The war of wordsbetween China and Japan over a chain of uninhabited islands has the potential to escalate in disturbing ways, and destabilize a region that is central to the world’s economic performance.
Some major Japanese brandname firms announced factory shutdowns in China on Monday and urged expatriates to stay indoors ahead of what could be more angry protests over a territorial dispute between Asia’s two biggest economies.
China’s worst outbreak of anti-Japan sentiment in decades led to weekend demonstrations and violent attacks on well-known Japanese businesses such as car makers Toyota and Honda, forcing frightened Japanese into hiding and prompting Chinese state media to warn that trade relations could now be in jeopardy.
Another outbreak of anti-Japan sentiment is expected across China on Tuesday, the anniversary of Japan’s 1931 occupation of parts of mainland China.
China and Japan do a massive amount of trade ($345 billion last year), with many component parts of that trade coming in from around the world. The provenance of the Diaoyu Islands (in the Chinese language; Japanese call them Senkaku) could disrupt all of that. In the past week, Japan purchased some of the islands, part of a World War II-era dispute (and actually before that, in the 19th century Sino-Japanese War) over who owns what territories, from private owners.
The protests in China yesterday were increasingly disturbing. Joe Weisenthal showed some examples of the slogans on his site, including this one calling for the “extermination” of the Japanese. China is currently sending 1,000 fishing boats into the area around the islands in the South China Sea. This could lead to a response, if Japanese Coast Guard authorities try to repel the fishing boats.
How could a small chain of uninhabited islands provoke this much anger and hatred? GlobalSecurity.org runs it down. A series of vague statements and blunders arising out of the post-WWII administration of territory can be blamed. However, this surely stands as a proxy for a global economic slowdown that has hit China particularly hard. It’s better to focus on the treachery of an enemy like Japan than the slowing of the economy and decrease of living standards.
If China tries to reassert control over the islands, the US may be bound by a Mutual Cooperation and Security Treaty with Japan to involve itself (and failing to do so cedes to the Chinese argument that the Diaoyu are their territory). The larger story, however, is that the global slowdown is provoking civil unrest. You can already see stateside effects of the global slowdown in the manufacturing data. QE3 might have its best effect for the US in lowering the value of the dollar and promoting exports, but you have to have sales for that. And this slowdown, which will only be prolonged by a China-Japan dispute, militates against that.
Photo by Remko Tanis under Creative Commons License





8 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
DDay… did you change the author and delete comments? Not sure if I said anything inappropriate…
Prior comments went *poof*!
It was up under Jane’s byline, I’m sure.
That’s it! David doesn’t exist! There are really a dozen writers that all publish as DD! I always wondered how he could get so much done.
:)
seriously… I hope Jane pulls his password at some point and REQUIRES him to take a week off… I don’t want him burning out!
The islands have oil both sides could share but won’t.
Error in both headline and body of the text: The South China Sea is the location of other insignificant islets and rocks which are disputed by China and various countires, not including Japan, but the Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands are in the East China Sea.
Also, unless you want to help China with its propaganda efforts, it should be noted that the purchase of these islands by the Japanese government was not intended as a provocation, but rather to frustrate an attempt by the nationalist governor of Tokyo to use them as a stage for anti-Chinese provocations. That China has used the purchase to escalate the dispute demonstrates that that government’s agenda is quite different from Japan’s.
I have to agree with kapock. The Chinese capitalist imperialists and their running dog lackeys, when not opressing the working classes, are trying to expand their territory on all fronts, whether it be Tibet in the west, the South China sea, or the East China sea. All of these “disputes” seem to have one common element, China expanding its territory and control of resources. Chairman Mao must be rolling over in his grave.
I’m not certain but I don’t think that’s the case. Again in contrast to the South China Sea territorial disputes where undersea drilling, navigation rights in vital shipping lanes, and other bread-and-butter issues are front and center, the Senkaku/Diaoyu contest is fueled mostly by pure nationalistic pride. This is also the case farther north in the rival Japan vs. Korea claims to the Liancourt/Takeshima/Dokdo islets in the Sea of Japan (or East Sea, as Korea calls it. God, these fights cause misery just in the nomenclature).
Having oil or whatever at stake can at least have the benefit of keeping the parties’ minds on the outsize economic costs of military confrontation, and suggesting the advantages of compromise so that the valuable work of profiting from despoiling the environment can proceed. When the fight is purely over who gets to plant a flag on yonder barren rock anything can happen.