Tim McDonnell has a good, depressing piece on the wind power industry scrambling to extend the production tax credit, and the carnage that will face the industry if they fail. This has been turned into an electoral issue because of the prominence of the industry in swing states like Iowa and Colorado, and because Mitt Romney has taken a rare stand against the tax credit, in contrast to the Obama Administration’s desire for an extension. But I think the more important thing to stress here is how our industrial policy, as it were, particularly on energy, is so detrimental.
The oil and gas industry never worries about any of their tax credits expiring. They may have to fend off those who want to cancel them, but given that the expected state of Congress is a state of gridlock, they benefit when nothing happens. By contrast, the wind industry – and solar as well – has seen these perpetual sunsets on its tax credits. As energy is a space with a considerable amount of long-term planning, this just ruins the business plan. They experience these boom-and-bust cycles that stunt innovation and growth, as can be seen in the above chart. “Every few years the industry has to drop everything for six or nine months and focus exclusively on having the credit passed,” says one industry professional. This is terrible. If certainty matters at all, it matters with long-term projects like shifting the energy mix.
Now there’s a school of thought that says that government should not be in the business of giving tax breaks to any industry, or preferring any industry over another. And that’s fine to say. But the status quo is the worst of all possible worlds: a halting industrial policy for those new industry players with the least power, and a subsidy regime for legacy energy. Whether your tax favorability or subsidy expires depends on the prominence of your lobbyists. Just look at ethanol, which has been crucial in electoral politics since the 1980s, and therefore has permanent mandates that they fight to keep from being overturned, rather than the wind and solar fight to extend their favorability.
You can envision a time where this tax credit could be phased out, and maybe that’s the way to extend it, with conditionality based on market share. But clearly this disrupts the wind energy industry so much that it makes no sense to continue on this path.





5 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
in my (not very humble) opinion, that school of thought is flawed, the government must promote industry that it needs to exist but will perish without support
that support must evaporate as soon as the industry is healthy
If there was a true level playing field, or if, somehow, there were absolutely NO tax cuts, tax loopholes, tax incentives for all the “extractors” of various natural resources, such as Oil, Gas, Coal, various Minerals, etc, PLUS the lack or very very tiny Royalties that these “Bigs” do/not pay back to US citizens (for OUR natural resources)… why then it’s *likely* that sustainable energy production, such as wind & solar, might well become much more cost-effective and sustaining than the rest.
What most US citizens are woefully ignorant about is exactly how little most of the “extractors” pay for the resources they mine/drill/dig out/whatever. In fact, mostly YOU and I are PAYING TWICE for these resources – 1) give the poor poor benighted pauper-stricken Big’s, like BigOil & BigCoal, our tax dollars to DO their job, and 2) pay to purchase what we need from them, such as gas at the pump, electricity, etc.
Sure sustainable “green” energies are struggling. Why wouldn’t they? They don’t get the same very very good DEAL that the BigBoyz do. And believe me, the BigBoyz fight tooth ‘n nail to make sure that sustainable energy companies aren’t successful.
YOUR tax dollar at work…
And that’s not even getting into the environmental impact angle.
Some years ago, there were a couple of Exxon shareholder initiatives trying to push the top brass of Exxon to begin investing in sustainable energy, in addition to it’s traditional BigOil drilling/production.
The notion was that Exxon would be a more diverse company better able to compete in a changing economic and environmental world/climate/whatever.
Of course, time after time these shareholder initiatives, which had pretty broad support, were shot down in flames. Pretty stupid & short-sighted, if you ask me.
But of course, the 1% are guided solely & only by their only greedy stupidity. Anyone who tries to tell you what great “business acumen” they have is full of it. These companies make big buck$ bc they’ve gamed the system. The end.
yes to 2, and 3.
it just dawned on me that since nuclear plants are clearly not likely to be any threat to oil companies and coal, there is no attack on them.
so those subsidies are in no danger.
The attacks are Just the help for the one thing we need, and the one thing that will actually work.