
Police arrest striking Walmart workers in Paramount, CA
Walmart workers staged their historic strike on Black Friday. Management tried to downplay it, and given how massive Walmart is, the relative strength of the strike was small in real terms compared to the company’s 1.4 million workers. But it would be silly to just leave it at that without the context of the company witnessing no labor strikes in its 50-year history. The strikes were an expression of human dignity from a segment of their labor force that feels discriminated, retaliated, unappreciated and downtrodden. Josh Eidelson has the definitive minute-by-minute report from Friday.
Now I can sit here and respond to Peter Suderman’s 17-twitter salute in defense of Walmart, a familiar mix about the benefits of low prices, the nature of retail and frankly a tautology about how docking Walmart executives pay wouldn’t allow a large raise for all 1.4 million workers, something entirely defined by their size and not the penury of their executives. But I think sharing my Walmart Black Friday experience may shed a little light on the issue, an unexamined corner that Suderman leaves dark.
It actually started out at a bust. I found my Corporate Action Network widget and located a store in Northeast Philadelphia, near where I spent Thanksgiving, that had a protest Friday morning. We couldn’t get there until a little later than the scheduled time, and as we pulled up, all we saw was a police barricade in front of the store, empty, which looked suspiciously like a free speech zone. Turns out it was designed for early shoppers so they wouldn’t run each other over with their carts and cause a stampede. Crowd control was on the minds of this store’s management, not protest.
Out of the corner of my eye, I saw two people holding fliers. Maybe they were with the protest, leafleting outside the store about the high cost of low prices and the wage and hour grievances of Walmart workers. But no. When we approached one, an African-American woman, she knew nothing of the protest. The fliers advertised some other store event.
We struck up a conversation with the woman. “We’re here for the Black Friday protests,” we said.
“Why are you protesting?”
“Walmart workers are walking out of their jobs in a bunch of locations because of low pay, low hours, intimidation and retaliation for speaking out.”
And here was the crucial moment. The woman had no idea that Walmart workers were low-paid. “This store makes beaucoup bucks,” she said. “I figured the workers did well because there are always lots of people in the store.”
Before, say, 1979, she would have been largely correct in her assumption, at least on this point: worker productivity and wages rose at generally the same rate. It would not have been outlandish to assume that employees at a concern that succeeded would have shared in that reward. But this is no longer how the world works. That relationship between productivity and wages has been severed. This is true well on down the supply chain, where some of the worst abuses take place, all at the behest of Walmart, whose size effectively disrupts market economics by setting the prices they’re willing to pay, leaving little for the workers who supply them. (The threat of international labor strife from these suppliers may be even more disruptive for the country. More on this from Bmaz.)
In other words, the Walmart strikes must be seen not as just a strike against one retail employer but a larger expression of dissent against how American capitalism has progressed, with rampant inequality and profits extracted out of productivity and sent to the top. And there’s no real understanding of the mechanics of how this happened, no consciousness that a busy store doesn’t necessarily mean a happy workforce. The strike signaled a cry from the bottom, the same dynamic that animated Occupy Wall Street and its offshoots. It says that the current order is not sufficient to broad segments of society. Maybe not broad enough yet to have an impact, but it’s early.
One last thing about our new friend. She said, after we explained the way in which workers don’t share in the success of the company, and how hours get cut to ensure that the company doesn’t get on the hook for employee health care, and all the rest, after this she said, “I feel weak right now. I feel like I don’t want to shop in this store.”
You could boil down the entire purpose of the strike to that.
Photo by DB’s travels under Creative Commons license




12 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Peter Suderman is full of… something. Walmart could pay itrs employees better and cover benefits at a much higher rate. Witness Costco and Jim Sinegal. One of his primary talking points in that twitter stream is how wonderful it is that Walmart keeps its food prices low so low income people can afford it, but they pay their people so poorly that the employees need food stamps to be able to shop there!
Tried to leave this as a link, but it won’t seem to work.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/17/business/yourmoney/17costco.html?_r=3&pagewanted=all&
Thank you for the link. I used to shop at Price Club in the 1980′s in Mesa,
Az. Not every company is like Walmart.(Thank God.)
What the low price people tend to forget is the fact that lower wages mean that people can buy LESS.
One of the things that led this country was the fact that high wages allowed people to buy things such as cars, refrigerators, air conditioners, etc.
If everyone in the country was working at WalMart, the auto industry would disappear.
It would be interesting if we could have a conversation between Sam Walton and Henry Ford. Henry was a hard-ass too but not like Sam, or at least, his offspring.
I haven’t stepped foot in Walmart since the 80′s when I went in to a store to investigate a sale. What a come-on! I didn’t buy anything and never have come back.
The other side of the food question is what kind of food? If Walmart insisted on at least labeling GM foods let alone offering alternatives, what kind of difference would that make! Monsanto and the Walton’s would have a nice talk also!
Big profits. No risk, so the managers insist are the demands of “investors”. That has to be the place that changes need to be made and for starters, investors need to understand that they are investing into a much bigger system than the bottom line of a corp.
The Midas touch is just around the corner, methinks.
I don’t have a link, but I heard a report on NPR on “Black Friday” which I *believe* indicated that if the top brass & the Walton sibs took some really marginally smaller amount of “income,” it would enable them to pay their employees a reasonably significant increase in salary. Given how low Walmart employees are paid, it’s believable.
That’s what is such a crime: that the top 1% is so blatantly living off the sweat of close-to-slave labor, and yet too many citizens still seem to view this as their “due” because the 1%, as we know, “works so hard.” Guess the Walmart wage-slaves are just your typical lazy moochers.
I think that there was reasonable turn-out for the stikes, but most of the media of course ignored it.
Over one-hundred demonstrators turned out for our Walmart action in Dearborn, Michigan, just outside of Detroit. At least a dozen police cars, no arrests. The cops actually blocked the drive in front of the store, making in harder for shoppers to access the entrance and causing a tie up of shopper’s vehicular traffic. The best part was when an IWW Santa Claus entered the store, and a choir of Wobblies and reps from other trade unions “disguised” as shoppers sang christmas carols with lyrics changed to inform the crowd about Walmart’s greed.
Solidaridad y no pasaran!
The thing about defenses of WalMart by commentators like this Peter Suderman is that they think they can make pronouncements about executive pay and worker pay based on a company’s earnings and revenues. Each WalMart store, however, starts out and is determined as a real estate development proposition financed by stocks and bonds and related financial instruments. The “profits” of these concerns are often taken out at the front end based upon projected revenues not out of actual earnings. Earnings are depressed to pay off the stock and bond holders and other other upstream rentiers thereby starving the workers and also allowing the “employer” company to plead poverty when workers become restive about their low pay.
“Oh, the wages inside are frightful,
The timekeepers are so spiteful,
I’ve lotsa shopping to go,
But to Wally’s I will not go.
No no no no no no no!”
Luvin’ it. Thanks for your report.
As a response to the invasion of our community by Walmart we started a ballot initiative. The Eureka Fair wage act that will make them pay $12 an hour minimum wage. You can find the text of the proposed law here. We have over 1000 signatures in our city, bring the idea to your town.
http://eurekafairwageact.wordpress.com/
As a worker at walmart it is very true that must workers do have to have food stamps to make ends met.And I think like everyone else if you pay more you get more from the workers, in return they would shop spent more at the store.