IMF managing director Christine Lagarde has been in the “stop the austerity” camp for a little while now, but this was perhaps her most explicit statement yet on the policy that’s gradually killing off Europe’s economy.
Ms Lagarde, IMF managing director, cautioned against countries front-loading spending cuts and tax increases. “It’s sometimes better to have a bit more time,” she said at the annual meetings of the IMF and the World Bank on Thursday [...]
The fund warned earlier this week that governments around the world had systematically underestimated the damage done to growth by austerity. Ms Lagarde said that, given this reassessment of the impact of fiscal consolidation on output, it was no longer sensible for governments in Europe to stick to budget deficit targets, should growth disappoint.
“It’s much more appropriate to apply the measures and let the [automatic] stabilisers operate,” Ms Lagarde said. Automatic stabilisers allow for the lower tax revenues and higher benefit payouts associated with a weak economy. “That applies to pretty much all the countries, particularly in the eurozone, that are applying that policy mix.”
Ms Lagarde also said struggling European countries such as Greece and Spain should be given more time to reduce their budget gaps. “That is what I have advocated for Portugal, this is what I have advocated for Spain, and this is what we are advocating for Greece, where I said repeatedly that an additional two years was necessary for the country actually to face the fiscal consolidation programme that is considered.”
Lagarde would not even encourage Spain to request a bailout, saying that was “up to Madrid.” The European Central Bank, a partner to the IMF in the European “troika,” definitely wants Spain to seek a bailout, and submit to conditions that would include more austerity and so-called labor market reforms that would take rights away from what workers remain employed in the country.
Privately, the IMF may want Spain to go ahead, and Lagarde did say she still favors the euphemistically titled reforms. But calling for more austerity would contrast with the rest of Lagarde’s statement, and indeed the findings the IMF put out earlier in the week. The IMF got a well-deserved reputation over the past couple decades for forcing weak countries into bad lending deals that included austerity programs. You could maybe call Lagarde’s reversal a deathbed conversion.
At this point, I’m happy for the company in the “stop the austerity” camp. I guess Lagarde couldn’t argue for more needless suffering when her own organization found in a research paper that austerity hurts more than it helps. But even while explicit, this is pretty soft – just don’t do more damage, and extend the austerity over a longer time horizon. Lagarde remains well within the orbit of the “responsible adults” who have taken a torch to the Eurozone and refuse to put out the fire.




16 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Pretty strong statement from Lagarde. I hope it has some impact on the policies of austerity that are in the pipeline for almost all European nations.
but where is the pleasure for the 1% if the 99% are not suffering?
Yep:) but talks cheap from anyone at imf
“But even while explicit, this is pretty soft – just don’t do more damage, and extend the austerity over a longer time horizon. Lagarde remains well within the orbit of the “responsible adults” who have taken a torch to the Eurozone and refuse to put out the fire.”
In Europe and America, statements like Lagarde’s, calling for an easing but not end to austerity, are the outer limit of permissible discourse for those in power. Paul Krugman has become almost a tragic figure. He wants so much to be a part of the establishment, yet adherence to his economic principles forces him to go outside the permitted boundaries set forth by the Austerians (as he terms them).
Krugman’s book must be having an effect on the IMF staff. It’s almost impossible to punch holes in his argument without lying.
The best long term situation for the people of Europe would be for the European Union to dissolve. It particularly amazes me how Eastern Europeans who had the boot of the Soviet Union on their necks for 50 years would voluntarily replace that boot with the boot of the successor organization, the EU. Centralization of power always means the destruction of sovereignty and freedom. Hopefully the current economic “crisis” will force the Europeans to wake up to this fact.
Centralization not always bad if the benefits enure to the masses but this centralization benefits only those who meet at Davros every year.
Heh… well tune in tonight, folks, to hear the latest update from the RMoney & DMoney lackies of our very own home-grown 1%. Who’ll whoop more austerity on our collective mooching 99% asses?? R-Ayn or Gaffey Joe?? Watch and decide. (Except not me. Not wasting my valuable time on a bunch of entitled white men lying to me. No thanks).
Highly unlikely that our own Overlords will be willing to listen Freedumb Fries Lagarde, especially if she’s not peddling austerity. No Sir!
You’re right as usual. LIke back in the days of the gladiators….ain’t no fun if you kill ALL of them.
They KEY is to make the 99% think things are geting better then yank the rug out from underneath them.
David, how the heck do you keep up with all the things you keep up with???
Second, what are we all gonna do after November?????
Oh, I almsot forgot, war with Syria.
Nevermind.
Madame
DefargeLagarde perhaps remembers 1789.TBS has a “My Name is Earl” marathon. And, just in case, “How It’s Made” features sobmreros, marbles, toaster pastries and snow blowers.
Those were the good ol’ days when corrupt politicians met the guillotine, up close and personal.
We all seem to know that austerity can’t work and we all seem to know that the PTB/Motu are going full steam ahead with austerity so what will happen after this is clear to even the most wool headed 1%er? Stock market crash worldwide? I am curious what others here think will happen.
Lagarde, who makes 6 figures without paying taxes along with other outrageous perks unavailable to the 99%, is a criminal buffoon no matter her recent come to jesus moment on austerity. Sure, her rhetoric may have some small conciliatory effect, but she and the motherfuckers at the IMF have already done the major damage, which they INTENDED all along and she is clearly looking to cover her malicious, evil ass.
Austerity is the heart of structural adjustment,and one would need to stink with either stupidity or ignorance to believe it will continue to be the core of the neoliberal agenda Legarde was basically saying” ease up on our scheme so we can spare this eurocrisis from imminent collapse and then propel austerity for leveraging privatization with long-trm legs
Worldwide economic collapse means even more monopoly consolidation and hence wealth concentration.With infiniteQE ,obviously collapse will devalue debt via hyperinflation and those who are near thee press will prosper via wholesale money.Gresham’s law full spectrum .