The President is holding a press conference, his first opportunity to take questions since the election. I’ll follow along here. You can watch it live.
…Obama says our top priority has to be jobs and growth. First I’ve heard of it!
…The idea that balanced deficit reduction has anything to do with job creation is just such up-is-downism that I can hardly comment on it.
…Starts with opening remarks by banging on taxes. Notes correctly that extending tax cuts on the first $250,000 of income means that every American – including the wealthy – gets a tax cut.
…Obama here is basically trying to separate the tax issue from the rest of the fiscal slope issues.
…Obama references a letter from Tom Friedman’s ubiquitous desiring-for-bipartisan-compromise cab driver.
…And the first question is about who David Petraeus has an affair with. America!
…Obama doing a ton of buck-passing on Petraeus and the FBI.
…Jessica Yellen: “Why should anyone believe you about the Bush tax cuts, you caved before, why won’t you cave again?” Obama says that the economy was in a different place two years ago and can handle the expiration now… Obama says that Bush tax cuts had to be extended because he needed to get payroll tax cut and UI extension. Those are expiring too now!
…Obama says half of the fiscal cliff can be remedied by just extending the tax cuts on the first $250,000 of income. Then we can take a “serious look” at tax and entitlement reform.
…Obama basically parrots the “do the math” line that tax rates have to go up, and that you can’t make up the difference just by cutting deductions.
…Obama saying he wants a “big deal,” but he’s continually separating the tax rate issue from the rest of it.
…Obama says he wants an immigration reform bill proposed “very soon” after inauguration, very similar to the 2009 draft proposal from Schumer and Graham.
…The “first priority” was growth and jobs, and of course not one successive question or discussion has had anything to do with growth and jobs, with the possible exception of immigration reform, depending on how it’s structured.
…Chuck Todd, crackerjack interviewer, asks the same two questions everyone else asks.
…Dynamic scoring is a ridiculous fantasy, so good on Obama for calling it out.
…sorry, I missed a bunch of this. Back up on a climate change question. And Obama actually describes the state of climate science with the correct degree of urgency. “I am a firm believer that climate change is real, that it is impacted by carbon emissions, and that we have an obligation to do something about it.” But as for solution, he’s talking about fuel economy and clean energy, which I’m sure he knows are not enough. In fact, he says “we haven’t done as much as we need to.”




26 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
I can’t stand his smarmy middle-school teacher rhetoric (Hope I didn’t insult any middle-school teachers). It is just sickening.
Thanks DD for watching so I don’t have to. If he’s using a story by little tommy f. then we’re doomed. Then again were doomed any way with 0 in charge.
Gotta talk down to us “little people and DFH’s”
True but it’s rich people who direct what O can and can’t do.
“Mr. President why should the American people not expect you to cave on the Bush tax cuts like you did before?”
POTUS: “That was then…”
feh.
Very stunning moment, for me. What do we call a “half cliff,” something like a “hillock?”
There is no fucking emergency.
His favorite Chicago reporter just asked if there’s any scenario where we do go off the cliff?
preznit says, we can all imagine going over the cliff if, despite the dangers we can’t even agree to give middle class taxpayers a tax cut, they’re all gonna have a big tax hike. It is not necessary. Step number one that we can take in the next couple weeks … give the middle class the certainty that their taxes will not go up. Then he does mention entitlements as something to deal with in the post-tax-deal negotiations.
… It’s not calculus, it is arithmetic [to deal with the spending side].
Nobody seems to want to say it but the word that comes to mind is snotty. I call him Windy City.
Tough choices? Sounds like the Grand Betrayal to me.
Well, that’s who the people want and they want more of the same. I really can’t fault him anymore. The fault lies with his voters.
The only thing “dire” here is that none of our Senators or Representatives or “our” President for that matter want a call from Dimon or any other MOTU complaining about their return on investment (campaign contributions etc.).
Who yelled out that last question, which Obama called ‘a great question?’ But would not answer it because precedent. Bad journalist!
Was Jessica Yellin’ :)
Let’s not forget we face the fiscal cliff as a result of obama’s deficit commision formed via executive order.
Cause a vote for Jill Stein would have gotten us where?
Please sign my petition at whitehouse.gov. It says not to cut Social Security and Medicare. The URL is. http://wh.gov/XIIu
If Jill won, we would not be doing same failed things obama is continuing. Again, it’s einstein definition of insanity at work here. We can only speculate on what would have happened with Jill. We already know what we’ll get with obomber and at this point we can’t blame him.
Everyone who voted for Stein gets cuts in the soup line. And their conscience is clear next time (oops it already happened) a drone missile kills innocent people.
did romney win :)
Yes Rmoney won but now it is their money. :)
Romney didn’t win. We still have to stand for the 99%. I hope you sign the petition.
I get a 404 PAGE NOT FOUND…
“I am a firm believer that climate change is real, that it is impacted by carbon emissions, and that we have an obligation to do something about it.”
I agree, and I can say that as well.
Obama, on the other hand can do something about it. But he could before, and presided over increased drilling, increased fracking, and increase coal mining.’
It’s fast approaching the point of no return on this .
And Yeah, he’s a stuffed shirt.
Well, it certainly wouldn’t have hurt, and at least Romney wouldn’t be charging out of the gate, trying to slash Social Security first thing. And if he did, no one would have supported him. No, this is the worst possible scenario: an unaccountable president, supported by liberals, doing the bidding of his corporate masters for the next four years.
Heaven help us.
It amazes me that people continue to posit a connection between Obama’s words and his deeds.
Told the Democrats in Congress that the left has somewhere to go. Maybe they would have listened. We’ll never know.
Talk is cheap. As they say in Missouri: “Show me”.