I don’t know why I felt so insulted by Ben Bernanke’s housing speech yesterday, but it really stuck with me. Probably because he managed to give an entire speech on housing – one that at points implicitly blamed homeowners for their predicaments – without mentioning the word “fraud.” Or saying “I’m sorry.”
It was very much a forward-looking rather than backward-looking speech. But he describes the foreclosure crisis as the prime contributor to the Great Recession without bothering to mention that his agency had oversight responsibility over the mortgage market throughout the inflation of the housing bubble. The Greenspan Fed rejected consumer protection or regulation of any kind as a matter of ideology. And Bernanke wasn’t about to let that fact be known to the Operation HOPE audience. In fact, his message was that originators aren’t writing ENOUGH loans at this point:
Although the decline in the number of willing and qualified potential homebuyers explains some of the contraction in mortgage lending of the past few years, I believe that tight credit nevertheless remains an important factor as well. The Federal Reserve’s Senior Loan Officer Opinion Survey on Bank Lending Practices indicates that lenders began tightening mortgage credit standards in 2007 and have not significantly eased standards since. Terms and standards have tightened most for borrowers with lower credit scores and with less money available for a down payment. For example, in April nearly 60 percent of lenders reported that they would be much less likely, relative to 2006, to originate a conforming home-purchase mortgage to a borrower with a 10 percent down payment and a credit score of 620–a traditional marker for those with weaker credit histories. As a result, the share of home-purchase borrowers with credit scores below 620 has fallen from about 17 percent of borrowers at the end of 2006 to about 5 percent more recently. Lenders also appear to have pulled back on offering these borrowers loans insured by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA).
So Bernanke here is scolding mortgage brokers for employing tight credit standards. He even cites the lack of use of FHA loans. This came on the same day that an audit showed the FHA hitting $16.3 billion in losses, which will lead to the agency seeking taxpayer funds for the first time in history. And Bernanke’s complaint is that lenders won’t write ENOUGH FHA loans!
Bernanke actually blamed onerous regulations for the tightening of credit, including putback risk from the GSEs if the loan went sour. Apparently it’s inappropriate for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to check to see if the loans they buy were originated properly. And I love this sentence:
Certainly, some tightening of credit standards was an appropriate response to the lax lending conditions that prevailed in the years leading up to the peak in house prices.
And who created those lax conditions? It wouldn’t be the Federal Reserve, now would it? Maybe the people who missed a $8 trillion housing bubble should shut their mouths about the relative tightness of lending standards. Actually, you’d think they’d recognize that themselves. I don’t think there’s anyone in the country less credible on this topic than a Federal Reserve Board member from 2002-2006.
I really don’t need to go any further on this speech, it’s the same propaganda that we’ve commonly heard – embracing the foreclosure fraud settlement (the one where banks are paying for much of their penalty with other people’s money), the virtue of selling off foreclosed properties to institutional investors, etc. Really him going on about credit standards was all I needed to hear.




19 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Somebody has to explain to me or to Mr. Bernanke why we have a housing shortage so severe that it is necessary to pump up the industry to keep people from living in tents. I understand that in places where there has been a lot of immigration, the market might be tight (where are they?) and that the Jersey Shore and Staten Island need some help, but where else? I don’t see how a shortage of McMansions is a crying national disgrace that takes precedence over everything else.
Bernanke used to be an economist. But he forgot the first lecture.
Get with the program, David.
Per NPR, the only Village-acceptable phrase for `fraud’ is `sloppy paperwork‘.
DD–That was me, yelling at the radio. “Bernanke!!!??? Chastising banks for sitting on the trillions of dollars HE enthusiastically shoveled their way ‘to foam the runway’???!!!! Why not have actually attached some conditions to those trillions of OURS, ya douchebag thief-helper?
Oh. Right. The system works fine. For them. Why change? A little PR window-dressing, some faux finger-wagging, and poof! It’s all good.
That Legacy(TM) is getting a right good buffing, you betcha!
Really with you on this one, DD. One exception to your indictment of the Fed board of that era would be Ned Gramlich who was valiantly spitting into the wind at the time. Worth a mention because one of their own was sounding the alarm and they still did nothing.
Hey, isn’t this just an Alan Greenspan pander? Does anyone else remember Alan abruptly reversing course after Bush’s election and declaring the economy fine and private debt not a problem? Alan had been making noises about “irrational exuberance” and “taking away the punchbowl” before the election, but Bush’s evident desire to keep the party rolling and Alan’s desire to remain Fed chair met and shook hands.
Yes, it’s important we lend more to average Americans (through their banks, of course), so they can achieve The American Dream of House Ownership, which is very, very important for the simple reason that they’re Americans not idiots like the Koreans and Chinese who prefer savings over debt and find living accommodations accordingly.
Book Salon up with Greg Basta’s Trouble Is The Banks: Letters To Wall Street hosted by Sarah Jaffe
o.k. … where did my comment of 1 minute go ??
Thank you David .not only for your great reporting ,but equally important ,contextualizing it with a very enlightened perspective .Unfortunately some of the comments reflect bewilderment because systemic conformity has drained any and all aptitude for critical thinking ,i.e. ,abstract reason .They can’t entertain that the dual mandate is a fiction behind which the Fed serves its member shareholders by enforcing its only mandate ,enrichment of the international banking cartel .
A minimal understanding of capital flow,would aver the money-center monopoly is not selling credit for expanding industry , or ,any long term investments at the retail level.Without impeccable credit or collateral,wholesale lenders would be fools not to arbitrage free money into short term gains via the systemic incentivism designed by the Fed for retaining low rates .Why would banking oligarchs not short interest rates with tens of trillions and invest in a future they have the power to create ? More to the point ,this is the future that they have demanded the Fed also creates until 2015 , as the rigging continues .
Well BB may not be much of a Fed chair but he sure is good at making a thoughtful, serious face.
MOVIE – THE WALL STREET CONSPIRACY. I know the title sounds a bit alarmist and conspiratorial. But go to the website and watch the trailer. Judge for yourself. And then you can watch the movie online. And then you can order copies of the DVD. . . . and then, tell others. A movement for this needs to be organized. Short Sales of stock, naked short sales of stock, selling stocks and bonds that don’t exist. And nothing is being done. Nothing. The SEC, treasury, FBI, Senate Banking Commitee, all are looking the other way. And it is still going on. Have you or someone you know lost money in a pension fund? Private or Public? Your 401k disappeared? Watch this and tell others.
When you owe money on a mortgage, you are not a homeowner. Maybe a “home-ower”?
Greenspan understand that mortgage credit expansion via mortgage backed securities, invented by the GSE’s, was a key to keeping total systematic credit expanding even as the banks in the early 90′s were constrained in their lending by their weak position.
Whew,that’s a mouthful. It is important to try to understand this so read it a few times over.
First it must be understood that credit expansion, or contraction, in total, determines economic growth or contraction. Second it must be understood that for whatever reason, starting in the 80′s the dollar amount of new credit needed to produce one dollar of growth started to diverge from what had occurred during the previous 100 years. For 100 years about $1.60 of credit produced $1 in growth. By the mid 90s it became $3 dollars of credit to produce $1 in growth. Greenspan understood that new sources of systematic credit growth outside of traditional banking was necessary and so all manner of Asset Backed Securities were encouraged and first among them were Mortgage Backed Securities.
In his odd and probably ignorant way Bernanke is hoping that mortgage credit can again expand like in the bubble era. He knows but doesn’t mention that the banks do not take any of the risk of mortgages now. The GSE’s are buying up virtually every new mortgage in America. The housing market is thus totally socialized. Ben is reminding the banks that they don’t have to have tight standards, I guess, since they are not taking the risk. US taxpayers are. Already they are fated to paying at least $500 billion in former GSE losses (to GSE MBS purchasers).
It’s hard to say if Ben is a fool or a prisoner of the system or maybe even a scoundrel. No matter. The near one trillion per year mortgage credit expansion during the late bubble will never rise again.
Links? T/U. Found a trailer, not the movie.
rapier ,Ben works for the bankers ,i.e.,shareholders ,so he has a fiducial obligation to serve them.not us .It isn’t personal .The entire sector is socialized via moral hazard ,and the system must continue libor rigging via swaps and primary dealers to prevent the bond market from collapsing .At this point in time, we can’t take the fraud out of the system without destroying it .
Just as the Republicans still own the Democrats, the banksters still own the Fed and the Treasury and the Attorney General for that matter.
Maybe Chuck Schumer or Dick Durbin could introduce a “Looser Lending Standards” bill that would guarantee banks a high interest rate with their loans backed by our taxpayers so we can bail them out again, with no strings attached, when it all comes tumbling down.
Like waving a magic wand, it seems the housing market appears to be getting better — but only in cities where the banksters and wealthy foreign investors are gobbling up prime properties as a hedge against the coming bubble burst and collapse. And rental homes are being bought by the same crowd so they can bundle the mortgages and re-sell the bundles — just as they did leading up to the crash — to funnel into their worldwide ponzi scheme and line their own pockets. Ayn Rand would approve.
I doubt that many low or middle income folks are buying homes now — which is what these positive monthly housing reports would suggest. The prices are still too high — propped up by the banksters — and have yet to come close to their natural rock bottom prices that could make housing affordable again. Plus, there are still way too many foreclosures and good people being thrown out of their homes.
I haven’t found the answer yet. But telling folks that it’s their fault, and let’s just look forward sounds an awful lot like Barry O and Rahmbo’s spiel to progressives not that long ago.
This is all perfectly understandable. The entire system is careening towards apocalyptic disaster. It’s why Bernanke instituted QE Infinity in September. The Powers that Be in the Shadow Banking system are deleveraging their fake assets now before the imminent collapse to come, forcing Bernanke to continue to push more new money into the system to keep the entire financial system from collapsing right now. But once the market participants realize that QE Infinity has crossed from diminishing returns to negative returns, the markets will collapse just like 2008 only much larger. However, those same Powers that Be will have the money to buy everyone else’s hard assets for pennies on the dollar. Why do you think all these people are heading for the exits? People like Geithner and Hillary. Do you think they want to be around once this apocalypse hits? Why do you think Obama signed the NDAA? Look at the links below, some of which are from 2 years ago and tell me if it isn’t eerily familiar? Especially that Oliver Wyman analysis. Good analysis in the links, but you’ll have to deal with their constant (and purposeful in my opinion) conflation of Keynesianism with Monetarism and Cronyism.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2012-09-23/fed-has-another-39-trillion-qe-go-least
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/chris-martenson-are-we-heading-another-2008
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/bagus-bernanke-rebuttal-redux
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/guest-post-federal-reserves-cargo-cult-magic-housing-will-lift-economy-again
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2012-11-02/reform-collapse-dysfunctional-status-quo
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2012-11-09/are-markets-and-macro-repeating-2008
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/chris-martenson-we-are-about-have-another-2008-style-crisis
http://www.oliverwyman.com/media/OW_EN_FS_Publ_2011_State_of_Financial_Services_2011_US_Web.pdf
MBA reported that more than 15% of FHA loans were delinquent in the 3rd quarter (and every quarter before that)
hi smcclurk ,don’t forgot the main feature of asset looting ,austerity ,which is the linchpin of all LBO takeovers and the key primer for that $2trillion on the sidelines to be employed by monopoly predators to seize all hard assets and privatize positional assets for pennies on the dollar .Thats a fact ,since we know giveaway prices require we be desperate and impoverished .My belief, however ,is that this fact will be in concert with a global collapse from which all sovereignties will be subsumed by a centralized banking apparatus ,likely the IMF ,from which sdr liquidity is printed to replace our worthless fiat money .Obviously it is impossible to repay the debt unless it were monetized via hyper-inflation .
I think most FDl have come to grips that governments now make policy to impoverish us ,because they don’t distinguish between goals of monopoly as opposed to entrepreneurial expansion ,i.e. ,business as opposed to production .