I saw some liberals getting excited about this New York Times description of a nationwide health insurance plan that they cleverly tried to posit as the by-product of the public option.
The nationwide plans would get contracted out by the federal government and be available to consumers in the insurance exchanges. National plans, government-run? Sounds like a public option, right?
Well, no. Multi-state health plans will be made available to exchange recipients. But they will merely be contracted out by the federal government, and run by a private insurance company. This was devised as an admittedly weak substitute to the public option, and nobody who actually understands the Affordable Care Act is presuming that this is in any way the same deal.
These plans are not, however, actual public options. “This is not government-sponsored, and it’s not a public plan,” says Tim Jost, a law professor at Washington and Lee University who focuses on health policy. “These are plans that contract with the federal government.” [...]
No one at the time, however, thought the multi-state plan would work much like a public option at all. “It’s not really similar at all,” says McDonough, now a professor at the Harvard University School of Public Health. “It’s something that’s going to be more like one private plan choice.”
One of the two plan administrators has to technically be not-for-profit, but then again, so is Blue Cross. The plans look more like the Republican vision for the health insurance market, the sale of insurance policies “across state lines,” more than anything. They may create “competition” for the existing plans within an exchange by simply evading regulations under state laws. If the nationwide plans get enough subscribers, they may bargain providers down on rates, which could lower the cost of health care. But more likely, they would merely offer bare-bones insurance that doesn’t have to comply with the same requirements as other exchange participants. Therefore they will look like a good deal for consumers, while actually being junk insurance that doesn’t offer the same benefits as the other plans. The nationwide plans have some criteria, and the feds must sign off on some of their framework, but there’s ample room here for a nationwide provider to deliver fairly useless insurance at a low price and make a good profit.
The need to offer a substitute to placate those desiring a public option created this Frankenstein monster, which was admittedly not well thought-out. Those who did it ended up with the worst of all possible worlds; no public option supporter really even knew about these multi-state plans, and they have the potential to disrupt the exchanges and cause a race to the bottom.
As long as we’re in hurricane mode, I’ll quote George W. Bush by saying: “Heckuva job.”
Photo by Jeffrey Beall under Creative Commons license






26 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Everything coming out of D.C. shows a serious lack of leadership and this is one more example. Ya know Solomon was never going to cut the baby in half but I don’t think our leaders get his wisdom. Sometimes half a loaf is better than none but half a baby?
What reason is there to believe this will be low-cost junk insurance any more than the average plan on the exchanges?
This is nothing more than a re-branding of insurance that would probably be sold in the state anyway. In fact the insurer should pay the government a license fee to use the “U.S.” name, but that would give up the game that’s being played here.
“… a race to the bottom.”
How appropriate: no dollar left behind.
Although it is “balanced”, in a sense, with “The race to the top”.
The “top” to “race” is a cynical educational sop.
Why might we imagine anything “less” with a “new public option”, that ain’t?
Abominable “care” … acting.
Thank you, DDay, for speaking the truth, for not being a cheerleader of partisan deceit.
DW
Yep, race to the bottom to see which state the insurers cherry-pick as their base to avoid those pesky regulations. We know that Delaware and South Dakota are the havens of choice for unregulated banks and usurious credit cards, who gets the windfall of “screw the insured” insurers building fancy new HQs there, to establish “residence”? Is it Utah’s turn? I forget.
Hell in a handbasket, a continuing story. Welcome to modern America.
More change we can believe in. Clap, clap.
Are you telling me the French, Canadians, and New Zealanders can come up with a fair and equitable national healthcare system and WE CAN’T?
There must be a “fly in the ointment, a monkey in the wrench” somewhere.
John McCain, Die Hard
French, Canadians, and New Zealanders aren’t free.
Here, here. “All for one, and all for one.”
Lemme look into that. French, maybe. But the Kiwis and Canucks, I’m pretty sure they think they are. :-)
… X 2
Well, we were told ACA was “just the beginning.” I guess we should just bend over and spread ‘em again.
“no dollar left behind”
If that’s an original, DW, it’s a beaut. Repeat worthy–and I shall, if it’s all right with you.
We are in the final days of this election season. The bullshit will be nonstop.
Those governments see there citizens as something more than “marks” to be fleeced.
The “starter home” is underwater, no help here.
Far as I know, liberalarts, it just popped out of me mind when I wrote it.
That being the case, make of it whatever you will.
;~DW
You might just be right there. We’ll need a change in philosophy to get a good nationwide healthcare system. Expecting that from the 537 nimrods in Washington might just be a tough row to hoe.
I think that quote belongs to Jack Benny. But, I’m not sure.
He is the one famous for:
Mugger: “Your money or your life”.
Benny: “Hmmmmm”
Mugger: “Well???”
Benny: “Hang on, I’m thinking.”
Oooh! A new shade of lipstick for the PPACA pig!
I think “public option” should be a mere stepping stone to single payer, and ultimately single payer / single source.
“Not attainable,” say my well meaning friends who are relieved they got ACA instead of nothing at all. Whew!
By that logic the US never built the most powerful military the world has ever known, either.
This is just a pre-election sop to try to win over some of us “effin retards” in the last days before the election.
Too late.
A) I wasn’t buyin’ it in the first place; didn’t look like a PO to me. (Thanks, DDay)
B) Too late; I already voted for Anderson.
PO was the Obama-Pelosisnake’s bait in the first place,anything about PO, ask
directly to president Obama,should have any questions ask Obama.
I remember Obama talking about PO on TV, people were happy and like PO,all of the sudden,total silence,Obama-Pelosisnake sold out people to big insurers.
I don’t think it was a very smart move for them to remind us all of that marathon at this stage – I mean ‘new New Deal’ has something going for it, but ‘new public option’? All around the mulberry bush, the monkey chased the weasel, the monkey thought t’was all in fun…POP goes the weasel.
No, doesn’t really do the trick.
Oh, and on the subject of freedom, I haven’t heard of any French, Canadian, or New Zealand citizens losing their homes because of overwhelming medical bills. Jill Stein makes the point that Rombamacare does not guarantee that freedom.
Among a few other things, of course.
Well, this news comes as quite a surprise!
Out of right field.
But, by no means let us allow the perfect to become the enemy of the enema.
This is the result of not focusing on making every seat in Congress a likely Democratic win in every State.
When FDR failed to get a national health care plan, he had 70-80% of Congress Democratic plus progressive Republicans.
Obama got a lot from a Congress that was minority progressive.