New York is slowly recovering from the damaging floodwaters and winds of Superstorm Sandy. And what we’re seeing in the aftermath is how the burden natural disasters invariably falls on the shoulders of those least equipped to cope. Nowithstanding the human interest stories about trying to find an outlet to charge cell phones, the real victims of this storm are old, disabled and/or poor. They represent the majority of those still without power. They live in the areas more likely to be inaccessible to rescue efforts. They are among the 250,000 trapped in the dark in Manhattan. They are the ones most at risk of disease and illness.
As David Rohde writes, the storm exposed the yawning inequality gap in one of the richest cities in the world.
Sandy humbled every one of the 19 million people in the New York City metropolitan area. But it humbled some more than others in an increasingly economically divided city [...]
Those with a car could flee. Those with wealth could move into a hotel. Those with steady jobs could decline to come into work. But the city’s cooks, doormen, maintenance men, taxi drivers and maids left their loved ones at home.
New census data shows that the city is the most economically divided it has been in a decade, according to the New York Times. As has occurred across the country, the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer. Twenty-one percent of the city is in poverty, and the median household income decreased by $821 annually. Per the Times: “Median income for the lowest fifth was $8,844, down $463 from 2010. For the highest, it was $223,285, up $1,919.”
Manhattan, the city’s wealthiest and most gentrified borough, is an extreme example. Inequality here rivals parts of sub-Saharan Africa. Last year the wealthiest 20 percent of Manhattan residents made $391,022 a year on average, according to census data. The poorest 20 percent made $9,681.
Think Namibia for inequality statistics like that. Think Sierra Leone. And this gap becomes most visible in a time of crisis.
Lots of things must get fixed in New York to prepare for the new reality of global warming-fueled disasters. The city must bulk up its infrastructure and create more barriers to storm surges. But the economic makeup of the city must get fixed as well. The people who make New York City run do not deserve to live they way they must when disaster strikes. They don’t deserve their everyday life, either.




21 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
While I, of course, agree with this, until the capitalist class perceives a real threat to the capitalist system atop which they are perched will the lives of the poor improve in any tangible sense. Until such a threat emerges, they will always claim that it can’t be afforded and, balderdash though it is, that will suffice as a pretext for more bottom-to-top wealth transfer.
First off let me say this as someone who lives on the S.Jersey coast and just lived through and is still living through Sandy. This was NOT a Superstorm except in size. It was a Cat. 1 Hurricane that made landfall right over my house! We stayed in our home since we are 15 ft. above sea level and the storm tides never really got that close to our house. For many others they weren’t that lucky. Even at that most of the damage was just that flooding of basements and in some cases first floors. Power was lost here for 3 days. We were prepared from long decades of living through many powerful coastal storms. We had a pantry stocked and we had water and hot water as our Gas line didn’t get cut off. We had preps if it was. We had a grill and a fireplace with lots of dry wood just in case. For three days we lived in a version of the 19th century with cell phs. partially working think 1905. We had hot water a huge thing, no heat so we used our gas stove top to heat the downstairs up a bit. We had lots of clothing and wore layers, along the coast the ocean is till in the 60′s so it wasn’t all that cold except at nite last evening as colder air was in the area. All in all I enjoyed the endless cable tv and internet news and read a a book and tried to relax. 99 % of the people had evacuated, so no real emergency existed we could see. Nevertheless, the media hyped the living crap out of this creating a sense of panic in many people. 61 people died mostly by trees falling on their homes inland and getting electrocuted by downed power lines and just being outside during the storm. Awful and I feel terrible for them and their families, but 50 mil. people live in the Northeastern US, so what statistically does that add up to? Was it a Super storm like Katrina that was a Cat 5 and came on the beach as a Cat 3? NO, we had lots of warning and 99% % of this is property damage mostly to people’s second homes at least in coastal NJ. In NYC it was a lot worse and effected many more poor people. We had better get used to these kinds of storm because the future is going to be increasingly filled with them according to many climate scientists.
Have thought about you and yours during the storm. Glad to hear that all is okay.
Yeah…none of that will help for long. At the rate the icecaps are melting, it’s probably best just to abandon the city and mover inland.
glad you were safe
Oh seaglass, I’m sooo glad to hear you checking in. I’ve been wondering how you and your family have fared. Glad to hear you’d prepared well enough and that you’re all fine!
My nephew is in the Dumbo neighborhood of Brooklyn that got badly flooded. He said the water stopped a block away from his apartment building.
A friend in Nassau County on Long Island said they’re still without electricity and she’s cold. And she’s very grateful that no water came in her house and that her house is fine.
Inequality has been worse the past three years than the previous eight:
Growth of Income Inequality Is Worse Under Obama than Bush « naked capitalism
You forgot the super-wealthy. Based on the number of private jets I saw at the Executive Airport today, they came south to visit Mickey.
Let all Democraqts THINK back to Obama’s first 2 years as President. He had a veto-proof Congress and what did he do with it? Did he do ANYTHING to address the inequality we face? He now says it takes a long time to turn the economy around and we should trust him with another term. I probably would if he didn’t manage to make the Banks whole at the great expense to the people who voted for him. How was he able to turn the Banks around so quickly? Simple, he gave them TRILLIONS, no real strings attached, to play with. What did he do for the people who elected him? He turns on that phony act and lies to us, over and over again.
How can ANY Democrat vote for a “Democrat” who promises to cut Social Security? How can ANY Democrat vote for a “Democrat” who promises to cut Medicare? How can ANYONE, least of all a “Progressive” believe anything aout this Presidential election is “silly”.
Glad to hear you were safe.
One of the recent problems with the saffir-simpson scale of categorizing hurricanes according to wind speed is the fact that such categories increasingly do not reflect the severity of the storm surge.
Sandy’s storm surge, at least in New York Harbor, was estimated more nearly like a high cat. 2 storm. Last August’s Isaac in south Louisiana also caused near cat. 3 type flooding, though it too was a cat. 1.
And Katrina as you say was a cat. 3 storm when it came ashore in Mississippi. But it’s storm surge was far higher than Hurricane Camille which had sustained winds of 180 mph when it landed.
I do recall that some of the warnings about Sandy included an unexpectedly high storm surge which I think accounted for some of the “super” characterization. That, in addition to its geographical size and the fact that it was reported to have the lowest barometric pressure ever recorded north of Cape Hatteras.
Okay, vote for Rmoney and see if you get anything better then.
Why not vote for Jill Stein, Rocky Anderson, Gary Johnson? Obama is the WORST “Democratic Party” President ever. Maybe if Obama loses the Dems in the Senate will act like Dems. and we’ll get a candidate in 2012 (Sherrod Brown, Elizabeth Warren?) who will believe and fight for what Obama promised in ’08?
For me it’s easy, I REFUSE to vote for ANY Democrat who promises to cut Social Security and Medicare.
Inequality gaps in the U.S.??? Shocked I tell you, shocked!!!
Not bad choices but Bernie Sanders might be the only one that can prevent a revolution. Perhaps a transitory President ala Kerensky before the people finally storm Congress, corporate headquarters and the offices of the propagandistic corporate media.
Prostrate yourself before the Obama idol on your mantel. He needs you now more than ever.
Romney is not the only other candidate running.
Besides voting third party, any specific suggestions on what to do about the vast inequality in Manhattan and the U.S. in general?
A secretary of business is what we need to sort through this whole inequality fiasco. Barack Obama is such a forward-thinking, can-do guy. Man, I’d really like to sit down and have a beer with the guy.
Is this the same massive inequality revealed by Katrina in New Orleans? I wondered where that got to.
Sorry, but for me not even for dog catcher.