Everyone’s linking to this New York Times op-ed about how government’s importance is magnified in the midst of natural disasters.
FEMA, created by President Jimmy Carter, was elevated to cabinet rank in the Bill Clinton administration, but was then demoted by President George W. Bush, who neglected it, subsumed it into the Department of Homeland Security, and placed it in the control of political hacks. The disaster of Hurricane Katrina was just waiting to happen.
The agency was put back in working order by President Obama, but ideology still blinds Republicans to its value. Many don’t like the idea of free aid for poor people, or they think people should pay for their bad decisions, which this week includes living on the East Coast.
Over the last two years, Congressional Republicans have forced a 43 percent reduction in the primary FEMA grants that pay for disaster preparedness. Representatives Paul Ryan, Eric Cantor and other House Republicans have repeatedly tried to refuse FEMA’s budget requests when disasters are more expensive than predicted, or have demanded that other valuable programs be cut to pay for them. The Ryan budget, which Mr. Romney praised as “an excellent piece of work,” would result in severe cutbacks to the agency, as would the Republican-instigated sequester, which would cut disaster relief by 8.2 percent on top of earlier reductions.
Rick Perlstein actually took a look at this five years ago, on the anniversary of the man-made flood caused by Hurricane Katrina. Basically, the rule of thumb is that under Republican Administrations, FEMA gets stacked with cronies and hacks, and their effectiveness suffers as a result. Then a Democratic Administration takes over, and FEMA gets restored. And back, and forth. This goes back to at least the 1980s. And considering the desire to either move emergency management to the states or privatize it on the part of Mitt Romney, we can expect this dynamic to continue.
Chris Christie, presiding over a blue state and up for re-election next year, said through gritted teeth that the response to the storm at the federal level has been “outstanding.”
Whatever the failings of political leadership on both sides of the aisle, there’s still a residual belief in the validity of government on the Democratic side that simply does not exist on the Republican side. In times like this, where the effects of FIRE sector lobbying doesn’t come into play, you see that difference in the proper role of government shine through. In order for this to become definitive, however, all government programs have to show the same diligence and dedication. One program like HAMP can wipe out years of proper actions in organizations like FEMA.
Photo by MTAPhotos under Creative Commons License





5 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Privatize all rescue, salvage, and recovery!
Want a secure place to stay during the tempest? $300 a night, or you can sleep in the street.
Sell bottled water for $50 a gallon!
Want your power turned back on? A $1000 dollar deposit will be required.
The cost for the stability and protection from looting that the National Guard used to provide, will be something akin to a surgeon’s fee, per private, armed, corporate goon. No community bond posted? They’ll pile into their trucks and leave you to “clockwork orange”.
I can hardly wait.
Your post would be funnier if they weren’t actually doing that.
http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/30/opinion/kayyem-obama-sandy/index.html
>>
ooops!
looks like Obama luvs privatization re:investment bank idea -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Infrastructure_Reinvestment_Bank
“Barack Obama backed the proposed legislation in February 2008 and repeated his call in September 2010, although he did not provide specifics about how the Bank should operate. In 2008, Obama suggested that the Bank would borrow US$60 billion of federal funding to invest in infrastructure over 10 years, while leveraging “up to $500 billion” of private investment”
- -looks like rockin’ obama just can’t do anything unless a component ensures free money to private parties (read:future employers) .. yes he is a sellout
maybe he should be advised of this one, which exists already >>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_of_North_Dakota
“The Bank of North Dakota (BND) is a state-owned and -run financial institution based in Bismarck, North Dakota. Under state law the bank is the State of North Dakota doing business as the Bank of North Dakota.”
giving handouts to private parties or allowing the greedy and unpatriotic FIRE sector to cream a slice off of EVERY govt project is not a republican idea – its not a democratic idea …
>its a bankers idea that the O man is right on board with ..
I don’t know where you came up with the “through gritted teeth” remark about Christie’s comments on Obama’s response to the emergency. I saw the video of the broadcast, and “gritted teeth” wasn’t on the menu — Christie was quite open in his praise for the president and FEMA.
His dismissal of Romney, even though oblique, was nice, though.
He looked pretty gleeful to me, too.
Things that make you go Hmmmm….