Rebuilding the East Coast after Superstorm Sandy will be an expensive proposition. A new estimate of the cost of the storm now reaches $50 billion, and just protecting New York City from future disasters through the use of a seawall and other barriers would tack on another $15 billion, though that money would be as well spent as any you can devise. (It would also make far more economic sense than a campaign to “fix the debt”).
But anyone who watches the underrated HBO series Treme understands that, in the aftermath of a life-changing event like a hurricane and flood, the shock doctrine starts to factor in. All of a sudden, developers see their chance to hollow out the undergrowth and remake cities and towns in an image that means more private profits for them. We’re already starting to see talk of this in places like the Philly Inquirer:
Rebuilding the shattered Shore and the swamped New York tunnels, along with badly needed updates to the Northeast’s exhausted roads and rails, will be an opportunity to implement streamlined construction laws backed by Republicans and pro-business Democrats in Congress and the states, says Frank Rapoport, Berwyn-based partner at New York law firm McKenna Long & Aldridge L.L.P., and counselor to contractors who support “public-private partnerships” (P3).
That’s a label for a group of strategies that replace lengthy government-led construction with private contractors and financiers, financed by “sharing” user fees – like road tolls – once the project is built, instead of borrowing money and charging taxpayers….
P3 funding – which Corbett’s predecessor, Democrat Ed Rendell, also supported and has continued to champion in his part-time retirement gig as an investment banker for Greenhill & Co. – is coming along “just in time” to aid in Sandy reconstruction, Rapoport says. Virginia is pushing a high-profile, privately run, toll-funded expansion of I-495 that P3 backers call a model. Pennsylvania “is following Virginia and Texas” in pushing privately run public projects, he added. Cash-strapped Puerto Rico is using P3 projects “for everything from bridges to schools.
The right-wing governors in Pennsylvania and New Jersey and the pro-business New Democrat Andrew Cuomo in New York will be all too happy to facilitate privatization in these projects. There could be billions of dollars sloshing around in these different projects. Chris Christie is already talking about a “faster storm recovery”, which includes taking a week of vacation away from public schools. No word yet on selling public infrastructure, but that’s probably on the menu.
Yves Smith notes that these deals, which government seek to quickly fill gaps in their funding, often come with hidden implications that ramp up the costs. They should be entered into, if at all, with the utmost scrutiny. But emergency response tends to put the focus on speed over diligence.





15 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Is anyone in New Jersey planning to form a branch of Common Ground Relief?
Yes. As we gazed on the photos of Obama and Christie together I asked my wife, “What is the mystery? What is everyone so shocked they get along? They have a great deal in common.” Starting with their basic views of governance and economics.
Very good clip from Treme. I agree that the series is underestimated and if I had to guess, I’d say it’s going to age like a fine wine. As Copland said about his music way back in the day, “Give them time. They’ll come around.”
Every gangster on the eastern seaboard is already trying to jam his way to the front of the pack, hands grabbing wildly in an effort to ensure the receipt of plenty of that sweet, government cash. What is it about “profit-motivated” that average people don’t get as it relates to these kinds of situations? It ain’t rocket science to conclude that putting an avaricious private entity between the ATM and the cleanup efforts is going to mean that an inordinate chunk of that money will end up in someone’s pocket rather than as part of the job. So stupid on so many levels.
The Wire was incredible. Just don’t know if I can TAKE Treme.
I remember reading that when the FBI raided the home of a mafia Don they had been investigating, they found a diary next to his bed where he was recording/following the progress of legislation deregulating the Savings and Loan industry.
It seems the mafia had tons of bogus commercial real-estate deals just waiting for the the moment the government would give the green light to S&Ls to finance commercial development.
It seems there is no place in the list of possible/probable government spending where the criminals haven’t somehow found their way to the front of the line.
Privatization is a euphemism for politicians collusion with criminals to rip off the people.
The Wire was incredible.
Yup.
This is certainly what has happened in New Orleans and the Mississippi coastal regions.
Soon we will all be living in little Disney fabricated towns with names like Stepford.
Money talks!
How/why conservatives and so-called libertarians don’t “get” that this is essentially a rip off is beyond me. Are government run programs blameless, pure and always fantastic? No, there’s waste and graft in gov’t programs, too, but far less than in the vaunted private sector, which is ONLY & ALWAYS looking to make a profit. It stands to reason that those wanting to *make a buck off of suffering* aren’t going to be particularly charitable.
Why this isn’t *evident* to most citizens is beyond me, other than, per usual the corp-owned propoganda wurlitzer has done it’s usual nefariously effective job of mesmerizing the bulk of the populace.
sigh…
Of course Sandy will be used as an “excuse” to go futher down the road to even more corporate
plunder of the public cofferspower and control.When you buy food to avoid starvation, is someone making a buck off of your suffering? What if someone takes money to build you a house that prevents your freezing to death in winter? Do you really think the essential things of life will be better provided if no one has a profit motive? I’ll never understand where people get the idea that profit is evil. Where do you think your paycheck comes from?
Your assumptions are simplistic. Services that provide necessities differ in all aspects from services and products that provide entertainment. Necessities are beyond price. The provider and the one in need must settle on a price that the one in need can afford and one that will provide for the providers own needs. Profit is for greed and entertainment.
Is there a clip from Treme in the post? Or a link? I’m not seeing one.
I couldn ‘t takr the Wiire! Maybe my ties to Baltimore made it hit yoo close to home , buy I just found it too too sad and painful to watch much (on tape.no HBO) .
Getting rich selling diamond watches or beachfront villas is different from getting rich selling penicillin to someone who is about to die without it. Or from throwing a life preserver to a drowning person.
I responded along similar lines before I saw your post.
In truth, I’m not sure why either of us thought our response would matter, though.
P.S. Paychecks don’t come from profits. Paychecks are part of the cost of delivering goods or services.
Paychecks are an operating expense of a business (and tax deductible). Profit is what the owners of a business get to keep if revenues exceed operating expenses and taxes.
Government cuts many paychecks, but not from profits. Ditto not for profit organizations.
I’m surprised that a big fan of the private sector would make a mistake about something basic.