Good to know that the credit rating agencies have learned approximately nothing since last year. Then, they initiated a downgrade of the United States, determining that their debt would be a riskier instrument after the debacle of the debt limit deal. Investors responded by pouring money into US Treasuries and dropping the yields at one point to under 1.5% (it’s at around 1.676% today). The markets, then, thoroughly ignored the warnings of the rating agencies, and by extension discredited them. They saw US treasuries as a safe instrument rather than a downgraded one.
So what does Moody’s come out and say today? That the US credit rating depends on fiscal cliff talks:
The U.S. government’s debt rating could be heading for the “fiscal cliff” along with the federal budget.
Moody’s Investors Service said Tuesday it would likely cut its “Aaa” rating on U.S. government debt, probably by one notch, if budget negotiations fail.
If Congress does not reach a budget deal, more than $600 billion in spending cuts and tax increases will automatically kick in starting Jan. 1, a scenario that’s been dubbed the “fiscal cliff,” because it is likely to send the economy back into recession and drive up unemployment.
Here’s the craziest part of this. In the event that the country falls off the fiscal cliff, over the short term you would see a recession. Over the long-term, the alleged debt crisis goes completely away. The budget goes into primary balance (ex-payments on the national debt). And the US credit rating mostly impacts LONG-TERM DEBT! So why should a scenario that actually reduces the long-term deficit have anything to do with the credit rating?
As Joe Weisenthal indicates, this statement by Moody’s is insane for a few other reasons.
One of our favorite charts in the world is this one from Richard Koo, which shows that during (Japan’s) great recession, any attempt to cut spending actually saw borrowing RISE.
So not only does this warning from Moody’s come at a terrible time, it’s asking Congress to do something impossible, which is reduce debt-to-GDP by focusing on debt-to-GDP rather than focusing on growth.
It’s not like Moody’s would be somehow happier if the fiscal cliff were punted into the future with everything extended. And yet that would be the most logical move from the standpoint of short-term growth. I have no idea what Moody’s wants the United States to do. They need to come to a “deal” but not wreck the economy, even though coming to a deal would do so. They need to face down the long-term growth of deficits and debt, but doing absolutely nothing, which Moody’s rejects, would actually accomplish that. The best thing to say is that Moody’s doesn’t know what they’re talking about.
The market is trading higher today despite this warning. It’s another indication that nobody cares what the rating agencies have to say about sovereign debt.




18 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
That’s the “best” thing because otherwise we must think that Moody’s fell into a wormhole and came out anti-Moody’s. Last year, the ratings agencies downgraded the U.S. because we got to the brink of not paying our bills. This year they want to downgrade the U.S. because we are threatening to take action to pay our bills. Idiots.
There is only one possible reaction to this.
I am constantly amazed that after endless examples of the ratings agencies being shown to be absolutely devoid of integrity and eagerly prostituting themselves, that anyone, for any reason, takes anything they have to say for any value whatsoever.
Why are you amazed?
If politicians can be bought, it stands to reason that so can ratings agencies.
If anything following their collaboration in selling risky debt vehicles as safe investment opportunities I’m completely unsurprised that they are being stupid again.
The way I see it, we shoulda had a much bigger bicentennial celebration.
We might not have another one.
Really? hopefully you dont actually believe that.
The deficit is an ex-post accounting result.
A picture of a bridge collapse doesnt tell you what caused the collapse.
Trying to cut the deficit by cutting the budget would be like fixing a collapsed bridge by photoshopping a picture of the collapsed bridge.
Is Moody’s a subsidiary of Goldman Sachs or JP Morgan Chase?
It’s the Western method of addressing the symptoms rather than the cause, just like healthcare.
Duhh.
Undo what ever bill it was that Gingrich used to separate spending the money from raising the debt limit! It used to be part of the process before he and his cronies separated the two for the cause of political showmanship.
President Catfood, so he has cover to shred the social safety net, like how he tried to do so before under the cover of the ratings agencies.
Probably both.
I wonder how much of a kickback they get for any fire sale items they convince the government to privatize.
There is no “fiscal cliff.” There is either (1) a one year fiscal dip followed by a decline in debt-to-GDP ratio or (2) no dip followed by a continuing rise in debt-to-GDP ratio. At least, those are the CBO alternatives.
The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities had a better idea: let the Bush tax cuts expire. That causes the debt-to-GDP ratio to flat-line and causes no fiscal dip.
Our debt has been growing since 1836, which is the last time we paid it off. Since then we keep rolling it over. For example, we’ve never paid for WWII, and it’s still a significant portion (20%, if I recall correctly) of our national debt.
If we want our debt to go away, we can simply stop borrowing and cover our tax deficits with Treasury-issued money, just like Abraham Lincoln and Adolph Hitler did. The law authorizing the Treasury to do so, 31USC5112(k), has been in place since 1996.
I think the “fiscal cliff” will turn out to be more like a speed bump. Once members of Congress hear from their campaign contributors, the government will spend money. Although a 10 percent cut in the Pentagon budget might be a good start.
Predictions of a new recession that adds 2 million to the unemployment rolls might be overblown.
“The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities had a better idea: let the Bush tax cuts expire. That causes the debt-to-GDP ratio to flat-line and causes no fiscal dip.”
Yes, that’s the easiest as it just happens by default. There’s need to negotiate anything.
Well, I guess I’ll vote for the war criminal over the over the con-man of the moment serving as tool for the Koch brother’s slow motion coup d’etat. You know, the one they began in 2000 with Bush v. Gore. Has it really come to this?
No it hasn’t. You can vote for a third party candidate. I’d suggest Stein but Anderson and the Socialist candidate also seem to be good people that aren’t war criminals or con men.
Even voting for Gary Johnson is better than voting for the other two (but I’ll be voting for Stein).