Democrats want President Obama’s campaign to release the vast, rich amount of data they gained throughout 2012 for use by statewide and local campaigns. I don’t think they should hold their breath.
From the candidates running in 2014 to the state Democratic parties to progressive advocacy groups, there is an intense behind-the-scenes lobbying campaign afoot to pry from Obamaland its groundbreaking voter database. The data is rich with intricate layers of information about individuals’ voting habits, television viewing tastes, propensity to volunteer, car registration, passions, email address, cellphone numbers, and social media contacts. The historical trove enabled Obama to connect with voters on a highly personal level and get them not only to vote but to actively persuade their neighbors to do the same.
Now that Obama has been reelected, other Democrats are falling over themselves to get their hands on these sophisticated indicators for their own campaigns.
Several top Obama campaign officials, who asked not to be quoted by name, said that no decisions have been made about the data, including where to house it and how to use it to benefit the party.
Those decisions likely won’t be made until closer to the president’s inauguration next month. Among the prime options being discussed by president’s political hands: setting up an independent, not-for-profit entity, run by Obama aides, to manage and keep the electronic files updated so the contacts could be used to further the president’s agenda. Handing over the names to campaigns is not high on the list right now.
Congressional campaigns didn’t get the Obama database in 2008 either, as the 2010 elections made painfully clear. Maybe there was some rationale there, to not dilute the value by handing it over. But the President won’t ever run for another election. And they didn’t exactly utilize the 2008 database to much of a positive effect in governing in the first term. That just sounds like an excuse to guard the data.
The campaign plans to create a “best practices” document that I guess would set guidelines for how to manage campaigns. But that’s a poor substitute for the physical data, which would give candidates a powerful leg up in the midterms.
Obamaland justifies this by saying that the data gained comes from some special attachment to the President, and maybe at a partial level, that’s true. But it speaks more to the demolition of Democratic infrastructure in favor of Obama’s internal networks. The President learned that, when you defund and de-emphasize the progressive infrastructure, suddenly there’s nothing in place to help with a legislative push. So campaign operatives who worked single-mindedly for the benefit of one person’s political future will then turn right around and wade into the governing arena?
MoveOn has downshifted into a glorified petition delivery service. I don’t see anyone rising up to offer an independent, ideological voice as a replacement. As long as the data remains locked up, and the funding channeled to one central source, progressives will have a hard time.
Image by curious yellow under Creative Commons license.





15 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
MoveOn’s loss is PCCC’s gain.
I agree with Obama keeping his data to himself. People didn’t sign up thinking they were giving their info to corporate Dems.
Obama’s response to not supporting down ticket races show, once again, how self serving and to me, how he only supports his national, big dollar donors, not the Democratic Party nor the citizenry.
Isn’t a datasbase that can elect a black president…worth a few bucks…to someone?
Smart move by Obama. Gives him control of the D’s from beyond the Presidential Term limits.
This act of selfishness could come back to bite Obama in the ass two years from now. History tells us that the party in the White House does poorly in the 6th year of a presidency, and that will be especially true in 2014 if downticket Democrats are starved for cash.
Prediction: If 2014 is a wave election for the Republicans, a resolution of impeachment will be brought to the House floor, even if on the flimsiest of pretexts.
MoveOn has downshifted into a glorified petition delivery service. I don’t see anyone rising up to offer an independent, ideological voice as a replacement. As long as the data remains locked up, and the funding channeled to one central source, progressives will have a hard time.
Somehow, I don’t think O’s database is the central imediment to Progressives having a voice in the Democratic Party. Or did I miss someting?
MoveOn.org has become a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Democratic Party. As an independent progressive organization, it has the same credibility as Daily Kos–absolute zero.
Sure, Barack Obama won’t run for anything again.
But — I got one word for you: Michelle.
O will give up his database immediately after Amy Goodman reveals who her donors are to her $6.5 million annual budget. (hint: never)
Hey there, eCAHN!!!!! how ya doin’?
.’..the demolition of Democratic infrastructure in favor of Obama’s internal networks.’
Not shocking:
Obama moves DNC operations to Chicago -politico
June 12, 2008
…the power will clearly be shifting to a centralized Chicago hub.
The DNC’s key role in coordinating political operations with state parties is expected to largely be taken over and overseen by Obama’s senior staff in Chicago, state party officials said.
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0608/Obama_moves_DNC_operations_to_Chicago.html
Dems’ coordinated campaign largely disbanded, replaced by Obama staff | Iowa Independent
July 3, 2008
By mid-June the Obama campaign had deployed its own staff to Iowa to lead its general election campaign here, a move that is typical for a presidential nominee. But Obama’s campaign began to assign organizers to parts of the state where the coordinated campaign already had a presence, and insiders began to wonder why. In the past week and a half, the answer to that question has been slowly revealed.
Obama’s campaign demanded that its own staff replace existing staff in places where there was overlap and cast aside several opportunities to cooperate with down-ticket candidates between now and November, another source familiar with the negotiations said. Essentially, the state coordinated campaign was disbanded and replaced by the Obama campaign organization.
http://iowaindependent.com/2553/exclusive-dems-coordinated-campaign-largely-disbanded-replaced-by-obama-staff
What, ‘It’s all about me’ Obama is unenthusiastic about helping others??!! And people get on Jill Stein’s case about party building.
That said, the data that Obamaland holds (tv viewing habits, etc.) does seem rather intrusive, but then again, who provides that information to a political campaign?
Quite true about Move-on. I guess I failed to make my point. What I was trying to say was that there are numerous reasons that O and the Dems will not give progressives a seat at the table. O’s database does not seem to me to be a serious threat to progressives whether it is shared or not.
Apple, meet steel girder…
…let alone orange
This sounds like Clinton (Bill) to me. More concerned about his own political future and clout than advocating the nominal ascent of his party.
With both Obama and Clinton, I have feared that they actually *wanted* to share power with Repugs rather than with their fellow Dems, because some of those might introduce embrassingly progressive legislation which they had previously said they would support. With Repugs in charge, that “threat” is forever bansihed, plus they can grimace and say “they MADE me do it” when signing a bill favoring the Looting Class all the while inwardly smiling.
-stewartm