For the second time in a week, workers at Walmart stores, this time in five states, have walked out on the job. While Walmart does not allow unions, and the strikes are relatively time-limited, this surge of worker activism at the nation’s largest employer is one of the biggest stories in US labor relations.
This morning, workers walked off the job at stores in Dallas, Texas; Miami, Florida; Seattle, Washington; Laurel, Maryland; and Northern, Central, and Southern California. No end date has been announced; some plan to remain on strike at least through tomorrow, when they’ll join other Walmart workers for a demonstration outside the company’s annual investor meeting in Bentonville, Arkansas. Today’s is the latest in a wave of Walmart supply chain strikes without precedent in the United States: From shrimp workers in Louisiana, to warehouse workers in California and Illinois, to Walmart store employees in five states.
“A lot of associates, we have to use somewhat of a buddy system,” Dallas worker Colby Harris said last night. “We loan each other money during non-paycheck weeks just to make it through to the next week when we get paid. Because we don’t have enough money after paying bills to even eat lunch.” Harris, who’s now on strike, said that after three years at Walmart, he makes $8.90 an hour in the produce department, and workers at his store have faced “constant retaliation” for speaking up.
Maybe there really is such a thing as pushing the US worker too far. You wouldn’t know it from the decline in real wages that has been going on almost unabated since 1979. You wouldn’t know it from the crushing of the labor movement and the decline in union density. You wouldn’t know it from the intimidation and harassment that accompanies any effort to organize and collectively bargain, especially at Walmart. But maybe this Walmart work stoppage is a symbol of cracks in the great compression of worker power in the US over the past 30-plus years. Maybe enough workers have become angry enough to fight.
Walmart has tried to dismiss these efforts. But given that they are the only strike actions in the history of the retailer, and that they’re spreading, I would guess there are some hairs being pulled out of heads among executives in Bentonville.
A supplier to Walmart recently settled its strike with warehouse workers by rescinding retaliatory measures against labor organizers and offering back pay to the striking workers. So something is happening, and I would recommend keeping an eye on the non-union worker collective OUR Walmart for more potential actions ahead.




12 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
And of course this will never, ever make the network TV news or drive-time radio, the two places that the majority of Americans might have a prayer of hearing about it.
Do a web search on “walmart strike” and you’ll see that the vast majority of cites are for FDL and HuffPost and Salon. Not a word in the NYT, WaPo, LAT, CBS, NBC, ABC (except on one of their online blogs that gets minimal traffic/eyeballs compared to a TV news program), PBS, and certainly not FOX (unless of course somebody gets beaten up and FOX can find a way to blame it on the strikers).
In other news, the IMF thinks China will have a soft landing. That’s good news for the rest of the world (including us), and has come about in large part because China is doing lots of stimulative activities, the most important being to take a lot of the big-ticket items it previously made for exports — particularly solar and wind installation gear — and marketing them at home, both to keep the prices up for overseas sales and to put even more strength behind their growing efforts to get off of fossil fuels.
I can hardly wait for Obama to come out for the workers. I’m waiting. Still waiting. Well I’m sure Trumka will speak up.
Trumka will immediately be joined, on stage, by Leo Gerard and Lee Saunders, any minute now, solidarity …
Any moment now, Arbusto … I sure we can count on them.
(Obama is searching for his shoes, just as soon as he finds them he’ll be walking the walking …)
Any minute … now …
Any minute …
Any … now …
Patience …
Any?
DW
DDay, you’ll love this one.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/09/david-siegel-email_n_1951801.html
A sense of entitlement.
Much?
DW
Perhaps this revolt can be co-opted and turned into a “vote for Obama” movement. /s
I assume you’ve “checked” out the adverts that are recently bombarding this site, medicinecat?
“Sign up …!
Get started! …”
;~DW
The odd thing is… if the employers hiring standards are near the bottom of the barrel and the local economy is in the tank (local=most of the USA), there is no shortage of workers willing to start at $7 an hour. The people in Bentonville aren’t tearing their hair out, they’re smiling thinking of all those high wage-earners they’re gonna find some way to fire.
It’s a good thing these workers chose to do this now. If they had waited till after November 6, Obama probably would have sent the National Guard in to beat them.
I doubt that most workers are smart enough to know that the threat is meaningless. How much that miscreant pays in personal income tax has nothing to do with how many employees he keeps on the job. As long as the company thinks it is better off with the employees than without them, they will have a job. It’s very simple economics, but the right-wing propaganda machine tries to deny the simplest logic.
Oh, I’m sorry.
The president is too busy right now.
Too busy agreeing with Rmoney.
This is great news. Taxpayers should be all over this and glad to see it. Why, because it is taxpayers that have to pay Walmart workers food stamps, child care, and health care so their employer, Walmart, doesn’t’ have to pay them a living wage. It’s not our place to relieve Walmart from having to play labor costs and we damn well shouldn’t allow it. Further, we shouldn’t allow Walmart to use people this way. Waltons are nothing but slave drivers and we need to stop it now.