, or the end of collective bargaining as a meaningful check on management keeping all profits for themselves, hurts that economic opportunity to a much greater degree.
Consider these local reports on why this fight happened and how it’s playing out.
YK: Chicago is a pretty divided city, with neighborhoods divided by class. I spent today riding my bike around Latino, working-class neighborhoods — Pilsen, Little Village, and North and South Lawndale. These are areas that aren’t doing well in this economy.
I’m seeing a lot of cars honking their horns, and police running their siren while they go by a school picket. The people that have to deal with the daily reality of school cutbacks, or mental health clinic shutdowns, or how’ll they get home in winter with less public transit, the people who deal with austerity budgets, are in support of the teachers’ strike [...]
When you are here on the ground, it feels like a strong line of opposition. Opposition to policies that aren’t just national but international – think of places like Greece and the more general fights against austerity happening across Europe here.
The national coverage will watch the specific contract terms, though they’ll miss that 10 years from now, the specific, narrow terms will matter less than whether or not a union in an American city will have been successful in pushing back in this way. This is a fight over public resources, public jobs, and the idea of a public that isn’t discussed by national media as if it exists. Will there be public schools as we understand them in 10 years?
The solidarity we see right now will get tested by PR campaigns out of the mayor’s office painting the teachers as greedy and students as innocent victims, helped along by Kaplan Test Prep articles imploring us to think of the children. In reality, this is about two different visions on how to educate kids in the 21st century. More than that, it’s about the role of the American worker and how their position has slipped relative to management. It exists on a continuum with Occupy Wall Street and the Wisconsin uprising. It matters.




27 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Something behind the Chicago manifestation of the class war that literally brings on my asthma (I’m tightening up even as I type right now) is Tax Increment Financing. This is tool that was allegedly meant to fund neighborhood-level urban development by granting tax abatements to new projects built on supposedly “blighted” land. It’s practiced to some extent by many cities (might be enabled in part by federal law, though I’m not sure), but probably nowhere with the divisive and upward-tranferring malice of Chicago for the last 40 years or so. Anyone who thinks “malice” must be some kind of rhetorical excess on my part should first compare some of the areas that have been deemed sufficiently “blighted” to get millions of TIF abatements to areas that wind up as net payers(*)—
—because the kicker to the whole scheme is that the property tax revenue that is not paid by the TIF beneficiaries has to be made up by someone, or else the intended recipients of the millage —such as the Chicago Public Schools, with their current $29million shortfall I’ve heard— will be thrown into deficit and forced to make cuts in many cases. One can see how the likes of Rahm Emanuels’ backers would think this makes a nice little game for them to play, since by the time most people get mad enough to read about TIFs and how they can feed urban funding problems and labor strikes, they’re too mad to read about TIFs and the rest.
_________________________
(*) The author at the Reader link above, who is arguably the city’s TIF-wallah, has some good examples, available by following the “TIF” keyword. Also there’s a good TIF thread at Progress Illinois.
Rahm worked for, and is now raising funds for, Obama.
Obama has a serious bromance with Ronald Reagan.
Reagan got his presidency off to a bang by breaking PATCO.
Show your seriousness of purpose by beating up on a union right before the election.
Pure genius.
Unless TBogg has alternative
universeexplanation.Rahm is merely O’s surrogate testing out the plans of his Sec. of Education…..privatize, charterize and break the teachers unions.
Great piece David. Serious fire here that I haven’t seen in your writing in a while.
meme being glossed over :
Rahm
Duncan
Quinn
Obama &
basically the rest of IL/Chi political landed gentry class
= all of ‘em ..democrats
& all of ‘em walking lock-step in the fraud called charter schools – which is in reality an attack on public sector unions and collective barganing. they are fake democrats who have sold out to the rich who don’t send their kids to public schools and don’t want to be taxed to support public education – end of story
I was on the elevated (el) today – every car jammed with red-shirted teachers, students, mothers & children .. I did not see one chicagoan angry or enraged at these public servants – in fact, on the subway car that I was riding in, a citizens called out, “every teacher here deserves credit – I am a chicagoan who supports you and all teachers. Stand up to Rahm the bully”
so make sure you don’t get all yer news aboout this action from the un-abashed union busting Chicago Tribune and its TV station WGN
chicago stands with our teachers and against fake democracts who conspire to end unionism in a city that created unionism & whose martyrs died for the 8 hour day!!
Under these circumstances–yes–it instantly assumes national proportion. Unfortunately, it’s working people against both the Dems and Republicans, especially where teachers are concerned. But this SHOULD be a place where we can call Obama on the carpet. And if he were worth a crap this would become one of those execrable “teachable moments” that liberals so love. Let’s no one hold our breath if we care to live more than two minutes more.
You got it right!! Obummer, Rahm, and Duncan are all wanting to privitize education and break the unions in the process. However, the teacher unions deserve what they get for not having a backbone years ago and STILL supporting, blindly, the dems. Teachers have not gotten the memo: Dems are anti-union!!!
Vote third party this cycle!!!!!
We need privatized school systems to prepare our children for privatized prisons they will be attending. For profit civilization requires austerity for the lower classes. The lower classes will accept said austerity if they are less educated and ignorant of alternative social structures like Democracy.
Karen lewis’ election as CTU head was fueled by rank and file discontent with the corrupt union leadership which let Vallas-Duncan shock doctrine unchallenged. So kudos to the rank and file teachers for electing a kickass lead they deserved.
True. Conservatives and the 1% don’t “feel like” paying for public schools because they’ve decided (mostly) to opt out of using them. Didn’t used to be that way, but it has become a big class-war issue vis Public Schools.
People who decide to send their kids to private school don’t feel like they should “have to” pay for public schools in the mistaken belief that they “don’t need them.” Nothing is further from the truth, but it contributes to the dumbing down of the populace.
Teachers, though, are often ignorant about what’s happening and reflexively vote for “Democrats” without bothering to read the fine print, so to speak. I know far too many public school teachers who truly don’t get it that both political parties would just as soon see Teachers Unions gone and no more collective bargaining and pensions, plus just crappy benefits and pay, etc.
And you see that quite clearly. The teachers union gave obama support and endorsed him. In return obama’s doing what?
from Dr. Bramhall, last year:
Obama’s appointment of Arne Duncan, former CEO of Chicago Public Schools to head the Dept of Education, suggests states will continue to be under enormous pressure to de-fund public schools – and that many more will close.
While running Chicago schools, Duncan – in collaboration with Mayor Daley’s office and Chicago’s corporate elite – pursued an aggressive school privatization agenda. In 2004, this included an attempt to close 20 out of 22 schools in a low income minority neighborhood. The effort was clearly linked to the mayor’s and property developers efforts to “gentrify” the neighborhood – to force out minority residents and glam up their properties for re-sale to white upper middle class professionals. With all their neighborhood schools closing, low income residents would have no choice but to leave.
http://stuartbramhall.aegauthorblogs.com/2011/03/21/obamas-neoliberal-stance-on-charter-schools/
NEA was the only union that participated fully at the DNC – other unions pulled most of their support.
Take 12 & 13 together for enough to make one all the way crazy…
Dear prostratedragon, You’ve managed to hit my TIF button.
Here in Cali, the state legislature abolished the over 400 re-development agencies – and Good F’ng Riddance!
Here’s how they came to a bad end (from a real and legit starting place): a City, let’s call it “Bacaville” to diguise it’s actual City name. The “Bacaville” City Manager is also the “Head” of the City’s redevelopment Agency and receives over half of her salary from the Agency. The Agency can, without voter approval, or notice, identify an area as blighted and extend credit to a developer to develop the bighted area. As the area is developed and taxes are levied on the newly developed area. The Taxes DO NOT flow into the “Bacaville” general fund to increase city revenues that can be used for all manner of good governance. Instead, they flow back into the redevelopment agency.
Because the general fund is starved for the revenues, the City Manager/Head of redevelopment can then demand concessions from its workforce – because of the decline in the general fund.
Redevlopment is now a developer’s dream slush-fund.
Yes, there’s a Wallmart in a part of recently developed “Bacaville” – and yes, the workforce is five years into a 20% wage cut due to a decline in the general fund.
It sure isn’t about how to make the schools effective at teaching kids, that’s clear.
And conservatives don’t object to paying for public schools because they don’t expect to be using them. They object because the schools aren’t accountable to the parents, and they’d rather pay for schools that are. If public schools could be made accountable, that would be fine, but it seems that in the current system, the only way to make them accountable is to move outside the public system, especially in a state with powerful teachers’ unions.
Ben is great on the details of TIF but hazy on the analysis. Here is a solid analysis.
http://www.chicagonow.com/chicago-muckrakers/2012/06/author-of-study-highlighting-inequality-in-tif-funded-public-schools-reflects/
It made me smile earlier today when I read that Paul Ryan spoke out in support of Rahm against the teachers union. Like David mentioned earlier, I want to see Obama come out his hole on this one, and maybe Ryan attempting to show up him will do it.
Teachers have had to fight hard against Republicans in recent years (in NJ and WI, for example), without much support from the president. Now they have to fight against a Democrat. Perhaps there wasn’t much Obama could do for the teachers to help them against Christie and Walker, but as the leader of the Democratic party he sure as heck could help them here with Emanuel.
This is hollow abstraction in a school system where students get 30% less per capita funding than in the white conservative collar counties. 1 in 4 CPS schools don’t have a library. A meaningful % of classrooms don’t have air conditioning. Class sizes keep rising. CPS terminates skilled mid-career teachers as a cost saving mechanism by burning through new teachers. An art project on state street cost the same as the mental health clinics that Rahm closed. There are 9% fewer trains and 18% fewer buses running than in February 2010. THis is an all out war against the public sector. A war against the bad examples, where rational planning and taxation actually address concrete social needs outside the market place. This is what conservatives hate.
I feel bad for them; they are in a crappy position. Either abandon the Democrats in protest, and potentially give the election over to the Republicans who are 100% hostile. Or give token support to the Democrats, which will reinforce the idea that unions have lost their clout. Pretty amazing where things have ended up 4 years into hope and change.
If you want to see the tragedy of schools given to the value of all being private, take a look at New Orleans…long history of being most all private and/or religious with zip attention to public schools that have been neglected and shameful for years….yep, with lots of the very wealthy showing complete indifference to the public sector. Take a long look at tragedy and lives lost….then blame the parents and the “victims.”
It doesn’t seem there is a genuine fight, at least not yet. Somehow the antagonists seem in bed together for the time being due to the lack of (1) injunctions and fines coming from one direction, paired with (2) public sector sympathy strikes (or less confrontational sickouts) from the other.
Could this minuet be shadow boxing for show to be followed up by a pre-arranged settlement in a day or two? And maybe the PTB know the outcome and have known for awhile? Afterwards everyone has done their duty feigning, and my bet is it will be settled rather quickly after the necessary points are made.
I’m an Easterner and wonder if this would be “The Chicago Way.” Or, how about NYC-lite?
This is nothing like NYC’s garbage,transit, teachers strikes under Mayor John Lindsay, all of which was on my doorstep back then. Now, that was serious business, and I remember it vividly.
The Chicago machine got SB7 last year, a law that made it extremely difficult for CTU to strike (75% of all members had to support a strike) and delimited the things CTU could bargain for. This struggle is real, it is historical and the teachers are winning.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/post/duncan-rhee-starring-at-our-hearts-belong-to-data-summit/2012/01/11/gIQA7bh46P_blog.html
http://www.plunderbund.com/2012/06/26/controversial-education-reform-group-gave-big-grant-to-ohio-chamber/
Corruption via Democrats and Republicans who work for the same masters. Funny how that works.
and from the Great State of Wishy – Warshy, Pacified Northwest —
nada, zip, nothing, zipp-itty do da from the Washington Education Association or its largest local, the Seattle Education Association … no nothing from our institutions!
The Silence is deafening.
The institutional leaders are afeard of missing their quarterly rubber chicken banquets with senior Democrats, where the institutional leaders get to see The Big Board – and so the focus is on NOT getting Walker Scott Rick Rich Perry Prick Scott Brown Newt Mitt,
cuz the Newt-Mitts will get rid of the institutions!
This fight, from the ‘leader’ perspective of Wishy-Warshy, this fight isn’t about the pilfering by “Democratic” yuppie scum, and, oh by the way, the abuse of kids, it is about protecting the institution.
Anybody seen that playbook before?
rmm.
Why The Chicago Teachers Union Deserves Support « Diane Ravitch’s blog
http://dianeravitch.net/2012/09/08/why-the-chicago-teachers-union-deserves-support/
Chicago public school parent addresses issues behind the strike
Video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMUboOIQT48&feature=youtube_gdata_player
Probably too late to get a reply but any useful links?