Eleven years after the attacks on 9-11 and the subsequent Ground Zero volunteer cleanup that left thousands sickened, the federal government finally added cancer to the list of illnesses linked to the attacks.
The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health approved the additions to the list of illnesses covered in the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act, which were proposed in June. The updated regulations take effect 30 days after the ruling is published in the Federal Register.
The decision “marks an important step in the effort to provide needed treatment and care to 9/11 responders and survivors,” said Dr. John Howard, administrator of the World Trade Center Health Program established by the Zadroga law.
This comes too late for James Zadroga. He died of cancer at age 34 after participating in the cleanup at Ground Zero. In all, 400 rescue workers and residents have died from cancer in New York City since 9-11, in ways that suggest links to the attacks (out of a total of 1,000 deaths linked to 9-11 related illnesses). Despite this, it took nearly two years from the passage of the Zadroga bill in late 2010 to finally get cancer covered as one of the illnesses.
Rescue workers are upset that, despite the enhanced coverage of illnesses, the pot of money for compensation for victims will not increase, which probably means lower individual awards. However, the 70,000 surviving workers will likely get free care as a result of the change.
The issue could play a role in a key Senate race in Wisconsin. Tommy Thompson was President Bush’s Health and Human Services Secretary. The Bush Administration did not compensate victims of the environmental hazards at Ground Zero, and downplayed the consequences. When Thompson finally got around to helping workers suffering from illnesses from Ground Zero, it wasn’t as HHS Secretary (where he was criticized for not doing enough), but as a private entrepreneur. His company, Logistics Health Inc., won a CDC contract in 2008 for $11 million to track the health and treat some of the workers exposed to toxic environmental hazards. “It is ironic that former HHS Secretary Tommy Thompson’s firm won the contract to provide the services, given the history of delay from the Bush administration when he was secretary and now,” said Rep. Carolyn Maloney at the time.
Thompson also showed his acumen in issues of protecting innocent citizens from terror when he said in 2004, upon stepping down at HHS, “For the life of me, I cannot understand why the terrorists have not, you know, attacked our food supply. Because it is so easy to do.” Fortunately, nobody took him up on the tip.
For the moment, it’s positive that cancer survivors may get the treatment they need, but clearly more money is needed for the compensation system for those exposed at Ground Zero.




21 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Hogwash. A rare total fail by Mr. Dayen.
In making this accusation, your point is?
Let me break it down for you:
“Eleven years after the attacks on 9-11 and the subsequent Ground Zero volunteer cleanup that left thousands sickened” – It was a disaster zone. Volunteers had no business being there, especially if they started to feel ill. Yet people with pre-existing conditions came to Ground Zero, some for as little as a few hours, and then filed compensation claims.
“This comes too late for James Zadroga. He died of cancer at age 34 after participating in the cleanup at Ground Zero.” — Zadroga’s cancer had nothing to do with Ground Zero. Nado. Zilch. Bupkiss. Cancer is a serious of mutations that generally takes decades to develop. We know these from previous nuclear and chemical disasters.
“In all, 400 rescue workers and residents have died from cancer in New York City since 9-11, in ways that suggest links to the attacks (out of a total of 1,000 deaths linked to 9-11 related illnesses).” – Entirely accounted for by surveillance bias.
“it took nearly two years from the passage of the Zadroga bill in late 2010 to finally get cancer covered as one of the illnesses.” — Good. It should never have been covered at all.
“Rescue workers are upset that, despite the enhanced coverage of illnesses, the pot of money for compensation for victims will not increase, which probably means lower individual awards.” — You can bet the pot of money WILL increase, because the theme of this story from the beginning has been give an inch, take a mile.
“However, the 70,000 surviving workers will likely get free care as a result of the change” — There is no free care. The guys all across the country doing dirty jobs day in and day out for little pay and no benefits will have bear to the cost of this care.
“The Bush Administration did not compensate victims of the environmental hazards at Ground Zero, and downplayed the consequences” — This is very misleading. There are a number of different compensation funds at the municipal state and federal level, not to mention private, and some started paying benefits as soon as an injury occurred.
“For the moment, it’s positive that cancer survivors may get the treatment they need, but clearly more money is needed for the compensation system for those exposed at Ground Zero.” — No. Less money is needed for the over-entitled ’9/11 Community’ and more money is needed for the average Joe taxpayer who has to pay for this crap. It gives patriotism a bad name.
P.S. I wrote that it was “very misleading” to say that the Bush Administration did not compensate victims of the environmental hazards at Ground Zero. — I should have said it’s completely false. It is a lie.
Are you a Doctor?
Christie Whitman said the Plume from the vaporized Twin Towers was “safe to breathe”. The volcanic type plume was highly toxic. The Secret Government concealed this. They ordered Whitman to lie. She lied. The neo-con falsehoods about the poisoned air, will continue to kill the 9-11 first responders for years to come.
— Zadroga’s cancer had nothing to do with Ground Zero. Nado. Zilch. Bupkiss. Cancer is a serious of mutations that generally takes decades to develop. We know these from previous nuclear and chemical disasters.
I’m going to call BS on this blanket statement. Actually what we know about mutations(which you admit cancer is) in general is that they are not one size fits all(Some cancers are aggressive and grow quickly, others are much slower).
Furthermore, the discussion among pediatric oncologists, is that there is a suspicion that environmental factors are involved in regards to pediatric cases(so why in the world would we think ADULTS would be immune to environmental factors?)
Your statements defy logic and what factual evidence has suggested.
The Bush administration told them it was SAFE to work there. They lied every step of the way to downplay it. And how to put this politely, bmull? The fact that you come across as a total dick, I mean. Best just to say it I think.
You are right about guys across this country doing dirty jobs for low pay and no benefits. Because THEY gave an inch, and corporations have taken a mile. If you won’t fight for one, you won’t fight for anyone.
And there are a shitload of cancers that happen very quickly, and the worse the exposure to chemical or nuclear disasters, the quicker the onset. But you know that.
I am an average Joe taxpayer. This should have been done years ago. But the Bush administration had ‘other priorities’ than patriotism. So peddle that crap somewhere else.
Are you going to give us citation for that extraordinary claim or are we just supposed to believe you because of your obvious superiority?
Ironic…is that the word for Mr. Thompson. Looks like a clear shot at a bigger bang for his buck….Seems to follow the Mitt position of any position as needed.
And don’t we have the most craptacular system ever- even if the claim were somehow true(which I’d bet it is NOT)- that someone would go volunteer at a toxic work site so they could have health care coverage for their disease is pretty f-ing crappy.
But hey,if I’m Bmull, I totally blame the victim.
okay ill say it
all cancers should be paid for,all diseases too
universal healthcare AFFORDABLE and OMNIPRESENT…stick the bombs and warheads up T Ts arse and all the other war profiteers
but but but the “average Joe tax payer” will have to pay for it(I guess it’s an improvement that one of them is FINALLY acknowledging that the Romneys of the world are not paying all the taxes by their wittle selves- as they often suggest that half the hard working Americans are a bunch of freeloaders.)
My two cents- I’d gladly pay for a system that ensures that anyone who is ill gets the care they need. Then again I’m not a selfish, entitled jerk who owns 5 homes and shelters my millions from the country I live in and then complains about my tax rate.
Having been a cancer researcher, I should point out that 400 cancer deaths in eleven years out of a pool of 70,000 people isn’t extraordinary….if the average age of the pool is 65-80. It’s pretty high for rescue workers from 2001 however, whose average age is much younger. Though the death rate from carcinoma is higher in the overall population, aggressive cancers just aren’t that common among younger people. The fact is that if you live long enough and don’t die of something else first, you’re going to get cancer but usually screening isn’t recommended before the age of 50. 400 deaths in 70,000 people who were in their 20s and 30s a decade ago is a really high mortality rate and I haven’t even seen stats on incidence of cancers. We’re only talking about fatalities. Even among the elderly population I was working with, it was a rare occasion indeed that I sent a death certificate to the tumor registry. Most of them died of something else.
Hear! Hear!
as long as these scum profit off the absolute misery and fear of their “fellow Merkins” these caven pigs will continue to fatten up. while millions will be bankrupted after the heartbreak of disease.
small article today
Cat Killah is divorcing,should be billions in the settlement
If I believed in Hell, I would also believe there’s a very special, extra-warm place carved out already for Tommy Thompson and Christine Todd Whitman. I cannot understand how the people of Wisconsin can possibly think of sending this crook and liar to the United States Senate this November.
He is awful.
Whitman is such a wonderful illustration for beaten
wifemoderate Republican syndrome.Lyin’ Ryan will never never never forget 9-11.
He also opposed the Zadroga Bill, twice.
This should give you a general idea of why it could happen Teddy.
http://www.prwatch.org/news/2012/09/11739/alec-member-american-chemistry-council-drops-649k-wisconsin-us-senate-race
Plus the DNC/DLC (whomever one thinks is actually in charge) is not spending much on the US Senate nor on US Congressional(D)candidates.
Then in my WI State Assembly District, for our three rural counties anyway, because of supposed voter fatigue with recall related endless issues phone banking on behalf of anti-Walker forces being seen (incorrectly in my opinion) as having hampered potential (D) recall turnout, it is my understanding that local Dumbocratic Party leaders are
askingrequiring that all Nov 6, races be bundled into a group support exercise so all (D) candidates are referred to in a single phone call or canvassing visit, as much as can be managed. OFA has been willingly given the reins over the local party Dbots and Obots and that money and infrastructure.Therefore, many formerly (D leaning) active volunteers (and their dollars) who are refusing to support sorry O are finding it more difficult here, to effectively work outside of existing local party structure in helping elect Baldwin, or someone like US Congressional candidate Jamie Wall against incumbent idiot Reid Ribble while withholding direct or indirect support of Obomba. If one is not an absolute and total dbot, even with a couple key state level D races hanging in the balance, official party shunning of potential local level workers who are not “all in,” for Obomba is deemed wholly appropriate. These are the same local D leadership who still refuse to even discuss as a possibility, that the DLC>Rahm>Barrett nod as recall candidate and diffusion of LABOR issues was the straw that broke the recall’s back.