The White House, in announcing the departure of Mary Schapiro as Chairwoman of the SEC, also took the unusual step of “designating” her replacement – a way to fill the vacancy at the top of the commission without confirmation in the Senate. Elisse Walter, a current commissioner, will replace Schapiro. Here’s the announcement:
President Obama said, “I want to express my deep gratitude to Mary Schapiro for her steadfast leadership at the Securities and Exchange Commission. When Mary agreed to serve nearly four years ago, she was fully aware of the difficulties facing the SEC and our economy as a whole. But she accepted the challenge, and today, the SEC is stronger and our financial system is safer and better able to serve the American people – thanks in large part to Mary’s hard work.
“I am also pleased to designate Elisse Walter as SEC Chairman after Mary’s departure. I’m confident that Elisse’s years of experience will serve her well in her new position, and I’m grateful she has agreed to help lead the agency.”
“Designate” is a new word in this context. Usually, you nominate someone to fill a vacancy of this type, subject to advise and consent by the Senate. But here, the White House basically elevated Walter to the Chair position, not as an acting chair but as the actual chair. This leaves a vacancy on the five-member commission, which could lead to immediate problems. But it’s much easier to get a commissioner confirmed than the Chair.
In addition, Walter’s own term ends at the end of 2013, so this becomes a short-term assignment. Walter could get re-nominated at that time, but that would require confirmation.
Walter is a career regulator who returned to the SEC in 2008 – appointed as a Democratic commissioner by George W. Bush – after a stint at the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). She’s been generally in line with Schapiro in her votes as an SEC commissioner. Schapiro’s husband, Ronald Stern, is a Vice President and Senior Competition Counsel with General Electric, a major financial entity through its subsidiary GE Capital.
So what this looks like to me is a politically expedient way to keep someone in the Chair position without having to go through Congress. The White House could decide to keep Walter in that spot, or nominate a replacement. But Walter retains the full regulatory authority of the office in the meantime. This is how we operate in Washington in an era of a broken Senate, where normal Presidential appointments cannot get through obstruction. So the executive branch uses questionable moves to short-circuit legislative authority, aggrandize Presidential power, as a counterpoint. This is why the most important vote of the next couple years comes in January, when the Senate decides whether or not to really change their own rules and make it a majoritarian institution, or whether it goes for a cosmetic change.
I don’t see just end-running the Senate and keeping things pat as tenable, however. You’ll have a situation with an equal number of Democrats and Republicans on the commission, a recipe for gridlock. This could be the very GOAL of those who don’t want any aggressiveness out of the SEC, but it’s not really tenable to keep the main securities regulator as a non-functioning body. So the White House will have to either nominate another commissioner, or another chair.
They should be pushed to nominate another chair, someone with the proper background and prosecutorial mien to turn the SEC into an actual enforcer again. CREDO has a petition seeking such a resolution, with a legitimate regulator in the position like a Sheila Bair or a Neil Barofsky. It’s a long shot, maybe an impossible shot, but it at least SHOULD BE the next step.




14 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
I don’t see just end-running the Senate and keeping things pat as tenable, however. You’ll have a situation with an equal number of Democrats and Republicans on the commission, a recipe for gridlock.
Why not? It’s obvious that the Democrats that matter in D.C. don’t want the SEC to operate properly.
“This could be the very GOAL of those who don’t want any aggressiveness out of the SEC …”
Why yes, “pragmatically” and “practically”, it “could” be.
” … aggrandize Presidential power …”
Perish the thought, DDay, add it to the “kill list” … the VERY idea, indeed.
I’m going to second Phil’s perspective, “… the Democrats … don’t want the SEC to operate properly.”
DW
“[I]t’s not really tenable to keep the main securities regulator as a non-functioning body.”
Since when has the SEC been a functioning body? Given that its charter is to protect investors, it hasn’t performed that function in decades.
Walter came over from FINRA, an organization known for picking on the little guy and letting the organization run wild. She’s a perfect pick for the SEC Chair.
Wait: You’re suggesting that an actual “legitimate regulator” occupy the top position at a regulatory agency? Wouldn’t that make way too much sense?
Yeah, that’s just what we need. (By the by, great piece yesterday, Masaccio.)
Total agreement!
“CREDO has a petition seeking such a resolution, with a legitimate regulator in the position like a Sheila Bair or a Neil Barofsky. It’s a long shot, maybe an impossible shot, but it at least SHOULD BE the next step.”
It is ‘impossible shot’, a never considered shot.
It is one of the many reasons I knew I couldn’t for POTUS twice.
Considering the stagnant pool the ‘designate’ rose to the top from, and a bush appointee, I have NO hope anything of regulatory, or legal consequence to occur in the next four years.
Let’s just point out that both Bair and Barofsky were also Bush appointees. It’s not about who hired you but what you did. Lots of reasons to be concerned about the Walter designation, I don’t think Bush is one of them.
Same Shit – Different Day. Government and industry incest.
touche’.
If there is an “empty chair” now at the SEC, doesn’t that take away any advantage the Democrats might have on the formerly 5-person commission (and I realize that a Democrat on an SEC panel ain’t worth $#!+, but just curious). It seems like a deadlocked 2-2 commission would leave the rules unchanged, right?
Obama knows that he’s going to have a bunch of highlevel appointments that need Senate confirmation, and this choice reflects a desire to (a) avoid a fight here, so as to be able to fight elsewhere, and (b) signal the Wall Street folks who opposed him during the campaign that they have little to fear from him in terms of cracking down via regulations and oversight.
A charitable explanation would be that Obama wants to minimize their opposition to a coming push to raise taxes for the wealthy and do away with such loopholes as “carried interest” deductions. A more cynical explanation is that Obama is simply doing exactly what he wants to do in terms of policy, which is to calm the waters with the MOTUs (and nevermind the whole accountability thing). I lean more toward the latter (see the absence of Dawn Johnsen, Neil Barofsky, Elizabeth Warren, and Sheila Bair; see also the presence of Tim Geithner and Eric Holder).
When given an opportunity to appoint someone serious about oversight, time and time again Obama has ducked and gone with a “safe” choice of someone willing to more or less keep the status quo going. In that regard, Ms. Walter is exactly the kind of appointment Obama’s past record would have predicted.
And that’s not good news for anyone who is serious about oversight and accountability. Masaccio’s observation @4 is absolutely spot on. FINRA is not a governmental oversight organization; it is the self-regulation program of the financial services industry.
If that makes you think of the fox guarding the hen house, it’s only because all too often, the analogy fits.
Considering that the SEC was not able to prosecute the Wall Street banksters that took down our economy and stole our wealth, and oversaw the largest loss of home values in history, I would say they are a failure.
We need someone strong and fierce, that can fight with the titans of Wall Street and win. These appointments are weak. What is Obama thinking?
We are still waiting for justice!