The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence index shot up today, rising from 61.3 in August to 70.3 in September. This typically correlates with a brighter outlook for the economy, and could lead to stronger consumer spending. However, it may be worthwhile to ignore the Conference Board’s index in the last couple months of an election cycle. Brad Plumer argues using Gallup poll data that Democrats have improved their outlook on the economy, as a kind of refracted benefit for the improving outlook for the President and the party in the upcoming elections.
The Gallup Economic Confidence ratings show this pretty clearly. While Republicans remain at exactly the same level on the economy, and independents have grown slightly more optimistic, Democrats have spiked, up 23 points in the index over the past three weeks.
The signifying event in between there is Bill Clinton’s speech, which among Democrats – and even independents – has apparently convinced them that the economy is on track, with better times ahead. The numbers all shoot up in that week after the Clinton speech, and for Democrats, that bounce never dissipated.
I think the lesson here is that, in our increasingly tribal politics, people take their cues on the economy as much from the perceptions of their leaders as they do from lived experience. This is particularly acute right before an election, which brings out all kinds of red team-blue team dynamics. So I don’t think we can put too much stock in consumer confidence reports for the next 42 days. If the spending rises, maybe I’d look at it differently. No matter what Bill Clinton tells you, your pocketbook has the money in it that it has.





4 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
I was thinking the same thing this morning when I saw the spike. Obviously the markets didn’t think much of the news today. Bigger numbers will be GDP later this week and unemployment next week.
Government supplied statistics, just like the MSM and Polling data have become an arm of the PTB Propaganda Department.
The Concon survey(s)(UofM and Conference Board) are almost perfectly coincident with the stock market. For their entire lives people have been told that the stock market discounts all information thus predicting the future direction of the economy. A bunch of New Age like clap trap. Pre Greenspan and the activist Fed, pre shadow banking/non banks dominating credit growth, the stock market simply followed the liquidity in the system as influenced, strongly, by ordinary monetary policy. Stocks and the economy responded to the credit cycle and since stocks can act instantly while it takes months for jobs and output to rise the nonsense ‘see the future’ story stuck.
Now however with monetary policy on Nitros and Turbocharged the liquidy flows exclusively into the financial sphere to bid up stocks and all financial asset prices. Sure, some tinkles down here but not much. With a strong stock market this fall under the $40 billion a month MBS buying program by the Fed and the promise, now confirmed of more to come in QEIII, ‘consumers’ are confident since the stock market tells them to be.
Bernake openly and proudly advertises the fact that monetary policy is intended to drive up stock prices and ‘confidence’ by the way. Nary a finger has been lifted in 4 years now into the ever more apparent abnormalities and manipulation of stock prices. Which stands to reason since the administration is counting on a manipulated market to keep it in power.
There was one major divergence in this that I have ever seen and that was starting in the fall of 07 as the ConCon numbers contiuned to fall as the market made a new all time high and stayed relatively strong until the crisis of 08 hit. I am saddened the public is again buying this snake oil.
Thank you, David.