Here’s an update on that Republican effort to increase STEM graduate visas to foreign students at US colleges and universities. It was actually even more cynical than I thought. I knew that Republicans wrote the bill to take away one immigration visa from the Diversity Visa Program for every visa it added for STEM graduates (graduates in science, technology, engineering and math). I didn’t know that they put the bill on the suspension calendar. That means it required a two-thirds vote for passage. Democrats don’t support a zero-sum game on immigration visas, they just want more STEM graduate visas issued. So Democrats voted against the bill in large numbers, and instead of this just being opposition on passage, it killed the bill.
Republican leaders called the vote under a fast-track procedure that limits debate but also requires a two-thirds majority to pass. The final tally was 257 to 158, with all but a few Republicans joined by 30 Democrats in voting yes, well short of passage [...]
While Congressional Republicans have taken a hard line on illegal immigration, they said they wanted to show before the November elections that they were ready to pass a measure to fix a widely acknowledged flaw in the legal immigration system.
This is only true in the narrow sense of “wanted to show.” They in fact wanted the bill to fail, so they could point their finger at the Democrats for torpedoing a “common-sense approach” of ensuring that high-skill foreign students who graduate from US schools get to stay in the country to work. So they added their poison pill of killing the visa lottery program, and let Democrats do their work of killing the bill.
Matt Yglesias says this is why we can’t have nice things, and he’s right to an extent. He says that Democrats stopped the STEM graduate visa increase from happening when they had a Congressional majority by tying it to comprehensive immigration reform, and certainly they did so. But I don’t know that Republican Senators would have necessarily supported such a standalone bill; they certainly didn’t on the DREAM Act, which had lots of bipartisan support until Democrats created a standalone bill, and suddenly all that Republican support dried up.
It’s definitely true that Congress prefers posturing over solving even problems on which they agree. And that’s true on both sides of the aisle at different times. Most of the commentary from those working in the space, however, is that the Republican bill will actually move things forward eventually, perhaps in 2013, particularly if the White House shows its support. Silicon Valley is already behind it, so there’s lobbying muscle there. This looks like an early win for whoever becomes President. But for now, cynicism reigns.




4 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Shouldn’t that be?
Congress Inaction
;-)
Our Congress cannot work without compromise. Thus the obstructionism of the Republicans is simply callous, partisan and self serving. They do the business of the GOP and not the business of the nation.
Yet, when the Democrats had a majority in both Houses they could not pass legislation then either. We are hopelessly deadlocked and both parties must share the blame, one for selfish self interest and the other for incompetence. This seems likely to continue until the GOP has the White House and the Legislature or, in a far better scenario, progressive third party legislators are in place to swing votes.
Where is the “skills shortage” to justify more STEM visas (or H-1B)? Is there any objective evidence such as spiking salaries? We’ve heard claims of a shortage of scientists for decades. Show me a closed factory that will benefit from engineers without money to buy them food, shelter, and tools.
http://wdp.wharton.upenn.edu/books/why-good-people-cant-get-jobs/
The mainstream media have lots of sob stories about sympathetic young PhD graduates from overseas that want to start a company in the US and when the same show gives time to US workers, the lighting is dim and the US worker is portrayed as obsolete. The reality is that US companies want these visas to create a more coercive workplace. These visas are outsourcing! The US worker loses a job as I did eight months ago, and I am still unemployed despite good references and current skills.
More kabuki and spin from both sides.
Democrats could put FDR’s entire New Deal on the table, along with Johnson’s entire Great Society.
They would not even have to worry about paying for any of it because they would know with 100% certainty that none of it would pass. But the base would cheer them and get even more ginned up against the bad, bad Republicans, even though not a thing had actually happened.
For their part, Republicans could put the entire Republican/Teabagger/Libertarian Koch bothers wet dream Platform on the tabled, together with a declaration of war against Iran, secure in the knowledge that Democrats would block it, or at least as much of it as Democrats did not really want, right along with their Republican brothers and sisters (much like Democrats voted for the Iraq War, the ludicrous War on Terror and the Patriot Act).
And Republicans would cheer them and get even madder at those bad, bad Democrats, even though little to nothing had actually changed for the better.
And that is always the plot in the Washington D. C. kabuki theater.
How long are we all going cheer “our” side and get outraged and ginned up at “their” side over zero actual positive change?