Vikram Pandit, the CEO of Citigroup, who presided over some of the worst years in the history of the bank, abruptly stepped down today. He will be replaced by longtime Citi executive Michael Corbat. Here’s Pandit’s statement:
Thanks to the dedication and sacrifice of people across Citigroup, we have emerged from the financial crisis as a strong institution. Citigroup is well-positioned for continued profitability and growth, having refocused the franchise on the basics of banking. Given the progress we have made in the last few years, I have concluded that now is the right time for someone else to take the helm at Citigroup. I could not be leaving the Company in better hands. Mike is the right person to tackle the difficult challenges ahead, with a 29-year record of achievement and leadership at this Company. I will truly miss the wonderful people throughout this organization. But I know that together with Mike they will continue to build on the progress we have made.
I would amend that to read “Thanks to the largesse of the American people, who through the Federal Reserve and Treasury poured cash into our company like it was a bottomless chili bowl, we have emerged from the financial crisis as a strong institution.” Sheila Bair talks in her book about how the extraordinary financial measures taken during the crisis appeared to be designed almost entirely for the benefit of Citigroup. The powerful alumni of the company included former CEO Robert Rubin, whose proteges litter the Obama Administration.
Pandit did well by the executives to call in all those favors. The shareholders, not so much. Citi stock is 88% below the peak from when Pandit first came into the CEO chair. The stock is up 1.77% on the news of Pandit’s resignation. I think they understand how the past few years have gone.
Corbat ran European and Middle East operations for Citi. The company also needs a new President, as John Havens has resigned.
Shareholders rejected Pandit’s $15 million compensation package in a non-binding vote earlier this year. Maybe Pandit got the message that he wasn’t entirely well-liked.
But he probably won’t head right from the boardroom to the bread line, I suspect.
Photo by World Economic Forum under Creative Commons license





12 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Wasn’t he under the protection of Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal? I remember that weird interview with the Prince during the financial crisis when he pumped a huge amount of money into Citi and said Pandit was his guy. But there was some scrapping between them in 2010 I think, when the Prince told Pandit he had 2 years to perform:
http://www.forbes.com/2010/01/23/pandit-citi-honeymoon-intelligent-investing-alwaleed.html
I guess he didn’t feel he was getting his money’s worth?
What kind of platinum severance package did Pandit get to, uh, walk away?? These entitled 1%ers never ever under any circumstances whatsover have to leave with no money, no money, no money like you & I would if we were abject failures in our respective jobs (that is, if we are “lucky” enough to have one these days).
Inquiring minds need to know.
Buh-bye Pandit. Hope the door slammed hard on your big ass when you walked out. Sadly it’s probably a revolving door, and Pandit will secure some other financially rewarding “job” in no time. These shits always do well, no matter what.
He’ll chair the fed under Obama in the 2nd term…
Wouldn’t surprise me. Then YOU and I get to pay for Pandit’s platinum health care benefits and a platinum pension (which nowadays apparently only the 1% should get taxpayer funded pensions… certainly not the lazy mofo peons who pretend to “work” in -shriek horror – public service “jobs”) for life.
Saw-weet!
Perhaps some diligent investigative reporter will uncover Mr. Pandit’s severance package.
I’ll bet upwards of $20 million.
Ridiculous Kris. UNless Bernanke strokes out.
Secretary of Treasury. Cards already being printed.
I thought of you when I glanced at this article yesterday:
http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/2012/11/formula-one-racing-comes-to-america
It seems that, as NASCAR declines (due to a dwindling middle & working class most likely, who no longer have the dispoable income to go the races), Formula 1 may be making a come-back amongst the wealthy set.
I’m pretty clueless about the differences between the styles auto racing, but I thought you might find the article of some interest. Maybe Pandit will be heading off to the next Formula 1 Race now that he’s “retired”??
A “savvy businessman” like Pandit will land on his feet. I would not be surprised if he lands an admin job.
o/t but NBC also outbid SpeedTV for the rights to broadcast. They did such a swell job with the Olympics, I’m sure it will be an improvement over Speed…/s.
IIRC, wasn’t citigroup also the organization that benefited from some retroactive legislation blessing some kind of illegal merger in the 1990′s???
Excellent translation.
We have formula 1 in Montreal. Brings in the celebs, super-rich and their groupies once a year. Hotels and cabbies love it. The rest of us, not so much.