A direct action group called Tar Sands Blockade has been harassing TransCanada and their efforts to build the lower half of the Keystone XL pipeline.
That portion, from Cushing, Oklahoma to the port at the Gulf of Mexico in Texas, was approved by President Obama as a way to speed through to international markets what has become a glut of oil being processed in the interior of the United States. It’s seen as a prelude to the potential approval of the northern half of the pipeline, which would connect Cushing to the tar sands region of Alberta, allowing “the biggest carbon bomb on the planet” of energy-intensive tar sands oil to move to the Gulf.
Tar Sands Blockade has been trying to block construction on the lower half of the pipeline, shutting it down for days at a time. Today, eight members of the group climbed up into trees 80 feet in the air, trees in the proposed path of the pipeline that would otherwise get cut down.
Eight people climbed 80 feet into trees in the path of Keystone XL construction, and pledged not to come down until the pipeline is stopped for good. Construction cannot proceed until tree-sitters descend and TransCanada clear-cuts through hundreds of trees to make way for the toxic tar sands pipeline.
The blockade is carefully organized to ensure that everyone sitting in the trees can remain safe as long as TransCanada does not attempt to continue clear-cutting the trees. These ardent advocates of landowner’s rights and climate justice have the safety equipment and food supplies to last indefinitely.
The advocates have attempted to use the anger over eminent domain laws and the takeover of private property for the purpose of the pipeline as much as they have used the principles of environmental and climate justice. One of the blockade members, Mary Washington, said in a statement, “This pipeline is a disaster for everyone it touches, from the cancer tar sands extraction is causing indigenous communities, to the water poisoned by inevitable tar sands spills, to the landowners whose land has been seized, and to everyone that will be affected by climate change,.”
Tar Sands Blockade is currently raising money around the action, one of several against pipelines and other core elements of fossil fuel production and distribution around the country. This is an aggressive example of what has become a growing climate action movement. “Taking action is less risky than doing nothing,” said Tar Sands Blockade spokesperson Ron Seifert.




23 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
I’m amazed and a little encouraged that they have been able to find 8 people to do this. In this modern era of facebook and twitter, where civil disobedience comes down to whether or not we ‘Like’ something, it’s nice to see some people still know how to get things done.
Hope you keep this one on your radar.
I hope the NDAA isn’t used to characterize this civil disobedience as “terrorism”. Keystone will be a disaster one way or the other. Obama has more than one “all of the above” plan in operation right now.
Excellent. Thanks for posting this.
“This is an aggressive example of what has become a growing climate action movement. “Taking action is less risky than doing nothing,” said Tar Sands Blockade spokesperson Ron Seifert.”
I hope he’s right.
Takes a lot of courage to do what those people are doing, and I thank them.
Definitely. We contacted them this morning to see if there was any way we could help.
It’s great that FDL is supporting this action. Does anyone know what Bill McKibben and 350.org are doing to support this action?
Would put this in big print:
Why has law failed us? What a lousy president. God bless these people.
Is property vs. conscience involved? It’s “terrorism.”
Unfortunately, as brave as they are, they will probably be taken out by some police force and jailed as “terrorists.”
In this part of the country there are signs of an amazing coalition of people in response to KeystoneXL, where else can you see a third generation Republican rancher in a agreement with a ‘hippie tree-hugger’ environmentalist. There is also growing distrust and action on tracking, but when people in east Texas and Oklahoma have to start thinking about earthquake insurance, reality begins to hit home.
That’s what Barry’s NDAA was all about, dissent cannot be allowed.
Sounds like bail money may be what they need at this point :-(
They’re going to turn red in the face and stomp their feet before fading away, like their response when Obama refused to reinstall solar panels on the White House.
Since no one responded to my query i did a little research. On the 350.org site there is no mention of the blockade.
I dug deeper and found a Counterpunch takedown of the whole Tar Sands Action charade. It seems that Slick Willie McKibben’s Tar Sands Drama and new found love for Obama is part of a well funded Manufactured Consent PR campaign.
I thought we wouldn’t be fooled again but the Dem operatives behind this are laughing while Lt Dan Choi sits in court waiting for the hammer to fall.
You do realize that Jane Hamsher, founder of this blog, and the Editor Scarecrow (John Chandley) were arrested in the Tar Sands XL Pipeline Action in front of the Whitehouse last year, along with Dan Choi, right?
And right along with Bill McKibben.
So if you think it’s all a “manufacturing consent” campaign you better look around more closely.
I am aware that Jane and others were arrested there and i did not include them as complicit in the charade, i believe they were misled also.
As to Lt Dan he seems to be the one that is paying the most for his involvement since Obama’s Justice Department has singled him out for special treatment.
Just clarifying, you are saying Jane and Scarecrow were misled.
I’m not sure about your reading skills, i said i believed they were misled they can speak for themselves.
My reading skills are fine. My blogging skills are just fine too, and this link of your comment is in my bookmarks to cut to the chase when you start other bullshit about the site.
Because Jane and Scare are no fools. If you want to claim they were misled, fine. But you couldn’t be more wrong.
Well then prove that this supposed Grassroots Movement was not a greenwashing campaign to boost Zeros enviornmental creds before the election.
It was quite a suprise that McKibben declared victory as soon as Obama postponed the decision on the pipelline not canceled it and then declared his support for Obama’s reelection.
Where was McKibben when Obama recently approved the southern section of the pipeline, where is he now that a real Grassroots Movement is blockading it’s construction?
Since he said that this was the most critical enviornmental movement of the century why isn’t he there in the trees. I guess he is waiting until after the election so as not to offend his new friend in the White House.
Since i made no reference to this site you know where you can put your bookmark.
You charm is unsurpassed, may I say.
If you want to call this greenwashing, then we are not speaking the same language.
Your arrogance is unsurpassed, i might respond. I have a fairly good idea what language you speak and i try to avoid it, i prefer to hear the truth.