Former House Speakers don’t typically spend a lot of time in Congress after their ouster. Nancy Pelosi felt she had a chance, aided by the coattails of the President, to win back the House in 2012. It turns out that the Democrats picked up, if all the current too-close-to-call races hold, eight seats. Key states were gerrymandered so badly, so this was a much better feat than commonly realized (if you believe that redistricting added 11 seats naturally into the Republican column, then on an apples-to-apples comparison Democrats picked up 19 seats, roughly equivalent to their gains in the wave year of 2008).
Still and all, Democrats came up 17 seats short, and they face the prospect of an unfavorable map bedeviling them from returning to the majority, potentially for the next four cycles. So it’s only natural that Pelosi, who after all is 72, would consider stepping down.
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi will meet with top Democrats on Tuesday night — followed by another leadership-only session early Wednesday as she prepares for a meeting with all House Democrats — but it is still unclear whether she will stay or go after nearly a decade in power [...]
“When I see my caucus, I will discuss it with them in the beginning of this week rather than discuss it with rumor in Washington,” Pelosi told the reporters. “I will make that announcement to my caucus. I know that we’re best friends and all, but I think that I will share that with them first.”
Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who wants to be a future Speaker in her own right, said she would be shocked if Pelosi stepped down, but I suspect she doesn’t mean that. As I said, former Speakers don’t really have fun hanging out in the minority waiting for a return to power. Maybe Pelosi’s different, and her fundraising prowess certainly makes her an asset. But I wouldn’t blame her for wanting to leave.
Talk of succession is premature, but Steny Hoyer has been planted in line for quite a while now. The ideological makeup of the caucus has shifted away from Hoyer – there are now only 14 Blue Dogs left, believe it or not – but Hoyer rose to the top of the caucus leadership on relationships rather than ideology. Chris Van Hollen or Wasserman Schultz could challenge Hoyer, but they’ll more likely bide their time.
A House Democratic caucus with Hoyer in charge rather than Pelosi just necessarily focuses on different things. And while this matters less in the minority, it would definitely represent an ideological move to the center, despite an election that moved the caucus to the left.




19 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Pelosi, Hoyer, Bozo the Clown — makes no difference.
Debbie Wasserman Schultz? That “all in” Zionist who denies the existence of a “kill list”. That one? I shouldn’t be surprised.
Hoyer, 73, is older than Pelosi, if that matters.
The Democratic Party just keeps moving to the right, and so voting for it only encourages this move.
Here is the likely short list. Weep. Get angry. Or whatever.
Nancy Pelosi, former Speaker and current majority leader
Steny Hoyer, former majority leader and current whip
James Clyburn, former whip and current assistant leader
John Larson, caucus chair
Xavier Bercerra, caucus vice-chair
Debby Wasserman-Schultz – DNC chair
Steve Israel – DCCC chair
Chris Van Hollen – former DCCC chair
Bingo,they know that folks are beginning to get to hip to the scam,
so the next move is to trot someone else out as someone who has empathy for ordinary Americans.
Don’t worry you can bet this very rich congress person that they will present to you really cares about you & your family’s plight.
Won’t surprise me non,if they put Clyburn as the guy,remember you had the first Woman Speaker so now to keep the Kabuki rolling they might just go with the first AA speaker.
It won’t make a damn bit of difference,it’s just window dressing.We will still be screwed.
It’s always darkest just before it goes pitch black.
Neither one of these individuals is worth the price of bus fare to drive them out of town.
This bit of news should be placed high in the pantheon of Who gives a shit information.
Never been a real Pelosi fan but Hoyer is a horrible choice.
Sometimes I feel like the Dems just crystalized in the late 90s and wont change until all these fossils die off. (case in point, dragging Bob Kerrey back to what ever fly over state he ran in, never a thought for something fresh)
Hoyer is worse. I think much of what DWS says is just lip service
OH GAWD…not Steny Hoyer or Chris Van Hollen! Even Wasserman Schultz is a step down from Pelosi. Hoyer and Van Hollen would be more than glad to piss on the Democratic base and sell their should to the highest bidder on any subject under the sun. Stay on Nancy…we need you now more than ever!
call your local democrats
Grayson for leader
they are there to do what we say
tell them will vote em out next time
is it we the people or
them the right wing corporatists
It was time for her to take a break. Her job is a lot tougher than any Senator’s. As to her replacement , he or she will be herding cats, and there will be a Grayson faction to contend with. Didn’t know Hoyer was so old. That’s actually good news. This is going to be a long hard pull, but I think over two election cycles the Progressives are going to be a lot stronger and certainly better defended against the leadership’s strong-arm tactics. You think they have any leverage on Grayson. He won that seat on his own. The more reps we have in that situation, the stronge the Liberal caucus is.
14 blue dogs left in the House that is news how many did they have max ?
Who is the biggest block in the House that has disciplined members? The Tea Party for example has shown that a group willing to attack any who disagrees with them can influence who ever wins the House leadership. Who has raised the most money for Dem House Members? That is the Person who will likely win unless they like Steny have declining support.
Its money and or popular support that wins these things.
Pelosi refused to set up the catfood commission. She will probably oppose TPP. She probably does not want to be “leader” of the betrayal of the people when these 2 items come through for the congressional stamp of approval.
She will be remembered as one of the most effective Speakers of the House legislatively despite Senate, WH, DOJ, military, and judicial obstruction.
Stepping down might free her to be a loyal opposition; and maybe even join the progressive branch. Go, Nancy!
“Impeachment is off the table.”
She did almost as much long term damage to the US as Chimpy McBush’s reign with that single act.